Why there the second amendment is a farce believed by fools

So you defend the second amendment with your life, and they will only take your gun from your dead hand.

Well then they will indeed take your gun from your dead hand, because you have no weapon that can defend yourself from the government that has already decided that you can not have any weapon that can be used to defeat them.

That said, the second amendment is just a ruse believed by fools.

 

Sigh, I see where you're coming from, but I disagree with you. The government represents the people. The will of the people be done and their will defended by the Second Amendment.

 

Madison intended A2 to enable you to challenge the govt, the govt took this right away a long time ago, and the average NRA member has no fricking clue. They live in la la land

 

TheDonald is both right and wrong. A good sized hunting rifle can stop most armored vehicles, helicopters, or combat aircraft if they hit them in the right spot and are wielded by a skilled shooter.

 

You must not be aware how many people have already thwarted governments with small arms and determination.

 

The armored vehicle might well have missiles and a 3000 round per minute Gatling gun that could actually vaporize both you and your hunting rifle. This is what Madison said that you are entitled too. Hunting has NOTHING TO DO with the second amendment

 

The only government that matters in the USA is this one.

That said explain what governments with nuclear arms were overtaken by small arms

 

lol what foolishness. The govt defends the 2nd. Its never going anywhere.

 

Name one government that nuked its own people.

 

The government is only defending your right to have whatever they allow you to have. You are one of the brainwashed fools

 

Russia and Japan................though that's two not one

Chernobyl and Fukushima

 

hahahha...the govt is bound by the constitution. Secondly posse comitatus. You have one way to disarm me and one way only. Ask me nicely to disarm. Thats it.

 

Not their own though.

 

I would wager that if I was accompanied by 29 well led and drilled civilians with 30 caliber rifles that we could wipe out a Bradley fighting vehicle and its infantry squad. And probably capture the Bradley relatively intact. And suffer no more than 10 fatalities.

 

Gun wielders are going to go up against big bad Trump?

What a great idea.

 

Ah the favorite retort of the academic left who know nothing of war. **** kickers in Afghanistan ground our army to a halt. All you need is mem rifles and terrain.

Our army is built to fight soviet tanks on the planes of Central Europe.

 

Actually no they did not. U.S. forces had no real problems defeating enemy forces in Afghanistan.

 

The mujahideen repelled Russian invasion? Our political loss in Vietnam both come to mind?

 

The government is not bound by the second amendment that allows you to have any weapon needed to protect yourself against the government. In reality the government hand chooses what weapons you may own. Again you are brainwashed by the fake reality that is a lot more than news

 

A Bradley fighting vehicles chain gun can fire only 200 rounds per minute. And it can only launch a missile while stationary. And its missiles can't be used against extremely close targets

 

They would land a missile on your ass from the next state, Dad you have no clue. Your Remington is a toy in the real World

 

Who the hell mentioned the Bradley fighting vehicle, the government has 3000 round per minute guns mounted on driverless vehicles.

 

if thats true then why do I still have my guns and you are neutered to the point all you can do is whine about it anonymously on an internet forum?

 

Again, you only have guns that the government FULLY approves that you can have, otherwise you are a criminal.

Do you agree?

 

I was thinking of the Bradley because its one of the most common infantry vehicles in the U.S. Army.