Why does Giggles the socialist need so much campaign cash?

I mean..how about letting your dysmal record speak for itself Obummer. Do you need all this cash to hire spin doctors to try to bamboozle the public into forgetting your atrocious disservice to our country? Disgusting. Dont you all agree that this jerk should be WORKING instead of attending DNC fundraisers?

 

Communist.

.............

 

1. Can you do the left a favor? The right wing has been pulling the socialists/communists/marxist card for the last 80 to possibly 110 years. It's getting old and it doesn't work. Can you think of something new?
2. He's still the POTUS, even while campagaining.
3. Well, it may be a hunch, but he needs money, in order to buy, rent, lease stuff, or getting speakers, security, food, etc. for his campaigain.

 

Well then prove to me Ostupid isnt a socialist..can you?

 

First prove that you've stopped beating your wife.

 

So by shifting the argument...you cant prove it. Thanks for the confirmation

 

There really isn't an argument, just a nonsensical juvenile tirade that reads like a 5th grade insult.

 

I dont see how its any different from liberal doofas's ridiculous claims that Chairman O is a great President. When asked what he did..they just repeat that he's great

 

Socialist? Obam is a RIGHT WING TOOL, at best he's a RIGHT OF CENTER moderate.

 

Since when did "right of center" embrace Islam, gay marriage, and collectivization?

 

Why does Giggles the socialist need so much campaign cash?

To further Zionist Imperialism, like usual

 

Total error right here^^^^^

 

Just because marxism decided that its better to let someone own a business in name only, while taking away every single possible decision of that business owner through punishing taxation and regulation does not make it any more palatable an ideology or any less a threat to freedom. It also does not make the marxist a capitalist.

True freedom means more social darwinism and less social activism.

"Welfare Capitalism" is de facto socialism.

 

I think this thread just broke the record for meaningless slogans per page.

 

There isn't much substance to debate when the topic starts out with "Giggles the socialist."

I think "Giggles the socialist" sounds like a clown. What kind of clown were you thinking about? Where would it rate on the cool, funny, scary, boring clown scale?

 

This should answer your question

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=md_n8_xj3DI

 

Plenty of conservatives are gay, many support gay marriage, most conservatives embrace freedom of religion, which includes Islam...the ********** variety are a warped version of conservatism that would make Barry Goldwater puke. Give one, JUST ONE example of Obama's "collectivization", just one.

 

I wish Giggles was a SOCIALIST, I voted for him hoping that he was, but he is not, he's a right of center moderate, who has changed nothing. His approval rating right now would be way higher if he had actually rammed some socialism down the Tea party's throat when he had the votes to do it, that's where he failed, he could have been the next FDR, but he chose to be Bill Clinton Light. If it was the '60s, Obama's ideas whould make him a right wing Republican.

 

He needs a billion dollars to win? Complaining about the wealthy one day and raising millions the next is disingenuous.

 

Why does any candidate need so much cash?

The best person to hold office is probably not a rich guy, but a rich guy is all we're gonna get.

What's the phrase? Don't hate the player, hate the game.

 

Everyone needs a billion dollars to win. That's a symptom of the top 1% corruption of the government. They needed a way to balance out the fact that the middle class and poor out number them substantially. Their biggest enemy is that one person still equals one vote. So they balance the scales in their favor by putting money into politics. It doesn't matter anymore what your convictions are. If you want the job you have to play the game.

Which is why the second part of your opinion is invalid.

 

If that's the system then what are you supposed to do? Just quit?

If a populist leftist wants to go after Wall Street if elected president, you'd say he's a hypochrite for raising big money to do it. But if he doesn't raise big money, then he can't do it! It's like any right wing nut job calls out rich guys for supporting the middle class or the poor, but you can't be president if you're not a rich guy to begin with. That's so convenient, anybody who has the resources to run for president can't oppose rich people or he's a hypochrite....beautiful. This pretty much gaurantees that there can never be a president who would genuinely side with the poor or middle class vs. the rich.

 

So you want me to prove a negative?

 

Well, your the one sayin he isnt one...prove it..I didnt think this was going to be that difficult for you

 

If you're confident he is then show us how you know. Don't make an assumption and then act surprised when you're challenged on it. You said it, you prove it.