Thread: The Real Jim Garrison

Some researchers have determined that David Ferrie was actually one of the
shooters on the grassy knoll and that Jim Garrison, who was Hoover's eyes and ears in New Orleans, was involved in the Kennedy assassination; Which explains his obsession to cover CONTROL th etruth.

http://ahabit.com/garrison



In other words, Jim Garrison was another Jack Ruby; one silenced Lee Oswald, the other silenced David Ferrie.


ISN'T THAT AMAZING ?

One of the best budgeted research projects in modern times was done with the help of a film director, Oliver Stone. Yes, at times, he led the movie JFK down a literary licence lane, but all in all, his work was much more factual than the Warren Report.

Stone did not seem to think, as far as I know, that there were skeleton's in Garrison's closet.

So, are we to believe, that Oliver Stone was also covering up for J. Edgar? I find that not very likely. However, corruption runs deep, and anyone with money, and I mean serious money, in their money clip, is beholding to someone in this screwed up mess we live in today. I know police officers that are drug smugglers. I know police officers that steal. I know of politicians that are embroiled in child kidnapping and worse.

For Stone to tell the story he told, as deep as he told it, would require a high level of protection, to keep him alive. Where did this protection come from, and what was traded for that protection, we can only ponder.

If you send a young lady to a dance, and you do not want lots of boys dancing with her, you need to arrange a dance partner for the girl to keep her moving on the dance floor, and the gentleman, would need to keep the direction of that dance away from other men wanting to cut in.

Suggesting Garrison is the gentleman in that dance, and the investigation was the maiden is something I will need to think about.

You would also need to buy off witnesses, and buy off a jury. Something that has been done before.

Questions:

What year did J. Edgar die? 1972

What year was the Garrison trial? 1969

Makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck.

He is as credible as the Warren Commission:

http://ahabit.com/garrison

Originally Posted by botenth

Some researchers have determined that David Ferrie was actually one of the
shooters on the grassy knoll and that Jim Garrison, who was Hoover's eyes and ears in New Orleans, was involved in the Kennedy assassination; Which explains his obsession to cover CONTROL th etruth.

http://ahabit.com/garrison



In other words, Jim Garrison was another Jack Ruby; one silenced Lee Oswald, the other silenced David Ferrie.


ISN'T THAT AMAZING ?

thats obviously all disinformation and propaganda to try and discredit Garrison.Garrison eyes and ears for Hoover? could not be any further than the truth.Everybody that knew Garrison knew he was a true patriot who tried to do the right thing.

So the DA of New Orleans was in on it too. That phone that's not ringing.....thats MENSA not calling.

Originally Posted by ar10

One of the best budgeted research projects in modern times was done with the help of a film director, Oliver Stone. Yes, at times, he led the movie JFK down a literary licence lane, but all in all, his work was much more factual than the Warren Report.

Stone did not seem to think, as far as I know, that there were skeleton's in Garrison's closet.

So, are we to believe, that Oliver Stone was also covering up for J. Edgar? I find that not very likely. However, corruption runs deep, and anyone with money, and I mean serious money, in their money clip, is beholding to someone in this screwed up mess we live in today. I know police officers that are drug smugglers. I know police officers that steal. I know of politicians that are embroiled in child kidnapping and worse.

For Stone to tell the story he told, as deep as he told it, would require a high level of protection, to keep him alive. Where did this protection come from, and what was traded for that protection, we can only ponder.

well government officials and the city of dallas DID try extremely hard to try and keep Stone from making the film you know? They couldnt kill him because that would open up a can of worms that Stone was on to something.Thats why they never killed garrison either because he had too many people behind him.when they cant kill you,they try and discredit you.They tried that many times over the years with Garrison and with Stone when he was making the film.Matter of fact when Stone was initially making the film,the first draft of the screenplay for the film was stolen.then later,a second draft of the screenplay got stolen as well.That was unprecedented in hollywood.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

well government officials and the city of dallas DID try extremely hard to try and keep Stone from making the film you know? They couldnt kill him because that would open up a can of worms that Stone was on to something.Thats why they never killed garrison either because he had too many people behind him.when they cant kill you,they try and discredit you.They tried that many times over the years with Garrison and with Stone when he was making the film.Matter of fact when Stone was initially making the film,the first draft of the screenplay for the film was stolen.then later,a second draft of the screenplay got stolen as well.That was unprecedented in hollywood.

Filming locations for
JFK (1991) More at IMDbPro »
ad feedback

Arlington National Cemetery, Arlington, Virginia, USA

Building One, Studios at Las Colinas - 6301 North O'Connor Road, Irving, Texas, USA

Dallas, Texas, USA

Dealey Plaza - 500 Main Street, Dallas, Texas, USA

Fort Worth, Texas, USA

New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

Washington, District of Columbia, USA

They tried so hard they gave him two permits to film in Dallas, one in Fort Worth, and another in Irving.

Welcome to Liar-ville, population you.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

well government officials and the city of dallas DID try extremely hard to try and keep Stone from making the film you know? They couldnt kill him because that would open up a can of worms that Stone was on to something.Thats why they never killed garrison either because he had too many people behind him.when they cant kill you,they try and discredit you.They tried that many times over the years with Garrison and with Stone when he was making the film.Matter of fact when Stone was initially making the film,the first draft of the screenplay for the film was stolen.then later,a second draft of the screenplay got stolen as well.That was unprecedented in hollywood.

I am so grateful for the ignore list.Stone and Garriosn had too many people behind them so they could not bump them off and kill them like they wanted to.when they cant kill you, they try and discredit you which is what they tried to do with Stone and Garrison.The media attacked garrison vicicously with lies and propaganda and pretty much made the rest of life miserable.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

I am so grateful for the ignore list.Stone and Garriosn had too many people behind them so they could not bump them off and kill them like they wanted to.when they cant kill you, they try and discredit you which is what they tried to do with Stone and Garrison.The media attacked garrison vicicously with lies and propaganda and pretty much made the rest of life miserable.

Good to see you run away from the "Dallas resisted" lie you just told. Happy Holidays.