I heard that the lawyer for the Obama Administration did so poorly that he was getting laughed at. At one point the lib judges were trying to help him out once they figured out he was out of his league.
If Kennedy is the swing vote he is known to decide on the side of liberty.
Will liberty win out?
Omitting the ‘doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts’ is not a morally neutral act; it is a subtle deception that calls scientific practice into disrepute.
Climate scientists face an ethical choice: do they conform to established ethical standards of scientific practice or do they sacrifice those standards in favour of actions and statements that will be more likely to shape public opinion and climate policy in their preferred direction?