What Would U.S. mobilization look like?

Discussion in 'Warfare / Military' started by Dayton3, Oct 17, 2022.

  1. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,410
    Likes Received:
    6,722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Assume the U..S. decided it needed to get ready for a major war what would American mobilization look like? Assume that a draft is off the table of course but beyond that what would it look like for the U.S. to be mobilized? What reserve and guard units would be called up and in what order? How would they be equipped? Where would they be sent once called up?

    Just curious.
     
  2. Farnsworth

    Farnsworth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    469
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Both Democrats and Republicans agree now that the only reason for a military to exist in the U.S. is to kill uppity proles, so mobilization no longer requires a Navy or more than a few hundred thousand soldiers, mostly trannies and dykes.
     
  3. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,410
    Likes Received:
    6,722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Extremely stupid post. What makes you think either party views the proper use of the U.S. military is to kill our own citizens? Stupid beyond belief.
     
  4. Tucsonican

    Tucsonican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2015
    Messages:
    821
    Likes Received:
    847
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Any mobilization plan would be entirely dependent on the nature of the threat to be addressed. There isn't a "one size fits all" answer.
     
    Dayton3 likes this.
  5. Farnsworth

    Farnsworth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    469
    Trophy Points:
    83

    Actually that is exactly the GOP's belief, and President Hoover used them for exactly that, so did several previous Presidents, especially when big business found they could bribe Congress a lot cheaper than their traditional use of private armies to mow down uppity proles. Too bad you choose to ignore real history. George Washington was, first Jefferson came along and did the same, and so on right up to the present day.
     
    Last edited: Oct 18, 2022
  6. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,410
    Likes Received:
    6,722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You don't know I suppose that Herbert Hoover had little or nothing to do with the rousting of the so called "Bonus Army".
     
  7. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113

    No draft, no mobilization. Nobody trusts the government, the current Commander in Chief is a senile fool, the chairman of the joint chiefs is possibly a traitor who colludes with the Chinese, much of the top leadership are there because they are woke not because they are skilled in martial arts, congress is full of cheaters and spies.

    Why would people join a military run by those people?
     
    FatBack and James California like this.
  8. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,410
    Likes Received:
    6,722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Because war can make heroes even out of fools and simpletons. And even traitors.

    Besides which no one would have to "join" the military even in a nationwide mobilization.
    .
    They're already there. Reservists right now number in the hundreds of thousands
     
    Last edited: Oct 18, 2022
  9. Farnsworth

    Farnsworth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    469
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I suppose you don't know what you're talking about.
     
  10. Farnsworth

    Farnsworth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    469
    Trophy Points:
    83
    When Jay Gould said " I can hire half the working class to kill the other half", he was speaking from personal experience; the armed forces will do whatever they're told to do by those who sign their paychecks. The myth that they would never turn on the American public is a laughable myth that has been proven false over and over and over again.
     
    yangforward likes this.
  11. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    51,600
    Likes Received:
    22,912
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I think the answer is the recent history; the mobilization for 9/11, Afghanistan, and then Iraq. Of course I doubt we could field a military that size now. I imagine you would have to go to a draft.

    My reserve unit was called up after 9/11. First, it mobilized a certain segment of technical specialists, about a dozen, who went to a national level assignment. Then in November we were told that we we would be mobilized early December. At that point, the rest of the unit was mobilized...Stayed that way for 22 months.
     
  12. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,410
    Likes Received:
    6,722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    List at least eight times the American military has turned on the American public.
     
  13. James California

    James California Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    11,335
    Likes Received:
    11,470
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ~ Yes I remember in history class reading about our Presidents mentioning a American mobilization military of "mostly trannies and dykes " ... :aww:
     
    FatBack likes this.
  14. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ok, but that’s not what I stated and it has nothing to do with this op.
     
  15. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,551
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Pretty much like WWII.

    One of the biggest reasons that Congress and the President resist "declarations of war" is that it really does give a great deal of power to the government. Including allowing it to put in place things like rationing, mandating price and wage freezes, even to taking over large segments of the industry as needed to produce war materials.

    So to see what it would be like, look no farther than 1941.
     
  16. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,410
    Likes Received:
    6,722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You really think our mobilization plans are the same as EIGHTY ONE years ago!!!!???

    You know we even have planes without propellers now?
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2022
  17. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,551
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Then maybe you need to realize what you said.

    Our military mobilizes all the time. I think that you simply do not know what you are trying to ask for.

    All "mobilization" is is preparing the military to move where needed. War is not needed for that.
     
    Lil Mike likes this.
  18. James California

    James California Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    11,335
    Likes Received:
    11,470
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ~ Exactly correct. At present the USA is moving towards a WOKE military. The "mobilization" would likely be a mass exodus from the country ...
    ~ No it can't ... and never has. Forrest Gump does not count .

    Eighty-one years ago the USA could tell the difference between a male a and female.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2022
    FatBack likes this.
  19. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    52,944
    Likes Received:
    49,349
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I believe it's the army corps of engineers who are the ones responsible for constructing the dykes.

    Lol
     
    James California likes this.
  20. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,551
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Actually, here is the funniest thing. It did, and it does count. Because in many ways that really happened during Vietnam.

    Back in 1966, SecDef Robert McNamara and President Johnson came up with an idea as part of the "War on Poverty". That the military can give a lot of people important job training and skills, and a lot of the lowest income were not able to pass the entry requirements. Therefore, a lot of them were waived, allowing people who mentally were not normally qualified to enlist. It was officially called "Project 100,000", but was often called things like "McNamara's Folly", "MacNamara's Misfits", and in the Marines it was commonly known as "McNamara's Moron Corps". And before the program was cancelled, over 350,000 were accepted that normally would not have been able to join the military.

    And to give an idea how low, before the ASVAB they used the AFQT, for "Armed Forces Qualification Test". Scored from 1 to 99, the lowest combined score allowed was 31 for the Army (up to 36 for the Air Force). Project 100,000 lowered it down to 10 for all services.
     

Share This Page