Sadly US Government is not a friend of people who need help. In Scandinavia and Canada, disabled people do get help.
The number of people who died due to Joseph Stalin's Penal Systems is -- 0.7 million executed -- 1.7 million died in camps -- 1 million died in exile The number of civilians killed by USA is comparable: -- 0.7 million in Japan 1945 -- 1.0 million in Korea 1950-1953 -- 1.0 million in Southeast Asia
So, now you are trying to use a single invention to prove that humans aren't inherently lazy? No thanks, not interested in your mental cart-wheels and moving of goal posts to try and defend your illogical points. You are in complete denial and living in lala land if you believe you can provide people everything they need to be sustained and they will continue to be productive.
SO.. no? You can't do customer service. You can't write for a political outlet? You can't do anything? I have a disability too. I have panic attacks in certain situations, including when I feel trapped in an environment. I work every day and take medication. Sorry, no. If a quarter of the populace is not working due to a disability, the majority of them are scamming the system.
The point is that food shelter education and healthcare are not all that is needed to sustain us as individuals and collectively. The underachievers and those without ability have always and will always be with us. You choose to suggest everyone is a secret underachiever, which perhaps is from your direct anecdotal experience. I view history and human achievement and see a completely different human character. Besides isn't consumption a principle need for capitalism to succeed?
Your right, it isnt enough for the collective, but that is all you will get out of many individuals. So you desire to provide all of those things for lazy people, provided by the over achievers? You cant see how your agenda ENCOURAGES dependency and DISCOURAGES success? When consumption exceeds production, which is exactly what you desire to create, it is unsustainable.
and what fallacy did I commit? See, you couldn't actually explain that, I know. Good ol' lefties. Never at a loss for attempting to shovel their own graves a bit further.
And I see we have arrived at the end of logical debate. Let's see if we can break this down in small bits. I said "When consumption exceeds production, it is unsustainable". What part of that is "utter bullshit"? How can you consume more than you produce? See, the problem is, like always, the left runs out of other people's money. And here we are, in a discussion of consumption and production, and you call simple basic definitions bullshit. Hmm. Telling.
Stating the sky is blue is one thing. A fallacious strawman is yet another. And if the right seems to be doing a pretty good job of running out of other people's money as well, if the current trumpian deficits are any indication. My, those bumperstickers can be a petard at times.