When I see a tattoo on a pretty girl...

That is not the point. Tattoos won't make you prettier and if anything, they'll even make you less pretty. If a woman with tattoos is hot, it is not the tattoo that makes her hot.

 

Look it up in the DSM. It's probably more than one mental disorder.

 

I was responding to the statement that hot women don't need tattoos because they don't need the attention. Firstly, if anyone needs... no demands attention, it's hot women. LOL!!! But I have seen tattoos on the hottest of hot.

 

Depends on the girl and the tattoo. Sometimes it's hot.

 

an ugly Christmas tree?

- - - Updated - - -

Exactly its the tattoo that makes her look less hot and more like a fat biker dude.

 

I love this one

 

I think the concept of there being "greater sins" applies here.

 

Yeah, where everyone wants to express their individuality by looking like everyone else

 

It is so strange.


A woman wouldn't think of wearing the same clothes or hair style for years. Women change and grow. In a way- tattoos change too They fade, smear, sag and become totally illegible, which is often an improvement of sorts.

On old funny car with lots of faded graphics is a valuable collector classic.
And old coca-cola sign with rust and maybe bullet holes is a valuable piece of collectable antique memorabilia.
But an old woman with tattoos.... not so much.

 

Someone who leaks a lot when they take a drink

 

Don't think I would consider the first two to be "attractive."

 

I don't mind them on men (as long as they aren't covered with them), but I don't really like them on women. I guess a tiny one would be okay, but most of the time they look kind of . . . trashy IMO. Not that the person who has them IS trashy, it's just the first impression I have of them, especially a woman who has them all over her. Sorry, no offense meant to any women who might have some!

 

A lot of women get what are called tramp stamps. The other tattoos are direction signs.

- - - Updated - - -

They are like a flashing red light. Back in the old days, those were on cat houses. Today the women are happy to have them.

While some may love tattoos, I am with ChrisL on this issue. No disrespect to the good folks that happen to like them.

 

Who wants this girl all covered in tattoos?

http://www.si.com/swim-daily/2016/12/27/emily-ratajkowski-nude-christmas-cards

 

not a fan, only acceptable if its minimal and covered by normal clothing.

However, if you are a stripper or a drunk college chick on tinder, i'm ok with it for that one night.

Not that we can't be friends or anything (several of my friends have tat's) but visible tattoo's mean one thing for sure, you won't be hired by me, the interview will last about 30 seconds after I see the tattoo.

The larger and more visible they are will very quickly decrease the chance that I will give you a ride, assist you on the roadside, or if you get to the super strange stage like some of the above, I won't even acknowledge you.

ps... the ear lobe stretching thing... that's even worse.

this image kind of sums it up for me...

 

That's always been my thinking -- I wouldn't want to wear the same pair of shoes for the rest of my life... so why the same body art? And many times it is BAD art. Women who tattoo their legs looks like they have varicose veins. Angelina Jolie's tattoos on her upper arm looks like a bar code. I know a guy who first ran out and got roses and thorns tattoos on his arm. Then styles changed and he went Celtic -- then Chinese for an update -- well he looked like the underside of a bridge. I know another guy who decided, while drunk, to have his wedding band tattooed on his finger. The jerk tattoo artist drew a ring with a big square stone. Perhaps he thought it looked kingly - but I thought it looked like a woman's cocktail ring. The sad thing is - it's forever. Can you imagine a sagging 80 year old woman with a tattoo of a fairy on her bottom?

 

I've seen too many (let's say) over-abundant female posteriors with low slung pants revealing a 'plumbers crack' with a 'tramp stamp.' I'm sure at one time it looked sexy but now......not so much.

 

I am glad the ladies spoke up on behalf of styles. Defenders of those Tattoos never mention the fact the wearer of the tattoo is disfigured, more than likely, for life. What they see as art is observed by most people who ask themselves, what the heck was that? A billboard on legs?

 

To what end? All I could hope to do is hurt her feelings or make her mad.

You have no idea! Yes, it is what I live for. If it wasn't for young hotties I wouldn't be here [I mean alive].

Most women really have no idea how powerful the sex drive is for some of us; nor the indescribable joy of beauty.

 

They say it's an expression of who they are,
well, we do know that it's a Ferrari underneath, skin deep are just superficial the same as looks.
What matters most is the roaring engine inside.

 

No such thing.

James 2:10 -- For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it.

A very interesting concept that many "Christians" would be well-advised to ponder.

- - - Updated - - -

Got a red convertible and a toupee to go with that mid-life crisis?

 

No, just lots of hot women. And this is nothing new. I've always been a sex fiend. Most real men are.

Others just roll around on the floor I guess. Are you having pain?

 

The first two were both probably a 6 out of ten before the ink made them a 4 and a -1 respectively. The last would be a 9+, but now falls to a 7.

 

This concept has of course been pondered. Here is quick discussion on the matter: http://biblehub.com/library/watson/the_ten_commandments/3_2_degrees_of_sin.htm

 

Second one has a lot more problems going on than just tattoos. I'm not even sure if that is a woman, TBH.