Thread: MI6 confirm Iranian nuke program, claim success in preventing Iranian nukes in 2008

Originally Posted by AestheticBrah

Borat, he believe the British when it suits him, denounces them when it doesn't, is there ever any substance to a Borat thread I wonder?

Anyway, the CIA and MOSSAD themselves say Iran is NOT developing a nuke. MI6 say they are, who do you believe, evidently, Borat has believed whoever suits his cause.

More propaganda to set the stage for an increase in the tension between the west and Iran. Saber rattling, war mongering nonsense.

Yes, of course it is, and it's not even a different narrative really, it's pretty much the same rehashed BS, that was thrust at us, on the lead up to Iraq.

Once again we have vague stories in the press about cops arresting 'terror suspects', who, once again, will turn out to be some blokes with nothing to answer to.

Substance and truth do not matter though - implication manufactures 'consent'.

Iran have consistantly said that they do not have nukes, they do not desire to build or buy them, and yet, look how the slaves are programmed...do not believe anyone...that is not your slave master.

And so, the offical line of Iran is what...dismissed, in favour of the TRUE conspiracy 'theory', that Iran are going to build nuke weapon programme, and, on day one, 'wipe the wickle Jewish state off the map'.

How telling is that, that time and again, there are those PUSHING the US and Britian into wars, with LESS evidence than we present for the infilatration of Jewish extremists in our system, or MUCH less evidence (eg NONE), than we may suggest for Mossad being involved in 911.

And they think they are 'In the know', and we are 'conspiracy theorists'. Yeah, right.

Jack.

Originally Posted by AestheticBrah

Bush LIED because Iraq had no WMDs when the USA invaded, that's why they were NEVER found. So your tiny brain made an error there.

Secondly, did you see all the nonsense that Colin Powell said about Iraq to the UN?

Did you see Donald Rumsfeld saying Osama was hiding in a state of the art mountain fortress, of which there wasn't just one, but MANY of them...

Did you see George Bush saying Iraq was implicated in 9/11 and Al-Qaeda...?

Then did you see George Bush say that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11?

Then did you see the one where Bush denies EVER linking Iraq with 9/11 or Al-Qaeda...?

Listen, mate, It's ALL lies.

Can you not see that these people NEED the public behind them before they decide to go to war, can you not understand that they will LIE to you, misquote people, fabricate intelligence reports, broadcast false media, in order to BRAINWASH you into supporting their already decided action?

How can people be this stupid and blind? It's mind boggling just how far down the road we are and the asylum inmates STILL cannot see they are fenced off.

Exactly.

Expect this to be an optimum time for more shillery, and media skullduggery.

After all, it is their most fav month.

We already know that the British and the USers are liars about almost everything concerning the Middle East.

They are insane with the lust for war. They have been fighting wars non-stop for over 100 years now.

Haven't we had enough Armageddons large and small already in the last 112 years from these geniuses of death, destruction and lies?

Originally Posted by Jack Napier

Exactly.

Expect this to be an optimum time for more shillery, and media skullduggery.

After all, it is their most fav month.

Exactly. It's just one huge cesspit of lies, propaganda, spin and more lies.

How can people be so blind. They REFUSE to believe or even consider a position, from which FACTS are presented. But they wholly believe and SUPPORT a position from which absolutely no evidence supports. In fact it's not that these sheep believe something without any evidence, they believe and support a position from which there is NO evidence, coming from PROVEN LIARS

Jack, have you seen this?



It pretty much just shows you the double sided agenda. These SLAVES are under occupation from a foreign master, and no matter how many times you tell them, they will continue to make excuses for their masters.

Originally Posted by AestheticBrah

Exactly. It's just one huge cesspit of lies, propaganda, spin and more lies.

How can people be so blind. They REFUSE to believe or even consider a position, from which FACTS are presented. But they wholly believe and SUPPORT a position from which absolutely no evidence supports. In fact it's not that these sheep believe something without any evidence, they believe and support a position from which there is NO evidence, coming from PROVEN LIARS

Jack, have you seen this?



It pretty much just shows you the double sided agenda. These SLAVES are under occupation from a foreign master, and no matter how many times you tell them, they will continue to make excuses for their masters.

Good on Matt, a true and old fashioned journalist.

But wait..

Does this now make Matt an anti semite, as well?

Can Matt look forward to the same filthy treatment of John Pilger, to name but one, who, in a society which is meant to have free press, would have to go through about 50 electric fences, to get an article published that dared criticise these facking Jewish criminals in Israel, and do you know why?

I will tell you why.

Because, the Jewish thugs here, they do what Jewish thugs on forums do, only worse.

His mailbox is then full of death threats, hate, the most disgusting examples of the most evil of minds.

His editor is bullied, by e mail showers, by organised Jewry.

These things are facts, our free press IS attacked by organised Jewry in this country, and I for one, am fecking sick of our free press and British journalists not being able to write as they should, for fear of reprisals by these Jewish thugs.

Oh how people's voices shake, as the can no longer deny what and who these people are.

How they will up their usual Hasbara, in order to cover up the fact, that about the ONLY thing in the World, that no journalist can write about, without a reaction like that of the Browshirts, are Jews, Israel, or Zionism.

But it is a FACT.

Just to let you know also, that I have decided to put all those that use the proven slander of calling another 'anti semite', on ignore.

They add nothing to anything, and are ONLY out to smear, slander, and derail.

We all know by now that it's use is an admitted trick, as per usual with those that will use anything, and we know it, because Jews themselves have admitted it, Zionist and anti Zionist Jews, by the way.

It would not matter what you showed, or spent time looking for, or named, or anything, all you would get for your efforts would be that BS, so, up to everyone of course, but I am just not entertaining that anymore, if someone wishes to show that content is wrong and why, fine, do that, but the moment they use this, from this moment on, I am no longer going to engage in discourse with them, of any kind, on any thread, answer any of their questions, ever, they keep using that, they go on ignore.

No time for it anymore, it's one on going ad hom, and I am not accepting it, so they go on ignore.

Originally Posted by AestheticBrah

It pretty much just shows you the double sided agenda. These SLAVES are under occupation from a foreign master, and no matter how many times you tell them, they will continue to make excuses for their masters.

At least she admitted to being "inconsistent".

Being re-lie-able means being able to tell the lie over and over again consistently.

Originally Posted by AestheticBrah

Bush LIED because Iraq had no WMDs when the USA invaded, that's why they were NEVER found. So your tiny brain made an error there.

Secondly, did you see all the nonsense that Colin Powell said about Iraq to the UN?

Did you see Donald Rumsfeld saying Osama was hiding in a state of the art mountain fortress, of which there wasn't just one, but MANY of them...

Did you see George Bush saying Iraq was implicated in 9/11 and Al-Qaeda...?

Then did you see George Bush say that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11?

Then did you see the one where Bush denies EVER linking Iraq with 9/11 or Al-Qaeda...?

Listen, mate, It's ALL lies.

Can you not see that these people NEED the public behind them before they decide to go to war, can you not understand that they will LIE to you, misquote people, fabricate intelligence reports, broadcast false media, in order to BRAINWASH you into supporting their already decided action?

How can people be this stupid and blind? It's mind boggling just how far down the road we are and the asylum inmates STILL cannot see they are fenced off.

LOL, is it the best you can do? What does Bush have to do with all this? You brought up a totally irrelevant Iraq WMD situation trying to introduce a "they erred before so everything they do and did and will ever do must be also wrong" logical fallacy. In addition you admitted that Saddam did have and use WMDs, it was not a fabrication. Your case has completely collapsed and your screaming about Bush is a lame diversion at best, certainly not a relevant or serious argument about the Iranian nuke program.

That said we both know Iran wants nukes, for the life of me I won't believe that there is a single person on the planet thinking that Iran is after a nuclear power station and not the most formidable most powerful offensive and defensive weapon on the planet. That's silly and naive. The difference between me and you, between the civilized part of humanity and your ilk is that we don't want Iran to have nukes and you do, all this rhetoric of yours is not fooling anyone, you want them to get nukes so you are covering for them.

Originally Posted by Ivan88

We already know that the British and the USers are liars about almost everything concerning the Middle East.

They are insane with the lust for war. They have been fighting wars non-stop for over 100 years now.

Haven't we had enough Armageddons large and small already in the last 112 years from these geniuses of death, destruction and lies?

We should no longer give them the honour of being called 'British' or 'American'.

Originally Posted by Borat

LOL, is it the best you can do? What does Bush have to do with all this? You brought up a totally irrelevant Iraq WMD situation trying to introduce a "they erred before so everything they do and did and will ever do must be also wrong" logical fallacy. In addition you admitted that Saddam did have and use WMDs, it was not a fabrication. Your case has completely collapsed and your screaming about Bush is a lame diversion at best, certainly not a relevant or serious argument about the Iranian nuke program.

That said we both know Iran wants nukes, for the life of me I won't believe that there is a single person on the planet thinking that Iran is after a nuclear power station and not the most formidable most powerful offensive and defensive weapon on the planet. That's silly and naive. The difference between me and you, between the civilized part of humanity and your ilk is that we don't want Iran to have nukes and you do, all this rhetoric of yours is not fooling anyone, you want them to get nukes so you are covering for them.

Heavens above...

Have they eaten your brain such that you cannot see the wall of propaganda SURROUNDING you?

Drop the fallacy mate, there are videos from 2001 where Condi Rice and Colin Powell state CLEARLY that they know Iraq no longer has any weapons of mass destruction. They unequivocally state that Iraq no longer poses a threat to ANYONE, not even it's neighbors.



How do you respond to that? huh?

Fast forward after 9/11, they start harping on about WMD and Iraq, and Iraq's links to Al-Qaeda...when just months earlier they stated Iraq posed no threat to anyone.

You've been had, okay? you've been LIED to by PROVEN LIARS, we get it, you're angry you got brainwashed, but that's not my fault. Don't take it out on me buddy.

you simply do not want to accept the fact you've been bred for slaughter. Now the same lot are harping on about Iran, you MUST automatically believe they are LYING, afterall they did it once to great effect, they'd probably try doing it again, Borat, they are LYING, don't you get it?

Originally Posted by AestheticBrah

Drop the fallacy mate

LOL, why would I do that? Your attempts to "prove" that Iran does not develop nukes because Saddam's WMDs were not found is the mother of all fallacies. And besides you yourself admitted that Saddam did have and use WMDs. You need a better argument than that, ideally one having at least something to do with Iran