Thread: Gods 'chosen people' now attacking African diplomats

Originally Posted by Gilos

Germany is committed to Israel existence, its Israel best friend in Europe, if there is away to correct the past - that would be the way, Liebe has many reasons to be proud of her country and of her values as a person.

Yes I am a proud German. I fully support Merkel although I typically vote SPD. In any event it is usually either SPD or CDU/CSU that get voted in by the Germans (right wing and extreme left wing parties are marginal). Right now everyone is behind Merkel. She is very popular and since she was voted in, we can assume she represents us even if Englishmen claim that she does not.

Germany is also sometimes critical of Israeli actions but likewise of terrorism against israel. That to me is just. It is also my position.

Originally Posted by Jack Napier

Listen.

Jews have been central to immigration into Europe and the US.

Why did they do that? So that they could weaken us, and turn one on the other, to act as a further smokescreen for their crimes.

Take this 'Jew'.

Why doesn't she fark off to Gayville, and take her concepts with her...

Relax.
I agree with you.
That's the whole point of my post.

Originally Posted by Abu Sina

They are so used to saying their own ancestors name KHazar that they forget that Hamas is not pronounced KHamas and hezbullah is not pronounced KHezbullah

The past kingdom of the Khazar was Islamized and some of its elites embraced Judaism... There are by far more Khazar ancestry with Islam than with Judaism... I hope you understand now why a small Arab force out of Arabia conquered North Africa, parts of Europe and reached India, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines and Islamized the whole lot... The Jews are a few and the Muslims reached one billion.

Now as far as your pretentious post about Jews hating Africans, let me explain since you do not read Hebrew... This demonstration was against 'INFILTRATORS; from the Sinai most from the Sudan and other parts of Africa, and they are approx. 50-000 souls, they have taken sections of Tel Aviv and created an eyesore... They are slowly being repatriated.

We are not against Africans as a matter of fact our best relations is with African Countries how else would you explain 50,000 people infiltrating a Democracy... at the beginning we accepted them as refugees... 50,000 in a small country is too much.

Originally Posted by Mandrake

I was wondering when this would turn into a "Jews did 911" kook thread.

I think you will find, Madrake, that the gentleman is FAR, and I mean by MILES, more respected and better educated than you.

Not to mention better placed to speak, than probably any of us.

While world bashes Israel, Arab princes try to evict Africans


Friday, August 17, 2012 | Ryan Jones


More Sharing ServicesShare|Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on print

When the Jerusalem municipality signs an eviction notice against local Arabs who construct homes without the proper permits, world governments and the international press typically work themselves into a frenzy.

But when oil-rich Arab princes try to push an entire people off their land, no one seems to notice.

That's precisely what appears to be happening now in Tanzania, where activist groups say the government is preparing to sign a deal with an Arab-owned safari company that would result in the eviction of some 48,000 members of the Maasai tribe from their ancestral lands in the Serengeti.

Ortello Business Corporation, which has close ties to Dubai's royal family, reportedly intends to create a large hunting zone where Arab kings, princes and other celebrities can hunt prized big game such as leopards and lions.

But in order for that to happen, the semi-nomadic Maasai have to be pushed out of the area, and not for the first time. In 2009, some 2,000 Maasai were evicted from another part of the Serengeti to make room for Ortello clients.

"For us, our land is everything, but these Arab princes have no respect for the animals or our rights. Many of us would rather die than be forced to move again," Mzee Orosikos, a Maasai elder, told Britain's Guardian newspaper.

The Tanzanian government denied the allegations, but activist leaders said the officials are just trying to cover their tracks.

An online petitioned addressed to Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete has been started on the social action website Avaaz.org, and at press time already has over 750,000 signatures.

So why is this story receiving so little press coverage and being paid no attention at all by Western governments or the UN (the very same forces that are so unsettled when a single Arab family that conducted illegal construction in Jerusalem is evicted)?

A couple of speculative reasons are that in the case of Tanzania's Maasai:
1.The perpetrators are not Jews;
2.The victims are Africans.

No link?

Did it come from Israel Today magazine..

Israel HaYom


At the time of its launch, the newspaper, owned by Sheldon Adelson, competed directly with Israeli, another free daily previously co-run by Adelson, which later became defunct

While in the Prime Minister's office, Ehud Olmert criticized Adelson's leaning towards Benjamin Netanyahu.

Ben-Dror Yemini has described the paper as "a danger to democracy.

The paper chooses to play down events that don't help to promote a positive image for Netanyahu, while on the other hand, touting and inflating events that help promote Netanyahu and the Likud.

Oren Frisco reached the same conclusion after the 2009 Knesset elections, writing that throughout the campaign, Yisrael HaYom published only one article critical of the Likud, and tens of articles critical of Kadima.

Zionist Pravda.