Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Latest World News


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2010, 07:48 AM
moon's Avatar
moon moon is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cyberia
Posts: 7,225
moon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 20,083
Default

Quote:
NATO to begin heavy operation in Afghanistan

The southern part of Afghanistan is about to receive a massive blow from the heavily-armed thousands of North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces (NATO) and Afghan National Army within few hours. It would possibly be the largest blow against the Taliban and hidden Al-Qaeda militants in this mountainous country since 2001.


http://www.groundreport.com/Business...stan_1/2917180
This will be the Marines' opportunity for ' revenge '. The atrocities committed in Fallujah have still not been thoroughly investigated.
__________________
668.....the neighbour of the beast
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #152 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2010, 10:19 AM
IgnoranceisBliss's Avatar
IgnoranceisBliss IgnoranceisBliss is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: U.S.A
Age: 22
Posts: 875
IgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond reputeIgnoranceisBliss has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 5,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
This will be the Marines' opportunity for ' revenge '. The atrocities committed in Fallujah have still not been thoroughly investigated.
What you mean is that the made up claims of atrocities in Fallujah have not been substantiated 6 years after the fact.
__________________
"Democracy's the worst form of government except for all the others." - Winston Churchill

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell(misquote)

Last edited by IgnoranceisBliss; 02-07-2010 at 10:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #153 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2010, 11:37 AM
-FiX- -FiX- is offline
Banned
Analyst
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,883
netherlands
-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute-FiX- has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 10,727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
I find it humorous that some deny the conclusions reached by all of the US intellegence agencies and presented in the National Intellegence Estimate simply because it doesn't fit in with their unsupported personal beliefs and opinions.
Because some of it aint true and other parts are outdated.

I find it humorous people using old intelligence to support their own unsupported beliefs.
Quote:
Al Qaeda in Iraq was an independent "al Qaeda" organization formed by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and not by Osama bin Ladin. It was called Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad and as close as it ever came to being affiliated the Osama bin Ladin's organization was when al-Zarqawi swore allegence to Osama bin Ladin' al Qaeda network in 2004. Overwhelmingly the members of the Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad were Saudi Arabians virtually none of which had ever even been to Afghanistan. While the US State Department does believe that Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad did have logistical channels through Iran there have been no claims that the Iranian government ever directly supported Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad.
I can think for myself and Al Qaida is Al Qaida.There are numerous claims made by Tony Blair just last week that Iran is supporting terror groups.
Quote:
BTW it was never believed that AQI ever had more than 1000 members and that it was only responsible for fewer than 1000 attacks in Iraq.
btw that is only believed by the ignorent people or ''truthers''.
Quote:
It is the responsibility of the government of every sovereign state to provide security within it's own borders.
I agree.
Quote:
Presenting the facts, as documented by US intellegence sources is not about being politically correct. It is about telling the truth which many choose to deny.
Telling the truth can be spreading hate. Say that the Koran is an evil book that teaches hate and you are acuuse of spreading hate when telling the truth.
Quote:
The fact is that NATO and the US forces in Afghanistan are not fighting terrorists or terrorism. Al Qaeda has predominately left Afghanistan and is now in Pakistan which is addressing it as a sovereign nation. Of note there are a few US Special Forces advisors working with the Pakistan Army in addressing al Qaeda in Pakistan.
Fact is that right now a huge operation is going on in Afghanistan against the Taliban and Al Qaida.
Quote:
The US military and NATO are waging a war against Afghanistan citizens and residents. The resistance is predominately but not exclusively members of the Afghanistan (not Pakistan) Taliban and not terrorists. The Taliban has never supported terrorism and, in fact, the Taliban leadership recently directed that no terrorist attacks be directed against the Afghanistan People. Yes, some terrorist attacks have been committed but they were in defiance of the Taliban leadership. The Taliban has been limiting itself to attacks on NATO and US forces and the Kabul regimes military and security forces. These are ligitimate military targets for a militia fighting against the invasion and occupation of their nation.
I think that is just spreading hate against America and NATO.

Keep believing our enemies the Taliban and their anti Western propoganda.They cannot fool me.
Quote:
The bottom line is that NATO and the US military in Afghanistan is not fighting terrorists but instead attempting to impose a government of it's creation upon the Afghanistan People. That is a fact.
No, fact is that if the Taliban didnt allied themself with Al Qaida and Bin Laden we wouldnt have attacked them.

Your facts are based on wrong and outdated information and are mostly propoganda from our enemies.
Reply With Quote
  #154 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 06:57 AM
SolidSamir SolidSamir is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 896
SolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 2,112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
This is a borderline call for genocide of a segment of the population based upon the religious beliefs of the individuals. The Taliban is not what anyone would call a religious sect which supports the Rights of the individual but you cannot exterminate a People based upon their religious beliefs. It would be akin to supporting the Holocaust.
that is if you choose to see the Taliban as a civilian population and not as a militia

when I say "destroy the taliban", I am referring to the destruction of its central power structure

and the haqqani network that runs it, ( i believe that is the name given to the ISI arm that helps the talibs)

the talibs are not the majority, but they enforce their will over the majority with weapons

weapons that were left over from the soviet conflict

these talibs would never have been in power had the US not funded their growth

the fact that they had money during the soviet age attracted many young men to join them, simply because that was the only future left

they must cease to exist as a violent political entity because an alternative has been created (the somewhat democratic government of kharzai)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
In their resistance to the US invasion and occupation of their country it isn't even a matter of religion but instead a matter of patriotism. All people have a right to oppose a foreign military force of occupation. The mujahideen had the Right to fight against the foreign occupation of their country by the USSR and they have a Right to fight against the US/NATO occupation of their country as well. There is fundamentally no difference between the two situations.
I would agree with you if the Taliban were solely afghan patriots

but they arent

they are foreigners from all corners of the muslim world, and their view of sharia is something they want to impose on the afghan people

and while this in itself is no reason to destroy them as a political group, it is their means of attaining these goals that are flawed

not any more flawed then the US, but the US at least does not want to completely govern the affairs of afghan people forever
__________________
Quote:
"Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories."
-- Benyamin Netanyahu, , speaking to students at Bar Ilan University, from the Israeli journal Hotam, November 24, 1989.

Last edited by SolidSamir; 02-09-2010 at 06:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #155 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 07:50 AM
dhdqh's Avatar
dhdqh dhdqh is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: north dakota
Posts: 151
usa us north dakota
dhdqh is a splendid one to beholddhdqh is a splendid one to beholddhdqh is a splendid one to beholddhdqh is a splendid one to beholddhdqh is a splendid one to beholddhdqh is a splendid one to beholddhdqh is a splendid one to beholddhdqh is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 809
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidSamir View Post
that is if you choose to see the Taliban as a civilian population and not as a militia

when I say "destroy the taliban", I am referring to the destruction of its central power structure

and the haqqani network that runs it, ( i believe that is the name given to the ISI arm that helps the talibs)

the talibs are not the majority, but they enforce their will over the majority with weapons

weapons that were left over from the soviet conflict

these talibs would never have been in power had the US not funded their growth

the fact that they had money during the soviet age attracted many young men to join them, simply because that was the only future left

they must cease to exist as a violent political entity because an alternative has been created (the somewhat democratic government of kharzai)



I would agree with you if the Taliban were solely afghan patriots

but they arent

they are foreigners from all corners of the muslim world, and their view of sharia is something they want to impose on the afghan people

and while this in itself is no reason to destroy them as a political group, it is their means of attaining these goals that are flawed

not any more flawed then the US, but the US at least does not want to completely govern the affairs of afghan people forever

that was a very good and concise statement...
Reply With Quote
  #156 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 08:11 AM
Shiva_TD's Avatar
Shiva_TD Shiva_TD is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Everett WA
Posts: 12,134
usa us washington
Shiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 749,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidSamir View Post
that is if you choose to see the Taliban as a civilian population and not as a militia

when I say "destroy the taliban", I am referring to the destruction of its central power structure

and the haqqani network that runs it, ( i believe that is the name given to the ISI arm that helps the talibs)

the talibs are not the majority, but they enforce their will over the majority with weapons

weapons that were left over from the soviet conflict

these talibs would never have been in power had the US not funded their growth

the fact that they had money during the soviet age attracted many young men to join them, simply because that was the only future left

they must cease to exist as a violent political entity because an alternative has been created (the somewhat democratic government of kharzai)
My previous response was related to a general statement about eliminating all of the Taliban while only a small percentage of the Taliban can actually be referred to as the "militia" of the Taliban. This would be similar to addressing members of Hamas or Hezbollah where the "militia" members are only a small component of much larger organizations.

There can be many discussions as to exactly how the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan as many also cite the fact that once the USSR left the US basically lost interest completely in Afghanistan.

My position is similar in that while I see the regime of Karzia as being corrupt and tyrannical the Taliban is worse. It is the issue of two evils IMO with the Taliban being the worse of the two evils. Of course as an American I don't believe the Unites States should be supporting any evil or tyrannical regimes, period.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidSamir View Post
I would agree with you if the Taliban were solely afghan patriots

but they arent

they are foreigners from all corners of the muslim world, and their view of sharia is something they want to impose on the afghan people

and while this in itself is no reason to destroy them as a political group, it is their means of attaining these goals that are flawed

not any more flawed then the US, but the US at least does not want to completely govern the affairs of afghan people forever
Agreed in principle but because the United States installed and is supporting the government of Karzai it must assume more than just a little responsibility for corruption and tyrannical acts of the Karzai government.

It is the US support for governments which are perceived as being tyrannical which ultimately leads to the terrorist threat against the United States.
__________________
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —
http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm
Forum Rules and Guidelines: http://www.politicalforum.com/curren...uncements.html
Reply With Quote
  #157 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 08:25 AM
The Great Khan's Avatar
The Great Khan The Great Khan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,159
uk wales
The Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond reputeThe Great Khan has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 24,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgnoranceisBliss View Post
What you mean is that the made up claims of atrocities in Fallujah have not been substantiated 6 years after the fact.
They have been substantiated by people who were there. Jo Wilding was there and has written about it, check it out and learn something.
__________________
The Right Wing hand book. How to debate on the internet.

When confronted with someone criticising American foreign policy please use the following lines.

1.You hate America..
2. You support Terrorism.
3.You are Anti-American.
4.They hate our freedoms.
5. I have been water boarded..

Please repeat ad nauseum...

Last edited by The Great Khan; 02-09-2010 at 08:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 09:28 AM
SolidSamir SolidSamir is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 896
SolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond reputeSolidSamir has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 2,112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
My previous response was related to a general statement about eliminating all of the Taliban while only a small percentage of the Taliban can actually be referred to as the "militia" of the Taliban. This would be similar to addressing members of Hamas or Hezbollah where the "militia" members are only a small component of much larger organizations.
I differ with respect to this

I feel as though the minority are the talibs who run, albeit poorly, the offices of the Afghan government

these offices are upheld by the armed wing of the taliban

nowadays the taliban are allowed to run for office in the new democratic system, and if they were truly a movement of the people then that should reflect in the elections (i.e. Hamas)

even if kharzai is a corrupt drug lord, at least he is on a leash

the taliban have no masters, and they often get their way through murder

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
There can be many discussions as to exactly how the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan as many also cite the fact that once the USSR left the US basically lost interest completely in Afghanistan.
Americas interest in afghanistan certainly started with the USSR's appearance

but that doesnt excuse the fact that the US left the afghan people to the war dogs they created

war dogs dont/cant run legitimate nations

they only breed more violence, and here we are today putting the dogs back in their cages so that civilization might once again thrive in one of the most ancient birthplaces of civilization
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
My position is similar in that while I see the regime of Karzia as being corrupt and tyrannical the Taliban is worse. It is the issue of two evils IMO with the Taliban being the worse of the two evils. Of course as an American I don't believe the Unites States should be supporting any evil or tyrannical regimes, period.
Yes, but this is a step by step process

we need to be the strong arm of the Kharzai government so the seeds of democracy can come to fruition
eventually the people will have better candidates and they will weed out the terrible ones

taliban=drugs, corruption, murder
kharzai=drugs, corruption
the future=drugs...




Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
Agreed in principle but because the United States installed and is supporting the government of Karzai it must assume more than just a little responsibility for corruption and tyrannical acts of the Karzai government.
they should, they should punish it heavily

and reward the opposite
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
It is the US support for governments which are perceived as being tyrannical which ultimately leads to the terrorist threat against the United States.
it is also the support of proxy minorities within stable self governing nations which breeds terrorism
__________________
Quote:
"Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories."
-- Benyamin Netanyahu, , speaking to students at Bar Ilan University, from the Israeli journal Hotam, November 24, 1989.

Last edited by SolidSamir; 02-09-2010 at 09:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #159 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2010, 05:01 AM
Shiva_TD's Avatar
Shiva_TD Shiva_TD is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Everett WA
Posts: 12,134
usa us washington
Shiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond reputeShiva_TD has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 749,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidSamir View Post
I differ with respect to this

I feel as though the minority are the talibs who run, albeit poorly, the offices of the Afghan government

these offices are upheld by the armed wing of the taliban

nowadays the taliban are allowed to run for office in the new democratic system, and if they were truly a movement of the people then that should reflect in the elections (i.e. Hamas)

even if kharzai is a corrupt drug lord, at least he is on a leash

the taliban have no masters, and they often get their way through murder
Yes, the Taliban is a minority but even minorities have Rights in a nation. Of note the Taliban is not the only armed resistance against the US imposed government in Afghanistan but instead they are the majority of the opposition to it.

We should also realize that merely "throwing the dog a bone" such as now allowing members of the Taliban to run for office today after Karzai is in power and has demonstrated that he controls the vote does not remove the opposition to that government. Karzai is not going to allow any Taliban members any significant role in the government of Afghanistan.

Simply stated, if residents and citizens of Afghanistan opposed the US imposed government merely allowing them to become members of that same government does not remove their reasons for opposing it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidSamir View Post
Americas interest in afghanistan certainly started with the USSR's appearance

but that doesnt excuse the fact that the US left the afghan people to the war dogs they created

war dogs dont/cant run legitimate nations

they only breed more violence, and here we are today putting the dogs back in their cages so that civilization might once again thrive in one of the most ancient birthplaces of civilization
This highlights a problem which the United States foreign policy creates. The United States should not support any group merely because they oppose our "enemies" but instead should base support on what that group stands for. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" foreign policy is the basis for the problems because it provides support to those, such as the Taliban, who are tyrannical based upon their beliefs. The US had the same problem in supporting the Contras in the 1980's because the Contras were a terrorist organization.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidSamir View Post
Yes, but this is a step by step process

we need to be the strong arm of the Kharzai government so the seeds of democracy can come to fruition
eventually the people will have better candidates and they will weed out the terrible ones

taliban=drugs, corruption, murder
kharzai=drugs, corruption
the future=drugs...

they should, they should punish it heavily

and reward the opposite

it is also the support of proxy minorities within stable self governing nations which breeds terrorism
Karzai is also engaged in the murder of those who oppose his regime so what is the real difference between the Taliban and Karzai?
__________________
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —
http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm
Forum Rules and Guidelines: http://www.politicalforum.com/curren...uncements.html

Last edited by Shiva_TD; 02-11-2010 at 02:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #160 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2010, 06:38 AM
moon's Avatar
moon moon is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cyberia
Posts: 7,225
moon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond reputemoon has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 20,083
Default

Quote:
KABUL (Reuters) - Afghan villagers should stay inside and "keep their heads down" when thousands of U.S. Marines launch a massive assault on a densely-populated district in coming days, NATO's civilian representative to Afghanistan said Tuesday.



HEADS DOWN, STAY INSIDE

"The message to the people of the area is of course, keep your heads down, stay inside when the operation is going ahead," Sedwill said.



http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6181IP20100209
Is this ' Sedwill ' for real ?
__________________
668.....the neighbour of the beast
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marines seize insurgent command center in Afghanistan MrRelevant Current Events 10 04-30-2008 10:09 AM
3,000 more Marines requested for Afghanistan gmb92 Warfare / Military 27 01-15-2008 09:14 PM
Seeking a Political Party ForceoftheTruth Political Opinions & Beliefs 41 11-28-2005 09:05 AM
Seeking Advice JavaBlack Off-Topic Chat 15 11-02-2005 09:26 AM
US is now seeking support from the UN trot Diplomacy & Conflict Resolution 9 04-17-2004 08:41 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden