That had nothing to do with the basic difference between definitive terms. And if you are incapable of realizing this, it makes no difference to me. We have 3 terms in regards to this issue, and there is a reason for 3 instead of 2. Each represents something different. Agnosticism is not atheism. Period. Agnosticism is not theism, period. And there is no existing logic that would negate this. If there is, I would love to see it. So would profs who teach logic and reason at the college level.