Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Josephwalker, Jun 25, 2018.
Yes, 'tis true.
I don't have the balls to simply dismiss NASA's data.
Please don't hurt me.
Anyway, even though gravity totally screws your professors opinion, this might be interesting: https://sciencing.com/make-liquid-co-5192428.html
Since you love NASA meteorologist so much you might enjoy this. You can argue about how much C02 the ocean takes care of but not the fact that it does. This site is perfect because it's right at your level. Just for kids.
"Ocean plants take in the carbon dioxide and give off oxygen, just like land plants. The ocean is great at sucking up CO2from the air. It absorbs about one-quarter of the CO2 that we humans create when we burn fossil fuels (oil, coal, and natural gas.) If not for the ocean, we'd be in even worse trouble with too much CO2."
Obviously my comment went right over your head, Wooosh!
Without clicking you're link, you've already brought plants into the picture.
Do you have a point?
Stumped for a rational reply when faced with facts ? Pretending you know more about AGW then NASA and every accredited university in the world, that’s the height of braggadocio. Only the really uninformed don’t know what they don’t know.
You sidestepped gravity and introduced plants, did you not?
You sidestepped oceans sucking up C02 did you not?
How would oceans suck up CO2 when gravity doesn't work in their favor, but opposite?
Like this. Any other questions?
Southern Ocean sucks up more carbon dioxide than was thought
Remote ocean has doubled its intake of the greenhouse gas since 2000, reversing an earlier decline.
You don't even know what you believe.
Is this all you guys do ? Suck up to an obscure study from the past that are irrelevant to the opinions on AGW by the publishing body itself. Didn’t you read the article in its entirety ? Guess not. It double from 5% to 10% and still, makes no significant change in the prognosis of the final outcome of AGW.
There are no countries in the world that agree with you. Deniers exist only in the political side of a debate among the most uninformed of the GOP. No accredited schools, no national corporations, no one with half a brain and without a political agenda agrees with you. <Rule 3>
He’s from the right wing of the political spectrum that only believes in throwing s.h.i.t against the wall.
You cultist are so emotional. I merely responded to claims that the ocean doesn't suck up C02. Take deep breaths. Oh wait! Don't do that you'll exhale C02!!!!!!
He misses a lot mind you
And they blame our industry rather than the fact that humans are constantly breathing.
I will say it quickly. Besides the insult by blaming man, they don't even speak of the fact that humans are always breathing. I suggest over and over, plant more plants. If you cut down the Amazon, keep replanting it. Keep the environment lush with green plants. And please say a blessing for the farmers who in fact have to keep greening the planet as they increase crop sizes.
I hear about the sea will cover me up,. Where are the local warnings? Locals still want to approve more and more building permits very near actual sea level. What the hell is wrong with the city fathers if you are correct?
I've never yet encountered an individual who didn't 'hate the cult of AGW' simply because AGW forces them to feel guilty about their lifestyle. Or worse ... might at some point force them to adopt a less consumption heavy lifestyle.
IOW - it's always personal, and it's always self-motivated. Though most will deny this furiously. Not all, but most.
Nope. Consensus only leads to elaboration of existing knowledge. Breakthroughs require defiance of the consensus.
Wrong again. But I can't claim to have made any breakthroughs.
Separate names with a comma.