Thread: Watch out China your next!

Not that anyone in China will see their opinions anyway. The PRC has wikipedia blocked up I am sure. Heaven forbid that the Chinese masses should get access to an opinion the PRC doesnt like.

One of the nice things about Wikipedia is that you are expected to provide actual sources on there. Thats what those little numbers in brackets mean...they are links to the source of the claim.

Ya, members of this forum love wiki.

The way they talk on it, like they are viollently matsrerbating as they lick the computer monitor in their love for wiki.

Ya, members of this forum love wiki.

It isnt just this forum. Wikipedia is accepted as a valid source almost everywhere. For the reasons I already mentioned.

The way they talk on it, like they are viollently matsrerbating as they lick the computer monitor in their love for wiki.

It must be really annoying for you that people on here can use wikipedia to so easily dismantle your arguments.

Originally Posted by Sadistic-Savior

Not that anyone in China will see their opinions anyway. The PRC has wikipedia blocked up I am sure. Heaven forbid that the Chinese masses should get access to an opinion the PRC doesnt like.

One of the nice things about Wikipedia is that you are expected to provide actual sources on there. Thats what those little numbers in brackets mean...they are links to the source of the claim.

last time i went to china. i was able to get on wiki. it usually depend the mood of chinese government. sometime you can get on wiki, youtube etc, sometime not.

So why have you picked wiki to obsess over?

Which is used to back up all your claims, doesnt seem to matter if it is factless, it is wiki! it cant be wrong.

You yanks are crazy obsessives, but pick a better website, Bigtits.com much more deserving to obsess over.

So why have you picked wiki to obsess over?

What makes you think I am obsessing over it?

Which is used to back up all your claims

Not all of them, just most of them. And technically, it isnt wikipedia I am using...it is whatever source wikipedia is referencing. Since wikipedia includes it's sources.

doesnt seem to matter if it is factless

How did you determine it is "factless"?

pick a better website

Request denied. There is no better website that I have seen so far.

last time i went to china. i was able to get on wiki.

You can access the parts of Wikipedia that the PRC wants to allow you to access.

By contrast, you can access the entire site in the US. None of it is restricted here.

You are like a stuck record, wiki this, wiki that.

I am trying to understand why you are keeping on about it. And why give a (*)(*)(*)(*) anyway. Most of it is lazy and not taqken seriously only by the braindead morons who rely on it as they have no other clue what to do.
Maybe chatters like you are being paied to advertise on this forum, a dollar every time you say the word, WIKI!

You are like a stuck record, wiki this, wiki that.

All that evidence must be pretty painful for you. Dont worry, you'll get used to it on here.

I am trying to understand why you are keeping on about it. And why give a (*)(*)(*)(*) anyway. Most of it is lazy and not taqken seriously only by the braindead morons who rely on it as they have no other clue what to do.

As opposed to what...the biased opinion of anonymous users on the internet like you? LOL

Wiki is anonymous, and one of the reasons not to be taken seriously, like talking on forums like this. ok for a short time but you must be trolling, i cant believe anyone is this dumb.

No wonder the chinese will end up owning the usa, american intelligence is on the decline.