Last edited by Liebe; Feb 10 2013 at 08:07 AM.
Finally the nightclub bouncer European immigrant Jew Avigdor admits the zionist truth.
They are not interested, never have been interested, and never will be interested in peace.
Wake up Obama and be a man!
Join the rest of the world now and realise your people are dying for nothing in these Israeli led wars of terror.
Every day you support this monster is another day that brings chaos and misery and revenge of the occupied and oppressed to the American people and your shores.
The zionist TERRORIST regime just gave you another slap across the face before you land in Hell Aviv !
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=563647Lieberman says no solution to Israel-Palestine conflict
JERUSALEM (Reuters) -- Israel has no chance of signing a permanent peace accord with the Palestinians and should instead seek a long-term interim deal, the most powerful political partner of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday.
The remarks by Avigdor Lieberman, an ultra-nationalist whose joint party list with Netanyahu narrowly won a Jan. 22 election while centrist challengers made surprise gains, seemed designed to dampen expectations at home and abroad of fresh peacemaking.
Last edited by Abu Sina; Feb 10 2013 at 08:33 AM.
IKHWAN AL SHAITAN
Last edited by moon; Feb 10 2013 at 08:45 AM.
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, .. Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, ..Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.
Zionism is criminal by default.
Simple as that, no fluff, anyone that can defend that FILTH, is by definition, excusing sexual abuse and mutilation.
What is the function of the male foreskin?
The male foreskin performs a number of functions. First, it directly enhances sexual pleasure via specialized erogenous nerve endings such as the frenulum, the ridged band, and stretch receptors called Meissner's corpuscles. The foreskin also serves to protect the moist, mucous membrane of the glans (the "head" of the penis) and the inner foreskin from outside elements, similar to the way the female foreskin protects the clitoris. When the foreskin is removed, the penis is transformed from an internal organ into an external one, initiating a desensitizing process known as keratinization. Keratin is a tough, skin-like substance similar to a callus that forms on top of the nerve endings of the glans, resulting in significant loss of sexual sensitivity. The foreskin also provides a gliding mechanism during sexual intercourse that reduces friction and locks in moisture, acting as a natural lubricant. The foreskin provides a number of other important functions as well.
Why would anyone cut off such a valuable body part?
Circumcision began in the United States in the late 1800's largely because some doctors thought that it prevented masturbation, which at the time was thought to be harmful. But once that and other myths were proven wrong, new reasons were created to perpetuate circumcision, most notably that a circumcised penis is more hygienic than an intact penis, that it makes boys look the same as their fathers or others in their community, and for religious reasons. Medicaid reimbursement for circumcision in thirty-two states and a lucrative market for infant foreskins also provides financial incentives for circumcision.
Does circumcision cause psychological harm?
Many men who are circumcised suffer the same psychological effects found in rape victims. A sense of great loss and feelings of anger, distrust, and grief are common among circumcised men who are aware of the functions that the foreskin performs. Problems with intimacy in adult life, long term post-traumatic stress disorder, and feelings of personal powerlessness are also reported by men when discussing their circumcisions.
Isn't it up to parents to decide what is right for their own child?
Unless there is a compelling medical reason to do so, no one has the right to cut off the working body part of a child. Genital mutilation is done for social, "hygienic", or religious reasons, and no national medical organization in the world supports forced infant circumcision as a beneficial health measure. We don't allow girls to be circumcised because we know that it is harmful to their physical and mental well being, and boys should be afforded equal protection of the law.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh how very typical. There just had to be some vile and filth financial lure as well.
Medicaid reimbursement for circumcision in thirty-two states and a lucrative market for infant foreskins also provides financial incentives for circumcision.
What happens to a baby boy’s foreskin after it’s removed in the hospital? Naturally, you might think that it is disposed of with other “medical waste,” but as I recently learned, that’s not always the case. There is, in fact, big money to be made in the foreskin business, not just the money gained from the removal, but from what becomes of the foreskin after the fact. Laura Hopper, a midwife who blogs at Alternative Birth Services recently wrote that wrinkle treatments are being made using American babies’ foreskins. Hopper quotes two articles, both detailing the use of baby foreskin in the cosmetic industry. From Acroposthion:
To summarise. We have the US, permitting ALL kinds of sexual perversions, sadism, and strange phallus based rituals, simply because the Fathers could probably never have accounted for such a contaminate to enter the society. I mean, when they said 'freedom of religion', I am pretty sure they did not conceive of that to mean killing babies with herpes, in a penis slicing ritual.
What normal people would even think of adding a caveat against that? It was alien to them, and it is alien to any human decency, no matter how anyone wants to try give it a free pass. Peter Tatchell a man who uses that sort of reasoning, giving a free pass in this case, to paedophiles, disgracefully. Curiously, America are rare in so far as the 'Christians' there, or at least a staggering %, at some point, began to be mutilated as well, and this remained the case, may even still do.
Something does not just appear in a society, by random chance, nor can it be promoted by being left idle. It takes people to bring it to life, promote it, lie to get it into the mainstream, then lie more to keep it there. In short, unlike in other Christian nations (or nations of a Christian majority), many American Christians gradually found this barbaric practice being 'offered' to them, and 'recommended', by doctors.
That is how it began there, and that is how it stuck, and that is how many Americans cams to be that way.
From the 1800s till the mid 1900s infant male circumcision in the US went from almost nothing to nearly universal.
Its seems many doctors promoting circumcision in that time had Jewish surnames as did companies that make circumcision equipment.
Other key names along the way are Dr Alan Guttmacher, an Obstretrician, who took over as Editor of Planned Parenthood Magazine in 1941 until 1983, and conducted a long campaign to persuade MOTHERS to circumcise their sons.
In the 1800's a Jewish Rabbi(will double check name), changed the original circumcision procedure from just removing the tip fo the foreskin to the whole thing.
See it as like a farmer branding his livestock.