Zero Evidence that 9/11 Was an Inside Job

Maybe so, but we still don't know. Therefore, it is ridiculous the attacks from the mainstains media in the way they've treated "truthers".

Yeah, we want the entire truth of their security failures if that is the only thing they were hiding. But...they're hiding.

 

Well, you've got to admit some of the truther theories are WAY OUT there. Dr. Judy Woods directed energy weapons . . . no planes actually hit the towers (ALL the videos of planes were faked), drones laden with explosives took them out, no plane at the Pentagon, Flight 77 was flown somewhere else and the crew and passengers were killed and the DNA was "said to be" recovered at the Pentagon. Val McClatchy's photo of the 93 crash was faked because the smoke plume isn't the right shape or size.

I'm sure you've heard a few of these. Of course no one can offer any PROOF, just opinion, conjecture, and innuendo.

That's part of the problem, they can't even agree on what they think happened. There battle cry seems to be "We don't know what happened but we KNOW it didn't happen the way "the government" said it did.

 

Well yes, there are ridiculous theories, but as I said, theories will flourish when the absolute truth is being whitewashed.

I know exactly what they are hiding. But this thread is in the opinion-lite section, so I won't divulge.

 

I admire decent theories. The crap thinking and lack of objectivity behind the usual politically based non-sense isn't even close to being able to be regarded as "respectable theories" (or, for that matter, "respectable beliefs"). If all the objectively rational people did was attend to debunking all the stupid bs that morons come up with and other morons latch onto, they wouldn't have time to do anything else.

.

 

Forgive me if this sounds confrontational, I don't mean for it to be but hop on over to the 9/11 sub forum with all the other people who seem to "know" exactly what "they" are hiding.

Especially if you have some proof or evidence to back up what you know. That seems to be the part most people lack.

 

Good answer, fellas!

 

What in the world does all that have to do with what is on the tape? What is approaching the building in the second video at 24 seconds is NOT an airliner. It is out in the open so what does all the analysis of the angles of the building have to do with it? What is key is that you see it approach the building and it's clearly no 757. The next thing you see is the explosion.

The first video shows the damage. It's not from a fully fueled 757. Plus, the hole isn't big enough for a 757. Now, that last bit wouldn't mean anything except that there was no debris outside the building. What happened to the wings? They sure didn't fold up and go in the building with the fuselage. They sure didn't penetrate the building so where's the debris? You won't find any video that shows airplane debris outside the Pentagon.

 

You should not take anything Max Cleland says seriously.

He was appointed to the 9/11 Commission in 2002 just weeks after losing his Senate reelection bid that he was widely reported as being extremely bitter about and blamed the Bush Admin. for distorting his record and demonizing him.

Also, Cleland actually seemed to think he was "entitled" to his Senate seat due to being a military veteran and triple amputee.

 

I see that the FBI could have stopped the plot, but nowhere does it say that the FBI supplied the explosives.

I just don't believe that the FBI could be involved in something like 9/11 without that information leaking out to the mainstream media. They would be all over that if it was actually a credible claim.

 

What does any of this have to do with the government being directly involved in 9/11?

 

Yes that would be correct. I admit that I have not taken much time to investigate the debunking of 9/11 evidence...all I know is that none of it has been verified as being remotely credible.

 

Don't misunderstand me, I am not a partisan. I just recognize the fact that there exists a right wing neo-conservative faction of the mainstream media.

 

Watch the last video of the former FBI Chief. Not only does he say the FBI supplied the bomb but that the FBI and CIA are responsible for many of the foreign "terror" attacks overseas against US targets.
It also states that the same FBI special agent supervising the 1993 attack was involved in the Kenyan bombing of the US embassy.
Don't forget that Kennedy was shot three times with one "magic" bullet.

 

Exactly. The government has a (*)(*)(*)(*) poor record of botching up small scale coverups like Watergate from nosy journalists. I find it hard to believe that something on the scale of 9/11 could have been covered up for this long without somebody squawking.

The truthers, in their indiscriminate paranoia of government, seem to overlook the nature of government: inefficiency.

 

No he wasn't.

Kennedy was hit by two bullets.

That has been very well established by both the ballistics tests available in the 1960s and decades later.

 

If want a real conspriacy to 9/11. Here you go.

The year 2001, The disclosure project, an organisation created to reveal UFOS. Gave a historical press conference. Four months later, 9/11 happened!

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8"]911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 - YouTube[/ame]

Explain how a blurry security camera that appears to be filming around 4 fps could possibly be used to accurately discern an object flying 700 mph into a building.
Explain all the eye-witnesses who saw a 757 crash into the pentagon.
Explain where all of the people on Flight 77 went. Have they taken a 10 year vacation to Antarctica?
Explain pictures of the wreckage around the pentagon that show 757 debris.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk"]9/11 Debunked: Pentagon Flight 77 Photo Evidence - YouTube[/ame]

 

Now this is a more believable explanation. No doubt that al qaeda was trained by US forces in the late 70s/early 80s. but still, i'd like to see evidence that the US govt trained them for the purpose of carrying out the 9/11 attacks.

 

That is nowhere close to being evidence of direct govt involvement in 911.

 

They did. FBI members pretended to be al Qaeda members from the start. They conceived the plan and entrapped that El Khalifi dude. Obviously the plot was never actually going to be executed. But it was in fact cooked up by the FBI, the El Khalifi dude was the only one who was serious about it.

I agree, you are correct.

 

There's a difference between wanting the full story about what the government knew about 9/11 and when it knew it, than claiming that the government directly hatched 9/11 and used target controlled demolitions, murdering 3000 innocent Americans in cold blood.

 

Interesting! So many false whistle-blowers! Nothing to see here, move along.

This nation has been compromised!

 

OK. So your source is a single FBI agent claiming that the FBI supplied the bomb for the WTC attack in 93. Is that evidence that government was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks?

The "magic bullet" was not magic at all. There was only one shooter and it was Oswald in the book depository building. Kennedy was hit by two bullets, one of them hit Connoly and Kennedy. Proven by ballistics tests and watching the Zapruder film.

 

What in the hell do UFO's have to do with 9/11?

 

I have read many conspriacys to 911. The so called inside job and frankly they bore me. I like the surreal, the conspiracies from minds like david icke and other greats.