Quote:
Originally Posted by Inferno
What terrorists were in Iraq then? What ones are there now that the recruiter Bush has sent troops there are a (*)(*)(*)(*) load. Where the (*)(*)(*)(*) is Bin Laden? Bush goes after Bin Laden who is in Afghanistan and bombs the (*)(*)(*)(*) out of Iraq. Was his aim that bad? Bin Laden was going to be brought to justice. By the time Bush left office He had almost forgotten who Bin Laden was. You believed that BS from beginning to end. Hey buy US bonds to support the troops that Runfeld Cheney and Bush sent to a usless grave. I feel so bad for those who died there I could weep. That (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) Bush and his pals are no better that the terrorists he pretended to want to kill.
|
Terrorist groups have always existed in Iraq. Read its history, it has gone thru numerous coups. Saddam used terrorist cells within Iraq to quell uprisings and kill political opponents or disenters. Were any of these terrorist a threat to America, probably not. If you are only to base the reasoning for war in Iraq on Terrorists and WMD's you would be right. It was a silly thing to do. But what you do is conviniently dismiss the other reasons we went to war there, which are the reasons I believe we are right to be there. Without WMD's and Terrorists, I would have still approved of the war in Iraq. It was the intention's of Saddam that pushed my opinion over the edge in supporting the decision to go to war. If he was another Chavez, with hollow threats, I would have paid no mind. However, Saddam had invaded 2 countries and had WMD's in the 80's and used them. So the intention was there. Allowing him to exist in the middle east was only asking for trouble in the future.
03-16-2009, 02:01 AM
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
