Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Other Political Issues > Labor & Employment


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2006, 08:16 PM
Schwarzwald's Avatar
Schwarzwald Schwarzwald is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 800
Schwarzwald is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 7,449
Default Take Action

Some 57 million U.S. workers say they would join a union if they could. But when workers try to gain a union voice on the job, employers respond with intimidation, harassment and retaliation. And our labor laws are too weak to stop them.

Your U.S. representative is not among the 201 who have taken a strong stand to restore workers’ freedom to form unions by co-sponsoring the Employee Free Choice Act. This measure would ensure that when a majority of employees in a workplace decide to form a union, they can do so without the debilitating obstacles employers now use to block their free choice.

Workers need our elected officials to fight for workers’ rights by co-sponsoring the Employee Free Choice Act. Failing to support the act sends a strong message to employers and workers—that ruthless employers can continue to block workers’ basic rights with campaigns of intimidation, coercion, harassment and even firings.

Please use this Labor Day season to send the following message now urging your U.S. representative to co-sponsor the Employee Free Choice Act.


Summary of Employee Free Choice Act

1. Certification on the Basis of Signed Authorizations
Provides for certification of a union as the bargaining representative if the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) finds that a majority of employees in an appropriate unit has signed authorizations designating the union as its bargaining representative. Requires the board to develop model authorization language and procedures for establishing the authenticity of signed authorizations.

2. First-Contract Mediation and Arbitration
Provides that if an employer and a union are engaged in bargaining for their first contract and are unable to reach agreement within 90 days, either party may refer the dispute to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) for mediation. If the FMCS has been unable to bring the parties to agreement after 30 days of mediation, the dispute will be referred to arbitration and the results of the arbitration shall be binding on the parties for two years. Time limits may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties.

3. Stronger Penalties for Violations While Employees Are Attempting to Organize or Obtain a First Contract
Makes the following new provisions applicable to violations of the National Labor Relations Act committed by employers against employees during any period while employees are attempting to organize a union or negotiate a first contract with the employer:

a. Mandatory Injunctions: Provides that just as the NLRB is required to seek a federal court injunction against a union whenever there is reasonable cause to believe the union has violated the secondary boycott prohibitions in the act, the NLRB must seek a federal court injunction against an employer whenever there is reasonable cause to believe the employer has discharged or discriminated against employees, threatened to discharge or discriminate against employees or engaged in conduct that significantly interferes with employee rights during an organizing or first-contract drive. Authorizes the courts to grant temporary restraining orders or other appropriate injunctive relief.

b. Treble Back Pay: Increases the amount an employer is required to pay when an employee is discharged or discriminated against during an organizing campaign or first-contract drive to three times back pay.

c. Civil Penalties: Provides for civil fines of up to $20,000 per violation against employers found to have willfully or repeatedly violated employees’ rights during an organizing campaign or first-contract drive.

http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/Support_EFCA
__________________
“Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction. No universal selfishness can bring social good to all.” —Dr. W.E.B. Du Bois
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2006, 12:44 PM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 22,704
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 149,537
Default ?

Baloney. Unions are not strong in this country anymore....because they aren't needed. People get a better deal without them. That's why the membership has gone down and nobody wants to join.

Any intimidation is done by the surviving Union leaders.
__________________
“I’ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career. Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work.” — Barack Obama, Speech to ACORN, November 2007
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2006, 01:05 PM
justabubba's Avatar
justabubba justabubba is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,526
us north carolina
justabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 33,722
Default why the opposition?

Quote:
... they aren't needed. People get a better deal without them ...
if the working person is getting such a good deal from the fire at will employer, then why do they even seek Union representation and why do those benevolent employers, such as wal wart, fight so hard to keep the Unions out?
however, i do agree with this statement:
Quote:
Unions are not strong in this country anymore
but the reasons include the demise of the manufacturing industry, where unions were most established, laws established to prohibit governmental entities from negotiating with unions, and during this pro-big business paid for neocon regime, union busting behavior at every possible instance.
__________________
“Mayor Palin fails to have a firm grasp of something very simple: the truth.”
[Frontiersman editorial, 2/7/97]
quote removed per Anikdote request via the mod panel. how could he see it since he said i am on "ignore"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spare View Post
Well, that settles it ... who cares about facts?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2006, 01:06 PM
nawbut nawbut is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlantic
Posts: 4,205
nawbut is on a distinguished road
Credits: 21,209
Default fight

Your grandchildren will have to struggle to secure the same rights that your granparents fought for, and won.....and you gave away.
__________________
"A man's work is nothing but this slow trek to rediscover, through the detours of art, those two or three great and simple images in whose presence his heart first opened."
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2006, 03:26 PM
MerlinX's Avatar
MerlinX MerlinX is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 1,449
usa us california
MerlinX will become famous soon enough
Credits: 11,071
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by nawbut";p=&quot View Post
Your grandchildren will have to struggle to secure the same rights that your granparents fought for, and won.....and you gave away.
And yet ...

Quote:
Labor historians and activists would doubtless be at a loss to explain why, at a time when unionism was numerically negligible (a whopping three percent of the American labor force was unionized by 1900) and federal regulation all but nonexistent, real wages in manufacturing climbed an incredible 50 percent in the United States from 1860-1890, and another 37 percent from 1890-1914, or why American workers were so much better off than their much more heavily unionized counterparts in Europe. Most of them seem to cope with these inconvenient facts by neglecting to mention them at all.
http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?Id=1685
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2006, 08:02 AM
quiller's Avatar
quiller quiller is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,798
quiller is on a distinguished road
Credits: 16,447
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by MerlinX";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by nawbut";p=&quot View Post
Your grandchildren will have to struggle to secure the same rights that your granparents fought for, and won.....and you gave away.
And yet ...

Quote:
Labor historians and activists would doubtless be at a loss to explain why, at a time when unionism was numerically negligible (a whopping three percent of the American labor force was unionized by 1900) and federal regulation all but nonexistent, real wages in manufacturing climbed an incredible 50 percent in the United States from 1860-1890, and another 37 percent from 1890-1914, or why American workers were so much better off than their much more heavily unionized counterparts in Europe. Most of them seem to cope with these inconvenient facts by neglecting to mention them at all.
http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?Id=1685
Maybe they heard of this site, telling them the truth about unions...

National Right-to-Work Link

Or maybe they visited this U.S. Government site on the crimes committed by labor officials against their own members....

Criminal Actions Link

Unions are ongoing criminal enterprises, stealing wages from employers and consumers alike. You can not look at any U.S. made (UAW-made) crap-on-wheels automobile and tell me we deserve to be #1 against the foreign competition.
__________________
Delivering tasty bite-sized Clues to liberals since 1965.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2006, 08:21 AM
NJVet NJVet is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 437
NJVet is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,737
Default Can you imagine

Paying union dues out of your
$5.15 per hr min wage job. I
wonder if they have unions in
China? where all the crap we
buy at Wal-Mart comes from.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2006, 02:12 AM
Wildbore's Avatar
Wildbore Wildbore is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Thunder Bay, ON
Posts: 1,300
canada ca ontario
Wildbore has a spectacular aura aboutWildbore has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 9,285
Send a message via MSN to Wildbore
Default Unions rule!

I hope this Employee Free Choice Act passes. It will definitely help the US get its labour standards up to par.

Its almost a joke to hear of all the Americans without health insurance, a problem which could easily be helped with more unions. I would hate to be a blue collar worker in the US, getting hardly any vacation days, getting payed sqwat for a hard days work, having limited job security. The government doesen't even increase the minimum wage, how sad is that.

No wonder 57 million workers want more unions, so would I if I were getting screwed by big business everyday.
__________________
"The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. " — John Stuart Mill
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2006, 05:12 AM
AmericanMan AmericanMan is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 97
AmericanMan is on a distinguished road
Credits: 708
Default Not the answer

I would like to be a union supporter.
Sadly they are too cozy with the Dem's who control them completely.

I work for a company who has a union, and I am lucky not to be effected by the union BS.

I see the reletively unskilled persons who whine and cry about how bad they are treated by "The Company" when in truth if they found themselves
unemployed for any reason they would have nearly no marketable skills to fall back on. I see them sitting on their butts doing next to nothing in terms of productivity, and are a kind of poison to morale.
There is no way to get rid of this deadwood either.

The other aspect that keeps me away from unions is the corruption.
What has the unions done to prevent the exportation of American jobs?

I see nothing. Yet they are in lockstep with the Dem's, who value the importation of legal, and illegal immigrants to take more jobs.

When they begin to really join with American workers to fight for American
jobs, I will begin to take them serious. Not until.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 03:03 PM
douggiephresh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default reply

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p=&quot View Post
Baloney. Unions are not strong in this country anymore....because they aren't needed. People get a better deal without them. That's why the membership has gone down and nobody wants to join.

Any intimidation is done by the surviving Union leaders.
You are so full of it. I wouldnt get paid 1/2 of what I get paid doing what I do if I didnt have a union. What I do cannot be outsourced (contruction). If the contruction industry wasnt unionized, I can guarantee you that work quality would be half as well. Whenever you hear of contruction accidents, who is involved? non-union, cheap labor (illegal immigrants)
And you cant tell me that I dont deserve what I get paid. Its hard enough as it is living on Long Island if you didnt buy your house before the boom 10 years ago. Shouldnt a hard working man be able to buy a house and raise a family?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden