
Originally Posted by
Khalil
Actually you're both wrong. Israel was recognized as a state in 1949, through resolution 273, on its second application to the UN. Israel was in fact the only state to have achieved statehood through an act of the UN. As I mentioned it was Israel's second application, the first one was rejected namely because Israel's noncompliance with UN resolutions. During the debate for Israel's admission the Israeli representative gave assurances that Israel would observe the principles of the UN Charter, implment its resolutions, with importance of resolutions 181, and 194. Evidently, being here about some 60 years later, we know that Israel did not comply with any of those promises that was conditioned for joining the UN system - the resolution admitting Israel into the UN made specific reference to these assurances "the declaration of the State of Israel that it unreservedly accepts the obligations of the United Nations Charter" and "recalling its resolutions of 29 November 1947, and 11 December 1948 and taking note of the declarations and explanations made by the representative of the Government of Israel before the ad hoc Political Committee in respect of the implementation of the said resolutions"
Correct, and so it's perfectly legitimate not to recognize a synthetic State which has not complied with the terms of its manufacture.
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, .. Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, ..Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.
Omar Khayyam
Zionism is criminal by default.
Bookmarks