Where Is The “Climate Emergency”?

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Sunsettommy, Apr 26, 2021.

  1. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Watts Up With That?

    Where Is The “Climate Emergency”?
    13 hours ago

    Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

    EXCERPT:

    I listed some of the following in my previous post, and a commenter said they were important enough to deserve a post on their own … I agree.

    Despite my asking over and over in a host of forums, to date nobody has been able to tell me just what this supposed “CLIMATE EMERGENCY!!” actually is and where I might find evidence that it exists. Here are some facts for the folks that think that the climate is a real danger to humanity.

    Deaths from climate-related phenomena are at an all-time low. If you think deaths from climate-related catastrophes are an emergency, please point in the graph below to the start of the “emergency”.

    [​IMG]

    LOT MORE IN THE LINK HERE

    ========

    How much longer will warmist/alarmists continue to allow climate propagandists keep them dumb and ignorant?
     
    Jack Hays and dharbert like this.
  2. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    5,579
    Likes Received:
    2,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  3. dgrichards

    dgrichards Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2020
    Messages:
    1,172
    Likes Received:
    539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This is a link to a blogger whose main if not only purpose is to debunk anthropomorphic climate change. Not quite a reliable source for fact based science. I know this because I did not stop at the link, I went quite a bit farther. Sometimes the danger of relying on one unchecked,, un fact checked link leaves you open to unwisely relying on some ones deranged notion as defensible facts. Sorry you fell for this one.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2021
    gabmux likes this.
  4. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Thank you for not addressing an article you didn't read in detail, must be that common fear that warmist/alarmists duffer from.....

    If you think the article is bad, you are encouraged to go beyond your source fallacy bias and make a cogent argument.....

    No one is stopping you from doing it.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2021
    Jack Hays likes this.
  5. Moonglow

    Moonglow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    18,251
    Likes Received:
    6,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This period is known as "the calm before the storm".
     
    gabmux likes this.
  6. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    What storm is that?

    But then you will run to a far into the future model to tell you what to fear.

    That is sad.
     
    cabse5 likes this.
  7. Moonglow

    Moonglow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    18,251
    Likes Received:
    6,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The storm of climate change over the next one thousand years...
     
  8. Moonglow

    Moonglow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    18,251
    Likes Received:
    6,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The humans will poison the planet and kill off the animal kingdom long before the climate changes.
     
    Sunsettommy and gabmux like this.
  9. dgrichards

    dgrichards Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2020
    Messages:
    1,172
    Likes Received:
    539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What in the hell leads you to the conclusion that I did not read the article? I see that you offer no rebuttal. I've done my research, do yours!
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2021
  10. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    You show no evidence that you read it and offer no counterpoint to it either.

    I was the one who posted the article and agree with it, it is YOU who has the opportunity to make a rebuttal to the article, that is what I expect from YOU.

    The article remains unchallenged.
     
    Jack Hays likes this.
  11. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    So far you post ZERO evidence or reasoned arguments.

    Why can't YOU and dgrichards answer this simple question?

    Where Is The “Climate Emergency”?
     
    Jack Hays likes this.
  12. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    5,579
    Likes Received:
    2,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Do you find the WUWT material too difficult?
     
    Sunsettommy likes this.
  13. dgrichards

    dgrichards Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2020
    Messages:
    1,172
    Likes Received:
    539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You have done what many posters on this forum have done. You cherry pick data that fits in with your mind set, ignoring literally mountains of data in opposition. You present it as proof of your position. All I did was determine that the poster is agenda driven, much as Fox is, and everything reported by Fox, or this blogger must be taken with a huge grain of salt. Having repudiated the site it self, it would be redundant to repudiate the article. Find a better source if you can. This one is garbage.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2021
    MJ Davies likes this.
  14. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    I stand by the article I posted, agree with it and it is honestly written..

    You have yet to answer the simple question, or make specific rebuttal to any part CONTENT of the article, the one that so far YOU have not done at all.

    Where Is The “Climate Emergency”?
     
  15. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    I accept the fact that you are unable to address the content of the article, which means it remains unchallenged and your complaints thus invalid.

    The question is clearly to hard for you to answer.

    Cheers.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2021
  16. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    5,579
    Likes Received:
    2,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Unsettled, Steven Koonin’s new book
    Andy May
    By Andy May I was honored to be chosen by NYU Professor Steven E. Koonin to review his wonderful new book, Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What it Doesn’t,…

    ". . . Much of the book is spent dispelling the myth that extreme weather events are increasing due to human-caused climate change. He relates that heat waves are not more common today than they were in 1900, tornados are not trending up, nor are droughts. Koonin criticizes the media for claiming that extreme weather is somehow related to human activities, when it is clear there is no evidence to support this.

    Holman Jenkins of the Wall Street Journal also read a draft of the book and has written this, based on an interview with Koonin:

    “Koonin argues not against current climate science but that what the media and politicians and activists say about climate science has drifted so far out of touch with the actual science as to be absurdly, demonstrably false.” (Jenkins, 2021) . . . "
     
    Robert and Sunsettommy like this.
  17. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    66,891
    Likes Received:
    16,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What is stopping you right this instant from removing CO2 from the atmosphere and oceans?
     
  18. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    66,891
    Likes Received:
    16,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What has happened that you address is that when science does not prove what alarmists declare, they resort to attacking the scientists contradicting their warped views.

    Clear win for your posts.
     
    bringiton, Mrs. b. and Sunsettommy like this.
  19. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    66,891
    Likes Received:
    16,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    SHOW US. WHERE IS THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY?
     
  20. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    66,891
    Likes Received:
    16,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Amazing but false prediction.
     
  21. Moonglow

    Moonglow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    18,251
    Likes Received:
    6,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The climate emergency is reflected in the high electric bills.
     
    gabmux likes this.
  22. dgrichards

    dgrichards Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2020
    Messages:
    1,172
    Likes Received:
    539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Awe, c'mon! We just went through this in another thread. The source is johnny one note agenda driven blogger. I would no more trust it let alone read it. Give me a reliable source and I will be happy to read it. Bet you can't do that!
     
    gabmux likes this.
  23. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    It is clear you have offered ZERO rebuttals against the article, just unsupported opinions.

    Your fear of it is noted, it is a reason why you are ignorant.

    The Article remains unchallenged.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2021
  24. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    It appears some people have a deep fear in addressing the article, not even reading it or discuss the contents of it, I will post a section and ask question about it maybe that be enough for scared warmist/alarmists to finally respond:

    [​IMG]

    Is this true or false and explain your answer.
     
  25. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Here is the sum total of NOTHING, all from dgrichards:

    My reply in Italics and bolding,

    "This is a link to a blogger whose main if not only purpose is to debunk anthropomorphic climate change. Not quite a reliable source for fact based science. I know this because I did not stop at the link, I went quite a bit farther. Sometimes the danger of relying on one unchecked,, un fact checked link leaves you open to unwisely relying on some ones deranged notion as defensible facts. Sorry you fell for this one."

    You didn't offer any rebuttal to the CONTENT of the article. Article remains unchallenged

    ==

    "What in the hell leads you to the conclusion that I did not read the article? I see that you offer no rebuttal. I've done my research, do yours!"

    I posted the article, I agree with it. You didn't offer any rebuttal to the CONTENT of the article. Article remains unchallenged.

    ==

    "You have done what many posters on this forum have done. You cherry pick data that fits in with your mind set, ignoring literally mountains of data in opposition. You present it as proof of your position. All I did was determine that the poster is agenda driven, much as Fox is, and everything reported by Fox, or this blogger must be taken with a huge grain of salt. Having repudiated the site it self, it would be redundant to repudiate the article. Find a better source if you can. This one is garbage."

    You have done what many warmist/alarmists do is avoid posting a real rebuttal to the article I post. You make unsupported claims, make fallacious statements and .....You didn't offer any rebuttal to the CONTENT of the article. Article remains unchallenged.

    ==

    "Awe, c'mon! We just went through this in another thread. The source is johnny one note agenda driven blogger. I would no more trust it let alone read it. Give me a reliable source and I will be happy to read it. Bet you can't do that!"

    Your continued fear of addressing the article you complain about makes you appear irrational and uninformed. No one forced you to read it or post empty whiny evasive baloney. You could have stayed away since you are trolling my thread with NOTHING!

    You didn't offer any rebuttal to the CONTENT of the article. Article remains unchallenged

    You are very embarrassing, suggest you slink away.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2021
    Jack Hays likes this.

Share This Page