Thread: the federal reserve killed jfk

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

again someone who is paid troll only wants to tell you that the fairy tale book the warren commission is evidence so they wont read any books or watch any videos that prove its a fairy tale.what cracks me up about his loony theory is even the HSCA admitted the warren commission was wrong and his death was the result of a conspiracy but were unable to locate the other shooter.He just wants to show off to the world his insane ramblings,why bother with him?

Wrong the HSCA identified a PROBABLE conspiracy they did not say his death was the result of a conspiracy.

In addition the HSCA based this conclusion on one and only one piece of evidence which has been proven false.

The fact is you are lying.

I have read all the material you have read and more.

Unlike you I objectively considered both sides of the argument and the content therein.

You on the other hand strictly and selectively stick to conspiracy material without ever checking it's validity or sources.

You have never read any other material and in fact you are only brainwashed to believe what you are told in knee jerk fashion.

None of your books or videos have refuted or proven the Warren Commission wrong they only tell you it is wrong and like a good troll and paid conspiracy shill you repeat it.

Unfortunately even here on these forums your beliefs have been debunked crushed and proven wrong which is why you only troll with meaningless posts.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

again someone who is paid troll only wants to tell you that the fairy tale book the warren commission is evidence so they wont read any books or watch any videos that prove its a fairy tale.what cracks me up about his loony theory is even the HSCA admitted the warren commission was wrong and his death was the result of a conspiracy but were unable to locate the other shooter.He just wants to show off to the world his insane ramblings,why bother with him?

The Warren Commision Report, is just like the 9/11 Commision Report, a f****** fairy tale for the sheople and government loyalists who need the current regime intact to keep those pay checks coming in.

Originally Posted by Soupnazi

Wrong the HSCA identified a PROBABLE conspiracy they did not say his death was the result of a conspiracy.

In addition the HSCA based this conclusion on one and only one piece of evidence which has been proven false.

The fact is you are lying.

I have read all the material you have read and more.

Unlike you I objectively considered both sides of the argument and the content therein.

You on the other hand strictly and selectively stick to conspiracy material without ever checking it's validity or sources.

You have never read any other material and in fact you are only brainwashed to believe what you are told in knee jerk fashion.

None of your books or videos have refuted or proven the Warren Commission wrong they only tell you it is wrong and like a good troll and paid conspiracy shill you repeat it.

Unfortunately even here on these forums your beliefs have been debunked crushed and proven wrong which is why you only troll with meaningless posts.

Blah, blah, blah...

The bullet holes in JFKs body, do not fit the WCR lone shooter theory...PERIOD!

Originally Posted by 10aces

Blah, blah, blah...

The bullet holes in JFKs body, do not fit the WCR lone shooter theory...PERIOD!

They do indeed and always have.

You simply believe what some ignorant theorist told you rather than study the evidence.

Facts prove you wrong face them and deal with them

[quote=Soupnazi;4355454]

They do indeed and always have.

Nope

You simply believe what some ignorant theorist told you rather than study the evidence.

Wrong again, I am also a shooter, who has reloaded his own ammo for more than 30 years.

Facts prove you wrong face them and deal with them

The WCR is NOT fact filled, it is a story for sheople and the naive

[quote=10aces;4362658]

Originally Posted by Soupnazi

Nope




Wrong again, I am also a shooter, who has reloaded his own ammo for more than 30 years.




The WCR is NOT fact filled, it is a story for sheople and the naive

Yep the bullet wounds to Kennedy and Connally line up consistently with the shots from Oswald and in no way contradict the WC's analysis. You are simply wrong and cannot cite one part of the report to support your claim because you have never read it and have no idea what it says.

This is why you can provide no specific evidence whatsoever that it is a story or lacking in facts.

It is a solid summary of an exhaustive investigation which you cannot hope to match or challenge and have not done so.

Before saying un- unnh try reading the thing and be specific when you state which part is false or wrong.

You know nothing about shooting despite your claims and you have proven that fact

[quote=Soupnazi;4362743]

Originally Posted by 10aces

Yep the bullet wounds to Kennedy and Connally line up consistently with the shots from Oswald and in no way contradict the WC's analysis. You are simply wrong and cannot cite one part of the report to support your claim because you have never read it and have no idea what it says.

This is why you can provide no specific evidence whatsoever that it is a story or lacking in facts.

It is a solid summary of an exhaustive investigation which you cannot hope to match or challenge and have not done so.

Before saying un- unnh try reading the thing and be specific when you state which part is false or wrong.

You know nothing about shooting despite your claims and you have proven that fact

Wrong again.

The wounds do NOT fit the single bullet theory, and you cannot change the wounds like the WC changed them to fit the single bullet BS theory.

Look at the photos and disregard the BS written.

The bullet in the back would have had an exit wound in the chest area had it exited.

[quote=10aces;4362861]

Originally Posted by Soupnazi

Wrong again.

The wounds do NOT fit the single bullet theory, and you cannot change the wounds like the WC changed them to fit the single bullet BS theory.

Look at the photos and disregard the BS written.

The bullet in the back would have had an exit wound in the chest area had it exited.

The wounds are quite consistent with the single bullet theory and the WC did not change them.

The photos do not dispute the written report.

The bullet entered the back and exited the throat which is not in dispute the medial evidence proves it and that is simple fact.

Once again you cannot point to any part of the WC which you have never read and refute it with credible evidence.

[quote=Soupnazi;4363047]

Originally Posted by 10aces

The wounds are quite consistent with the single bullet theory and the WC did not change them.

The photos do not dispute the written report.

The bullet entered the back and exited the throat which is not in dispute the medial evidence proves it and that is simple fact.

Once again you cannot point to any part of the WC which you have never read and refute it with credible evidence.

Never happened Ozian

[quote=10aces;4363106]

Originally Posted by Soupnazi

Never happened Ozian

Prove it.

The medical evidence proves it did.

What evidence do you have to prove the experts wrong?