Why are people in the middle east considered white?

I dont understand the joke.

 

Then you need to study more

 

I need to study what more?

 

The subject you step into

 

Can you back that up?

- - - Updated - - -

You are just making stuff up.

- - - Updated - - -

No. .....

 

I'm travelling back from Algiers ATM and its difficult to go over my documents as I'm on my smartphone but, blumenback is supposedly a proponent in the Caucasian master race fraud, I'll get back to you tomorrow ok, can you wait that long?

 

Of course.

 

how, by saying Negroids are the master race instead?

 

Forensics 101: Race Determination Based on the Skull

DateTuesday, July 10, 2012 at 03:00AM | by AuthorJen J. Danna


The three key factors required to identify skeletal remains are age, sex and race. In previous Forensics 101 posts I’ve reviewed age estimates of an adult versus a pre-pubescent victim, age estimates based on epiphyseal fusion, adult age based on the pelvis, and sex determination based on features of the pelvis and skull. The final aspect of general skeletal identification is race.

Physical anthropology considers that there are six main races—black, white, American Indian, East Asian, Polynesian and Melanesian/Australian, but for simplicity’s sake, we’re only going to consider the first three as they are the most comprehensively described.

Racial differences in skeletal structure originally arose when small genetic changes developed in populations isolated by geography. Now, as world travel increases and people of different racial backgrounds intermix and produce children, it is becoming harder to differentiate individuals of different races. But there are some key features of the skull that can help forensic anthropologists:

◾Mouth: Whites tends to have smaller teeth, often with significant crowding and impacted third molars, and frequently exhibiting an overbite. Blacks rarely have crowding and the upper teeth often project outwards due to the angled shape of the maxilla. American Indians have well spaced teeth but often exhibit sclerosed dentition—when calcium deposits build up inside the tooth, thinning the root canal—leaving teeth loose within the mandible and easily cracked.

◾The palate and palatine suture: The hard palate is the bony structure at the top of the mouth bordered by the upper teeth. In American Indians, the palate is elliptical, with the ‘U’ shape angling in at the back teeth. In blacks, the palate is hyperbolic—a perfect ‘U’ shape with straight lines. And in whites, the palate is parabolic with the ends of the ‘U’ flaring outwards. The transverse palatine suture that horizontally transects the palate also varies by race: It is straight in American Indians, curved in blacks, and a jagged line in whites.



◾Incisors: The shape of the incisors is the most important indicator of race in the teeth. In American Indians (and East Asians, both of Mongoloid ancestry), the incisors are shovel-shaped, named because the inner surface is scooped or curved. Black and whites both have blade-form incisors where the tooth has a flat profile.

◾The nose: The nose provides multiple race indicators. In whites, the nasal aperture is long and narrow, with a high bridge and a sharp nasal sill (the lower edge of the nasal aperture projects sharply outwards). In blacks, the nasal aperture is short and wide with a low bridge and a guttered or trough-like nasal sill. In American Indians, the nasal aperture is medium-sized with both a medium bridge and nasal sill.



◾The mastoid process: The shape of the mastoid process differs between the races. In blacks, the bony projection is wide, in whites it is narrow and pointed, and in American Indians, a secondary smaller projection forms on the back surface of the mastoid process.




Rarely do all of these indicators point firmly to a single race. Instead, it is the story told by the majority of physical characteristics that suggests the victim’s ethnic background. If in doubt, additional post-cranial (skeletal features in the rest of the body) can help indicate race as well.

 

it doesn't take a genius to see that some folks in the Middle East are light skinned-Caucasians, while others are dark skinned Caucasians, some mixed-Caucasian/Negroid, and a few are pure black African.

 

blumenback is kind of hard to pin down. it appears his work was in latin and all ican find is commentaries about his work. From what ican gather, he only alludes to so- called whites as superior in terms of physical appearance and that alone is based off his skull samples which in itself is nothing short of retarded. It seems to be that his classifications are the precursors to modern day racism. all in all he was a bit of a fraud with silly ideas that racists jumped onto. his term 'caucasian' is now not used in academic circles and the only ppl who use that term are white racists and very old ppl stuck in the past.

 

Why are you accusing me of being racist? Nothing I said in the OP was demeaning to any ethnicity or group of people.

Yes, all people are humans, but many scientists believe that humans should be classified into different categories based on physical characteristics. Theres nothing demeaning about that-its just the truth.

 

Political correctness has semantically shifted the term to "West Eurasian population". It's exactly the same thing under a different term.

 

another term for political correctness could be "not digging your own grave"

 

Yes, the anti White PTB are very ruthless in their career destruction of those that don't follow their sick agenda.

After all Ashley Montague (aka Israel Ehrenberg) said race doesn't exist, so now scientists call Caucasoids "West Eurasians".

 

brother, you are not helping the predicament. isolation especially on such a small island will only lead to one thing, death by inbreeding. you need to grasp the world in both hands because it is yours to do with it how you please, to survive.

 

No I'm pretty sure mulattoization of Europeans will lead to state failure followed by Jew/Arab invasion which is the true agenda of Jew pseudoscience nutcases babbling nonsense like "death by inbreeding".

 

Where have I accused you of being racist, please do quote where I do that.

There is only one race .. the human race.

 

You said this.

 

I disagree. There are a lot of significant physical differences and similarities in different geographic areas. For example, people who live in the Arctic areas of Canada/US, Greenland natives, have slanted eyes and similar looking features to people who live in Eastern Asia (both Northeast and southeast asia). They are the same race.

People native to Europe, and SOME people who live in some areas North Africa and west asia, have similar looking features. They are not the same race as Asians. People in sub saharan africa are black.

There's nothing demeaning about classifying certain groups of people as being a certain race. It's no different from classifying different species into different subspecies. Yes, all members of different races are humans, but they have different physical characteristics.

 

youre not making any sense in reality

 

Human is a subspecies which divides into races.

 

It usually helps to explain rather than say "no it isn't".

 

How is humans a subspecies? Humans is a species.

 

Homo sapiens sapiens is a subspecies. Homo sapiens neanderthalensis is another.