Of course security is tighter now.. You've got the TSA to give granny a grope and a cavity search. Making the people who are scared to death by the terrrorists on the other side of the world and not have a single leg to stand on when they constantly go on about 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 and the next 9/11 being right around the corner unless we destabalize every country we can and sign our rights away.
They might carry terror in their hearts and scared by the terrorists. But the terrorists haven't won, even if they want to let themselves be terrorized. They want the terrorists to win. What's the goal of a "terror"ist?
Last edited by happy fun dude; Jul 25 2012 at 09:12 AM.
You already mentioned how 9/11 apparently was caused by allowing weapons onto planes. How exactly would you go about preventing them from getting there without a TSA?
I suppose you could go about it by having each airline form their own TSA equivalent, but that doesn't sound very different from the current system.
If you wanna know why granny gets groped, it's because we're not allowed to profile people, so random searches can lead to some pretty strange and absurd situations.
So, I guess the question is this. If we both recognize that there is a valid terror threat with respect to plane hijackings -- how do you best go about implementing airport security?
"Chaos... isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them.
And some are given a chance to climb, but they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.
Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is."
I like the paranoid right wingers in this thread. A+
I think you noticed an argument that's not there.. I never said the TSA was unecessary or otherwise complained about them. I only brought them up to explain the point that the lax security of the 9/11 days isn't the case any more. The next 9/11 won't require terrorists to sneak past minimum wage people reading a magazine, not supervised by the FAA, a federal agency who was told by their own people they managed to sneak guns and bombs onto planes 95% of the time and still didn't give enough crap to do something about it.
Now you gotta get past the TSA.
Last edited by happy fun dude; Jul 26 2012 at 06:53 AM.
Regarding the thread, because it's a good one.
Did you know that Obama and CNN et. al. are lying and claiming that EVERY drone death in 2012 was a militant terrorist? Perfect accuracy!
What they forgot to tell you is that ANY man between like 14 and 80 is a militant or terrorist. According to them.
If that's their definition, well I'm not surprised.
That means that most of you sitting here in your house and reading this thread, if you were demolished by a drone strike you would be a "terrorist" and you would make his accuracy rating go even higher!
It's easy to say we only kill terrorists if you just say everybody is a terrorist.
[QUOTE=happy fun dude;1061506757]Regarding the thread, because it's a good one.
five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.