Thread: Reuters (Rothschilds) claim their news service hacked after exposed to printing lies

Originally Posted by Jonsa

The whole rothschild conspiracy theory is a staple of stormfront, nationa vangard, revisionsits, deniers, and other assorted jew haters. Of course they have no evidence, it would just get inthe way of a good hate-on.

It is true the first baron rothschild financed the napoleonic wars and made a bundle. It is also true that the rothschild's central fortune was completely obliterated in WW2 by you know who.
Today their private banking network could best be described as a well respected tier three player (in terms of assets under management). The remaining family is mostly involved in jewish philanthropy.

bummer eh, mario.

I wonder what's it like to build an entire world view on a bunch of hate motivated lies and outrageous conspiracy theories? Oh, never mind, I realize you can't possibly be aware, or you wouldn't repeatedly look so foolish.

Jewish philanthropy? LMAO. Like what?

Originally Posted by Stuart Wolfe

Make no mistake, Reuters can't be trusted, but not because they're a bunch of Zionists. They're just incompetent.

Seriously dude you can't be that dumbo can ya? You cannot see that when liars get busted they play the idiot? Now you are saying that Rothschilds aka Reuters are just dumb (the game they play when they get busted) Go back to the OP and re read it, Reuters were busted reporting big fat whopping lies and when they got busted they played dumbo, "ooohhh gee we got hacked we were too focking stupid to have internet security on our servers", yeh sure they did! and you really believe that nonsense?

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

Seriously dude you can't be that dumbo can ya?

Nah, my ears aren't as big and I can't fly.

You cannot see that when liars get busted they play the idiot?

If I thought they were intelligent enough, I would agree with you. But I really do think they are that dumb. I wouldn't put the Reuters editorial staff in charge of a high school newspaper.

Now you are saying that Rothschilds aka Reuters

Again, if the Rothschilds really ran Reuters, why would they allow those faked photos to be used during Reutersgate, damaging their own cause until a blogger called them out? It only makes sense under two conditions: They either don't control Reuters ... or Reuters is really that dumb.

Originally Posted by Stuart Wolfe

Again, if the Rothschilds really ran Reuters, why would they allow those faked photos to be used during Reutersgate, damaging their own cause until a blogger called them out? It only makes sense under two conditions: They either don't control Reuters ... or Reuters is really that dumb.

Seriously dude I have given you this information already three times on this site, what the hell is it gunna take for it to sink in? (obviously you (JIDF) just want this info to disappear that is why I am going to re-post it just to peeve you off)

"To better understand this on-going tyranny of capital we also need to know how, from near-absolute power over the people’s finances, the House of Rothschild and others moved on to control, and enclose, our media and information supply. As Kent Cooper, a former head of Associated Press, noted "international bankers under the House of Rothschild acquired an interest in the three leading European [news] agencies." The Rothschild group purchased Reuters in London, Havas in France, and Wolf in Germany to monopolize the news creation nexus and information-dissemination business in Europe and around the world. Today's global corporate media empire is simply an extension of this trend to control information and assure capital's propaganda remains both dominant and ubiquitous."

Just stick Bush, Colin Powell, and many others like them in this picture to see who the real conspiracy nutters are.

Regarding Rothschild influence in news media:

Big Corporations and little ones, mostly have interconnected directors, major share owners, and proxy counters who all belong to the same club.

Just because you can buy a share of their company and vote against them means nothing.

Even if there were a majority of shareholders voting against management, their proxies all include a little phrase that gives management the right to vote their shares on issues that come up outside the printed agenda.

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

Seriously dude I have given you this information already three times on this site, what the hell is it gunna take for it to sink in? (obviously you (JIDF) just want this info to disappear that is why I am going to re-post it just to peeve you off)

Well, it isn't working because I'm nowhere near peeved off. On the other hand, your accusing me of disagreeing with you as being part of the JIDF (and I had to look up what that was) is a bit instructive. Anyone who disagrees with you is part of a conspiracy? I'm actually the opposite of peeved, I'm rather amused at this. I give it another couple posts before you accuse me of being Mossad.

"To better understand this on-going tyranny of capital we also need to know how, from near-absolute power over the people’s finances, the House of Rothschild and others moved on to control, and enclose, our media and information supply. As Kent Cooper, a former head of Associated Press, noted "international bankers under the House of Rothschild acquired an interest in the three leading European [news] agencies." The Rothschild group purchased Reuters in London, Havas in France, and Wolf in Germany to monopolize the news creation nexus and information-dissemination business in Europe and around the world. Today's global corporate media empire is simply an extension of this trend to control information and assure capital's propaganda remains both dominant and ubiquitous."

Yeah, I got that. Now explain why Reuters was working against their owners Zionist interests during Reutersgate. Bonus points if you include the Illuminati in your answer.

Originally Posted by Stuart Wolfe

Well, it isn't working because I'm nowhere near peeved off. On the other hand, your accusing me of disagreeing with you as being part of the JIDF (and I had to look up what that was) is a bit instructive. Anyone who disagrees with you is part of a conspiracy? I'm actually the opposite of peeved, I'm rather amused at this. I give it another couple posts before you accuse me of being Mossad.



Yeah, I got that. Now explain why Reuters was working against their owners Zionist interests during Reutersgate. Bonus points if you include the Illuminati in your answer.

Yeh sure dude the Rothschild's are working against their own interests. Here is a question, the Rothschild's owned the US Federal Reserve from 1913 and soon after that date is when world wars started...is that a coincidence?

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

Seriously dude

Seriously dude care to provide documentation for Rothschild majority control of Reuters, Havas, or Wolf? If not then (*)(*)(*)(*) and (*)(*)(*)(*)! You won't because you can't for one reason I know for a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing fact that Thomson Corp acquired Reuters very recently. What you posted is not evidence save for your wonderful copy/paste ability from bull(*)(*)(*)(*) unreferenced articles which you read recently on Stormfront which quotes some guy whose been dead since 1965.

aren't they the photoshop "enhancement" people ??

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

Yeh sure dude the Rothschild's are working against their own interests.

It's the only way to explain Reuters behavior if you assume the Rothschilds control it. Do you begin to see the problems with assuming some kind of huge Zionistic Conspiracy? Eventually common sense creeps in and makes the assumptions look a bit foolish.

Here is a question, the Rothschild's owned the US Federal Reserve from 1913 and soon after that date is when world wars started...is that a coincidence?

...are you serious? Do you have any IDEA how many factors came into play starting WWI and II?