![]() |
|
|
|||
|
American president Bush recently vetoed a bill that would stop the CIA from using waterbording and other techneiques outside of the US. President Bush says that it is these techneques that have prevented past attacks. I belive that the CIA should not break any human rights or perminatly injure a suspect, but I suppose it should use harsher techneques in emergency life or death situations for the US agents. What do you think
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
I think water boarding should be allowed. It does not permanetly harm anymore and does not subject them to any extreme pain. It puts them in extreme discomfort but that is it.
Also I do not care if we are water boarding people who have no problem cutting off our heads and broadcasting it on television. Plus I do not get the big deal with water boarding. Everybody acts like we do it all the time but it has not been used in years. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Dating back to the Spanish Inquisition, the technique has been favored because, unlike most other torture techniques, it produces no marks on the body. Information retrieved from the waterboarding may not be reliable because a person under such duress may admit to anything, as harsh interrogation techniques lead to false confessions. "The person believes they are being killed, and as such, it really amounts to a mock execution, which is illegal under international law," says John Sifton of Human Rights Watch. It is "bad interrogation. I mean you can get anyone to confess to anything if the torture's bad enough," said former CIA officer Bob Baer. So waterboarding gives the person the thought that they are indeed drowning. As the prisoner gags and chokes, the terror of imminent death is pervasive, with all of the physiologic and psychological responses expected, including an intense stress response, manifested by tachycardia (rapid heart beat) and gasping for breath. There is a real risk of death from actually drowning or suffering a heart attack or damage to the lungs from inhalation of water. So, as well the physical and psychological effects, this could actually kill. Now, I am not relying on Wikipedia as a 100% accurate source, but it seems plausible that waterboarding could cause permanent damage. I don't believe in torture of any kind, because I feel it lowers us, makes us no better than the terrorists themselves. And we cannot forget the possiblility, no matter how small, that we could be torturing an innocent person. Also, how can we be sure that a 'confession' from a terror suspect is the truth? And if the suspect you have in custody is innocent, what information could he possibly give you, even if he may be subjected to waterboarding? People will say anything to make the pain stop, so if indeed someone is innocent, and they tell you what you want to hear, and confess to terror activities just to make the pain end, what happens then? How does a person then prove their innocence despite admitting guilt? What happens when the false information given by an innocent terror suspect is discovered? What happens to the suspect?
__________________
Calling Grace She'll Never Fall Again Love Remains In Her Calling Grace She Will Rise Again Sacrifice The Saints Still Love Remains I'm A Tart! What! You Want Some Of This! I would |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A good gig, if you can get it | ArmedBlog | Political Blogs | 0 | 02-19-2008 11:20 PM |
| This is a good one.... | DuH2 | Current Events | 7 | 02-26-2007 04:14 PM |
| Am I good, or what? | raytri | Current Events | 10 | 01-20-2006 03:49 PM |
| MAYBE HE IS REALLY REALLY A GOOD GUY! | MUNKO-1970 | Political Opinions & Beliefs | 16 | 08-12-2004 06:19 AM |
| Sponsored Links |
|