Why not mandate trigger locks and locked gun cases?

Such a proposal could never be enforced in a country where so many individuals legally own firearms. There are simply not enough law enforcement officers to carry out the inspections in a timely manner. Even if there were, mass shootings would still occur, because the culture of the united states is far more violent than the culture of the united kingdom.

 

The united states constitution appears unimportant to those that do not support the second amendment as currently interpreted. Why should those who would be directly and negatively affected by expected to have any greater regard for freedom of the press under the first amendment?

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...oaring/ar-AAxRpxk?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=HPCOMMDHP15
REad how it works in Mexico, and why the violence dwarfs ours.

 

the illogic astounds me. Your car has a radiator leak, so liberals demand laws to fix the bathroom pluming. The fix has nothing to do with the problem. Unrealistic expectation. Attack the NRA because the founding fathers made gun control illegal. Total and complete logical failure.

 

Exactly.

 

These are claims, not citations.
Try again.

 

They do, as you reject any idea other than your own talking points as a potential solution.
You, for instance, demand that all guns be banned. This won't happen and so the fact you waste time on the idea means more kids will die.

 

Usually, when you waste everyone's time and bandwidth, you're more creative.

 

You cannot cite a single SCotUS riling overturned by Heller.
Not one.
And you know it.

 

You cannot show this to be true.

 

Why do you waste your time with such nonsense?

 

You and your ilk openly seek a ban on all guns.
Why do you not recognize the fact that this proves the NRA, etc, is not peddling fear and propaganda?

 

Three you go, seeking a ban on rifles, handguns and shotguns again.
Why do you not recognize the fact that people like you proves the NRA, etc, is not peddling fear and propaganda?

 

The "solution" you seek does not do this.
Why do you advocate a useless "solution"?

 

You are fully aware of the fact a legal requirement to secure your firearms violates the constitution.

 

According to federal law we do.

 

Why? so you can say they're no good or don't matter?

Nations haver armed and disarmed routinely throughout history. Saying we have to put up with random massacres because there's too many guns or too many crazies, or it's crazy people's RIGHT to kill our children is not cutting it any more. The first thing government is instituted to do is to keep us SAFE. If government will not do what it must to keep madmen from slaughtering us at will it is time we got a new government. We have an election coming up and we must remember that the Republicans have placed themselves squarely in support of people who want to kill our children and ourselves. Make sure you VOTE and Vote the Republicans OUT of office in November

 

First, there is no right to kill.

Second, there is no evidence that government is keeping anyone safe by restricting private firearms ownership. If the case can be made that there are individuals who should not have access to firearms, the case can also be made that these individuals do not belong in society at all.

Third, the above does nothing to prove that other nations have ever had anywhere near the same number of firearms as is possessed by the united states.

Cease presenting nonsense, and actually back up the claims being made by yourself.

 

That is an ignorant statement. It makes me glad I am a republican.

 

WHich Federal Law is that? The Dick Amendment that limits the militia to those males under 45?

 

I see you know you cannot back up your claims. Thank you

See above.

 

10 U.S. Code § 246
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246

 

You cannot cite a single SCotUS riling overturned by Heller.
Not one.
And you know it.

 

'

Me too, I don't want you in my Party.

 

So your argument now is that the problem is insoluble, that we must simply give up and accept a constantly increasing number of random and senseless massacres of our children and indeed, all segments of our society?