Thread: 'Iran ready to wipe Israel off the map'

Originally Posted by Khalil

Ah, so now you're changing the goal posts. You were unable to disprove the Rand report, so now as long as Americans are killed by Moslems anywhere in the world - even when not intended to target Americans - then it's U.S. soil! lol...

LOL, you are the one moving the goalpost, your original lie said nothing about Americans killed on the american soil, it claimed that no american was killed by muslim terrorists after 9/11.

Obviously the links I provided have displayed the utter absurdity of your claims, Americans have been killed by muslim terror in and outside of the US.

Originally Posted by Borat

I provided you with three links, each of them lists a ton of muslim terror attacks, their places, dates, descriptions, casualties. Can you dispute even one of these incidents?

How about this example (again it's one of many)

7/28/2006 USA Seattle, WA An 'angry' Muslim-American uses a young girl as hostage to enter a local Jewish center, where he shoots six women, one of whom dies.

That isn't a Jihadist. As the Rand report, shows how you cannot say that any attack from a Moslem in U.S. is a Jihadi terrorist.

U.S. suffers from shootings all the time, especially due to gang violence. One Moslem girl one year shooting out of "anger" as you say, does not equal a Jihadi terrorist.

Originally Posted by Khalil

That isn't a Jihadist. As the Rand report, shows how you cannot say that any attack from a Moslem in U.S. is a Jihadi terrorist.

LOL, I see now, spaying graffiti on a local McDonald's is terrorism, a muslim fanatic taking jewish women hostage and shooting them is not. Why am I not surprised?

Originally Posted by Borat

Americans in Israel and elsewhere murdered by Mideastern muslim terrorists are still Americans murdered by muslim terrorists.

That still does not refute what you tried to refute but failed. This argument is correct:

Originally Posted by Khalil

The Rand report documents and analyzes acts of terrorism in the U.S. from 9/11 to the end of 2009. Confirms there was 0, nonetheless all my previous facts still stand. http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_...RAND_OP292.pdf This report, and your links substantiate that since 9/11 only fourteen soldiers have been killed, thirteen of those during the Fort Hood Shooting - no civilians.

It also continues to substantiate my conclusion showing that Jihadism thus accounted for only 3.6% of terrorist attacks in that time period!

Originally Posted by Borat

LOL, you are the one moving the goalpost, your original lie said nothing about Americans killed on the american soil, it claimed that no american was killed by muslim terrorists after 9/11.

Obviously the links I provided have displayed the utter absurdity of your claims, Americans have been killed by muslim terror in and outside of the US.

They didn't though. All they did was show that 14 US soldiers have been killed by Moslem extremists. Any other incidents were from regular people without the "Jihadi terrorist" or extremism.

Your initial claim was that Moslem extremism is the cause of the most terrorism in US and Europe.

According to FBI's chronological order of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from 1980-2005 only 6% of them were committed by Islamic extremists.

In Europe according to the EU police, Europol, only a 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2006 to 2008 could be attributed to extremist Muslims. If you'd like to research further Europol publishes an annual report entitled EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report.

Let's say a few US citizens died from Muslims in the US since 9/11. So, what is your point? That we should get rid of all the Muslims? If that is the case let's get rid of all terrorism - that would mean all the Latinos who caused 42% terrorism in the US since 1985-2005.

Originally Posted by Borat

LOL, I see now, spaying graffiti on a local McDonald's is terrorism, a muslim fanatic taking jewish women hostage and shooting them is not. Why am I not surprised?

Like I said, it depends upon how you view terrorism. Your view of terrorism is that Semites are unconditionally evil.

Originally Posted by Borat

LOL, I see now, spaying graffiti on a local McDonald's is terrorism, a muslim fanatic taking jewish women hostage and shooting them is not. Why am I not surprised?

Again, over half of the incidents in the CIA report were bombings. Only one of them was something so stupid.

There are over 100,000 domestic terrorists in the US according to the FBI. Worry about them.

The term terrorism means an activity that (according to U.S. government):
(i) involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, property or infrastructure; and
(ii) appears to be intended
(A) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(B) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(C) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, kidnapping or hostage taking.

Couldn't this render much of US foreign policy as terrorism?

Originally Posted by The Judge

Your argument seems to be based on the principle that the hated Semites are unconditionally evil no matter what they do.

Again, I hate to rain on your moronic parade, but anti-Semitism doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with people whose ancestors were Semitic people, as the term was coined by a social anthropologist studying the perpetual persecution and discrimination perpetrated against the Jewish people since time immemorial. Hence, it doesn't pertain to whether or not a person is a Semite or not, as anti-Semites like you can and do consist of all races and ethnicities. I mean even you are a testament to that fact, as you are an extremely obsessed and unhinged Jew hating anti-Semitic bigot.

Not to mention as well that Muslims consist of all races and ethnicities, and Muslims all have one thing in common. Indeed, they are all rabid enemies of Jews and also of all other non-Muslim unbelievers as well, per the dictates of Islam.

Are you claiming that Iranians are Semites too? How about Pakistani Muslims, are they Semites too? How American converts to Islam, are they Semites too? How about Indian Muslims, are they Semites too? Indeed, they all hate Jews and other non-Muslim infidels with a passion per the dictates of Islam. Yet they are not Semites? What gives?

Indeed, why don't you stop embarrassing yourself like a fool and just accept the fact that you are a gullible anti-Semitic bigot?

You don't recognize and accept the nation of Palestine, so there is no point in hating the Semites/Persians because of one's own faults.

The existence of so-called Palestinian people is taqiyya. It's a sham created as a pretext to justify the aggressive jihad of conquest being waged perpetually against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel by the Islamic world.

Not to mention that Persian Muslims aren't of Semitic stock, irrefutably proving that being a Semite doesn't have anything to do with anything. However, being a Muslim obligated to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme has everything to do with why Muslims are waging a perpetual jihad of conquest against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel, and indeed against all non-Muslim unbelievers in the world.

Israel is the only one who is expanding illegal settlements to destroy the nation of Palestine. One can't blame the hated Semites/Persians for that.

The settlements are not illegal. You have had your ignorance's, and there are a lot of them, exploited to the hilt. In fact, you couldn't be any more oblivious and mentally incompetent where Islam and Israel are concerned.

Originally Posted by ObamaYoMoma

Again, I hate to rain on your moronic parade, but anti-Semitism doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with people whose ancestors were Semitic people, as the term was coined by a social anthropologist studying the perpetual persecution and discrimination perpetrated against the Jewish people since time immemorial. Hence, it doesn't pertain to whether or not a person is a Semite or not, as anti-Semites like you can and do consist of all races and ethnicities. I mean even you are a testament to that fact, as you are an extremely obsessed and unhinged Jew hating anti-Semitic bigot.

Irrelevant. It is wrong to hate Semites regardless if they are Jews or Arabs.

as you are an extremely obsessed and unhinged Jew hating anti-Semitic bigot.

Ah, ad hominems... that's so Israel (slang for insulting)! I might be a Jew or an Arab, so your personal attack is probably anti-Semite regardless from which direction it is looked at.

Not to mention as well that Muslims consist of all races and ethnicities, and Muslims all have one thing in common. Indeed, they are all rabid enemies of Jews and also of all other non-Muslim unbelievers as well, per the dictates of Islam.

The only race is the human race. It's thus the hatred of human groups which makes racism relevant.

Are you claiming that Iranians are Semites too? How about Pakistani Muslims, are they Semites too? How American converts to Islam, are they Semites too? How about Indian Muslims, are they Semites too? Indeed, they all hate Jews and other non-Muslim infidels with a passion per the dictates of Islam. Yet they are not Semites? What gives?

Iranians are generally Persians, but they seem to be hated too.

Indeed, why don't you stop embarrassing yourself like a fool and just accept the fact that you are a gullible anti-Semitic bigot?

Ah, more ad hominems... that's so Israel (slang for insulting)! Is it not possible to represent Israel without insulting it?

The existence of so-called Palestinian people is taqiyya. It's a sham created as a pretext to justify the aggressive jihad of conquest being waged perpetually against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel by the Islamic world.

Palestinians have the same right to exist as Israelis.

However, being a Muslim obligated to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme has everything to do with why Muslims are waging a perpetual jihad of conquest against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel, and indeed against all non-Muslim unbelievers in the world.

Prove that the hated Semites are as evil as Israel insists that you believe.

The settlements are not illegal. You have had your ignorance's, and there are a lot of them, exploited to the hilt. In fact, you couldn't be any more oblivious and mentally incompetent where Islam and Israel are concerned.

Defending illegal settlements does not justify the hatred of Semites.

Originally Posted by ObamaYoMoma

Again, I hate to rain on your moronic parade, but anti-Semitism doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with people whose ancestors were Semitic people, as the term was coined by a social anthropologist studying the perpetual persecution and discrimination perpetrated against the Jewish people since time immemorial. Hence, it doesn't pertain to whether or not a person is a Semite or not, as anti-Semites like you can and do consist of all races and ethnicities. I mean even you are a testament to that fact, as you are an extremely obsessed and unhinged Jew hating anti-Semitic bigot.

Not to mention as well that Muslims consist of all races and ethnicities, and Muslims all have one thing in common. Indeed, they are all rabid enemies of Jews and also of all other non-Muslim unbelievers as well, per the dictates of Islam.

only a punk could post that and actually believe it.

Are you claiming that Iranians are Semites too? How about Pakistani Muslims, are they Semites too? How American converts to Islam, are they Semites too? How about Indian Muslims, are they Semites too? Indeed, they all hate Jews and other non-Muslim infidels with a passion per the dictates of Islam. Yet they are not Semites? What gives?

psychotic

Indeed, why don't you stop embarrassing yourself like a fool and just accept the fact that you are a gullible anti-Semitic bigot?

i dont really care what you are, and i can see why people hate you!

The existence of so-called Palestinian people is taqiyya. It's a sham created as a pretext to justify the aggressive jihad of conquest being waged perpetually against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel by the Islamic world.

wow.... israel did not exist and palestine is the lands you know they took and you talk taqiyya....?

Not to mention that Persian Muslims aren't of Semitic stock, irrefutably proving that being a Semite doesn't have anything to do with anything. However, being a Muslim obligated to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme has everything to do with why Muslims are waging a perpetual jihad of conquest against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel, and indeed against all non-Muslim unbelievers in the world.

semitic is a language

and the people that are pissed at the occupiers in israel is because they uprooted a few million people and took their lands by force. Is that tough for you to admit?

The settlements are not illegal. You have had your ignorance's, and there are a lot of them, exploited to the hilt. In fact, you couldn't be any more oblivious and mentally incompetent where Islam and Israel are concerned.

no wonder this site is delisted from google.

this is the kind of poster that makes it a stormfront