Whistleblower Has Three Potential Biases Against Trump

Then you should have no problem granting due process, which you desperately don't want.

Only a scum, unworthy of being an american would deny it, or cheer a congress for doing it.
Team sports

 

For investigating Crowdstrike?

 

Due process is for the accused. It's for those accused of a crime and rarely is anyone accused unless they have probable cause of committing a crime. So are you saying Trump probably committed a crime hence the scrutiny of the law being brought against him? Oops. The constitution is large there to protect the unpopular and criminals. It's not a high bar to defend the president with. Duh. More over, this is a political process, not a legal one so that doesn't really apply anyway.

 

You know it!

 

Not the opportunity to defend it
Do it right

 

Spin.

 

No, you are.

 

Due process doesn’t apply. It’s not a criminal court.

 

Have fun enforcing your subpoena

 

Spin.

 

It's a hoax.

 

Whoops. Nope, I never said he committed a crime. Impeachment isn't a criminal process nor do you have to be proven or even commit a crime to be impeached. You can be impeached for being really bad at your job. I don't know if Trump committed a crime on the Ukraine call. I'm inclined to say know. What he did do was use a position of power to gain something of value. That's an offense against his office that you wouldn't stand to allow if a certain African American president had done it and rightly so. Therefore, impeachment pie it is my friend.

 

Trump handed over the transcript of the call which the whistle blower claimed existed. There is no longer any need for the whistleblower’s identity. If Trump had claimed the call was never made and demanded to face his accuser, then I would agree he had that right. Now, it doesn’t matter. It’s like a bank robber providing a video of the bank robbery then demanding to interview the camera.

 

Great.

Give me the verbatim "quid pro quo" out of the transcript.

 

LoL!

I asked what the statute was, and you're the one who gave us "statutory rape".

Are you ok?

 

Have fun putting punitive teeth in it

 

Those words were in your posts, none of mine

 

538 impeachment tracker.

 

Can you clarify what you mean by due process?

 

Explain it to a judge

 

You can just say you have no idea and are just parroting silly whitehouse talking points. It’s not like anyone would be surprised.

 

Explain it to a judge when you dont get what you want. But you ain't going to a judge, ....are you?

 

Explain what?

 

Please post the statute where a President can't request another country we have a treaty to mutually investigate corruption, investigate another person political rival or not? You say it's a crime.

 

So what's the crime, please post the statute?