Why did Larry Silverstein admit to designing the new WTC7 in 2000?

Discussion in '9/11' started by SamSkwamch, Mar 19, 2016.

  1. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,247
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah I saw that, it goes along with Lucky Larry calling the insurers on 9/11/01 asking them about the CD of WTC7. But don't worry, you will soon get a whole slew of excuses from rabid OCT defenders as to why no one should even bat an eyelash over these facts.
     
  3. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yep ... Silverstein devised the whole plan ...

    why wouldn't he redesign WTC 7 ... an obsolete building and the real estate was ripe for air rights ...

    and nothing but hearsay from a truther crank on the supposed overheard phone call ...

    sorry Bob ... no facts ... just more truther spin on non issues ...
     
  4. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I must be a psychic, damn I'm good.
     
  5. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,247
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why do you think he redesigned the building in 2000? And why was it in Tel Aviv that he made this known? And why has not one mainstream source in America asked these questions?
     
  6. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    no, you're not very good Bob ... you just keep applauding the confirmation bias that you agree with while ignoring all the real facts presented to you ...
     
  7. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,466
    Likes Received:
    2,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    His call to insurers is not a fact it is a baseless fantasy claim.

    Typical twoofer confusion about facts and gossip
     
  8. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure I am, I predicted someone would post what I expected. I was 100% sure and voila, my prediction came true in less than an hour. I even had a couple of candidates in mind and you were one of the top two on my list.
     
  9. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    but I didn't defend the "OCT" Bob, I just countered more misleading troofer BS ...
     
  10. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For the same reason the posters I predicted don't ask any questions that might open up a 9/11 can of worms. They never do, they just spend a lot of time attacking/denigrating those who do ask questions.
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,466
    Likes Received:
    2,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They stated facts you stated fiction.
     
  12. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    See what I mean? I'm usually 100% accurate about these posters. There is nothing anyone can post that blatantly contradicts the OCT that would lead to any question(s) from these posters about the OCT, it's always black and white. If you question the OCT, you're wrong (not to mention you're a "twoofer" or worse) because you're dealing in fiction but if you defend the OCT and denigrate those who don't buy it, you're right because the OCT is absolute fact. It doesn't even matter that besides the thousands of blatant contractions, tens of thousands of documents/pieces of evidence are being hidden about 9/11. Whatever is available as published by the US government is fact and nothing that is being hidden can ever change anything regardless that no one knows what is actually being hidden.

    These posters are irrelevant anyway other than to distract/derail any discussion contrary to the OCT.
     
  13. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,816
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    63
    You're not in a position to be sure about anyting. An objective truth-seeker would be suspicious. He wouldn't just rule out the idea that he knew building seven was going to be demolished. No objective person could say what you are saying with a straight face.


    Here's the info on building seven in case there are any newcomers to the issue. If the links don't work, do YouTube searches on the titles.

    Architects and Engineers: Solving the Mystery of Building 7 - w/ Ed Asner
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nyogTsrsgI

    September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M
    (4:30:48 time mark)

    Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg

    US Criminal Regime: Expert 9/11 Witness, Danny Jowenko, Ordered Murdered
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiA5OYdHneA
     
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hey Scott, I just checked out the above video for the first time and I have a couple of major issues with it.

    1. The beginning of the video shows what it says are RDX/thermite flashes at WTC7. I've seen many videos of WTC7 and none of them show/corroborate these flashes at any time, much less describe these as RDX or thermite flashes.

    2. The video claims Jowenko was ordered murdered, however it does not go into any detail as to what would lead one to believe he was ordered murdered. There are tens of thousands of others, including many experts who believe WTC7 was CD'd but none of them have been murdered to my knowledge, why would he be a special case to the extent that he needed to be murdered for his opinion? Jowenko had no inside knowledge whatsoever, he just stated his opinion based on his expertise with CDs.
     
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,816
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I never looked into that kind of detail. If I remember corrrectly there was a doctored video put out a few years ago to cause confusion in the truth movement. That might have been footage from that video put in before the makers of the video knew about the scam. He does describe the nature of the fall though. That's the part of the video I was paying attention to.

    It just looks suspicious. They may have wanted to set an example to reduce the number of professionals that publicly analyzed the fall of building seven; they couldn't start killing them one by one as it would have been too clear that they were being killed. In these cases we can't be sure about anything though; the accident might have been real.
     
  16. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    post some actual facts and hard evidence which us "OCT Defenders" can do on a regular basis and we might take you seriously ... lack of facts (such as your global collapse theory) are not facts but mere conjecture yet you fail to provide any actual facts about how the CD's could have taken place ... show us how the explosives could have been planted and/or how they could have survived the impacts ... you have nothing ... and you never will ...

    bah at a new investigation ... you and tour cronies should know by now that your ridiculous theories hold no water ...

    bring hard evidence or just admit you hold onto a troofer agenda Bob ...
     
  17. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I love the video where Jowenko is surprised that WTC 7 happened the same day as 9/11 ... yeah, like he wasn't paying attention ... just another part of the clownshoe brigade ... lol ... useful tool ...

    why not go back to the Loose Change vids? ... how many versions of that BS now? ...

    show me those "pods" again ... lmfaaaao ...
     
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whether YOU take me seriously or not is of no concern to me. I can live with that and won't lose a minute of sleep over it, trust me on that. You said that I have nothing for you and I agreed so let's keep it that way, shall we? I will also add that YOU have nothing for me either so we're on the same page.
     
  19. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The doctored video you're referring to and this new one are not the same so I tend to think this one was doctored as well. The previous one was allegedly newly found 8 mm film.

    I agree that it might be suspicious but I lean heavily into that it was just an accident. It wouldn't make any sense that a CD expert from Denmark would be targeted for an assassination merely for stating his professional opinion while many others who have done the same in the US are still alive. I'm pretty sure it doesn't serve as any kind of deterrent to other experts who voice their opinions that WTC7 was CD'd because there is nothing that shows he was assassinated by any sinister entity. If he actually had some inside knowledge, that might be another matter but he wasn't even familiar with WTC7 in the first place. And the cherry on the cake that makes the entire video a crock is that it even names Obama as the guy who ordered his execution, all without any detail whatsoever. Unfortunately, it sounds very much like a video being used to discredit those who believe WTC7 was CD'd.
     
  20. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    that's because you want to address innuendo and coincidence but refuse to discuss the facts ... the facts scare your agenda Bob ...

    quit trying to grasp at straws ... posit a theory or (*)(*)(*)(*) ...
     
  21. Anon00001

    Anon00001 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2016
    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Because Larry Silverstein and a bunch of Jewish extremists decided to blackmail Islam and use their financial & media outlets to create a war against Islamic extremists … Why? Israel, money … Something to do. Literally, when you're a billionaire you tend to become so apathetic & bored by all the power that no mortal man should possess that you end up scheming for "religious" and political movements—unless you're a shamanic muse, which 99% of people with financial power (a false tacit of sorcery misrepresenting potential, value, and merit) are not, cannot, and will not ever even dream of being. Instead, they use PR reps, highly calculated dialogues, photoshoots, edited articles, languages, and business organizations to pretend they are something of merit.
     
  22. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You said I have nothing for you and I agreed but you insist you want something from me, nearly every post, almost to the point of begging. Is there something you don't understand about I have nothing for you and you have nothing for me? If you recall you're the one who first made that claim, maybe you forgot. You really are confused son, get a grip.
     
  23. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I should qualify the above to say I'm certainly no fan of Obama. The guy after all is still complicit in covering up 9/11 by his failure to release at the very least the 28 redacted pages as promised more than once to the 9/11 families. Saying "we're looking into it" is not a fulfillment of that promise since it's years since the promise was made.

    http://28pages.org/2014/08/18/obamas-unkept-promise-to-911-families-declassifying-28-pages/
     
  24. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,816
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    63
    That's a tactic that they use. If I'd noticed that, I wouldn't have posted it. I'll take that video off my list.

    It's one of those things we can't be sure about. There have been some mysterious deaths though.
    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9/11+witnesses+mysterious+deaths

    Anyone who educates people on a large scale is taking a risk.
     
  25. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,193
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are much bigger fish than Jowenko who fit that characteristic though, Richard Gage, Niels Harrit, Steven Jones, David Chandler, Ed Asner, Graeme MacQueen, Kevin Ryan, David Ray Griffin, etc. and whistle blowers such as Sibel Edmonds and Susan Lindauer and they're still around and continue to educate people about 9/11. And those who might be suspected to have been killed have already done the damage, their statements/claims can't be erased. I'm not saying that some who may have inside information have not been murdered, especially if that information has not been made public, but if that's the case, we don't know about it.
     

Share This Page