Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Law & Justice


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2007, 04:36 AM
summer-night
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Should certain people be excluded from jury service?

Hello. I'm currently doing a Legal Studies Assignment - it's about certain people that should be excluded from jury service, apart from those that can be exempted right now. I've a few recommendations, wonder what you all think about it? (This is based on Australia's jury system)

Married women - I would suggest that they can be excluded when requested, due to family responsibilities.

Adolescents below 21 - At the age of 18, many teenagers are still on their tertiary studies. (serving as jurors might affect their studies) Besides, at age of 21, they'll be mentally more matured.

Elderly above 60 - The elderly ones might be unfit to withstand long trials. Besides, they are already retired, they deserve real rest after retirement.

Celebrities - Imagine being recognized in the court.

Head of large companies - Serving as juror will deprive them from job for a certain time span, and this might affect companies’ decisions and achievement, which might even affect the economics directly or indirectly.

Please state your comments of my point of views, thank you.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2007, 06:31 AM
Joker's Avatar
Joker Joker is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: the process of locating.
Posts: 5,705
us new jersey
Joker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 64,978
Default ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by summer-night";p=&quot View Post
Married women - I would suggest that they can be excluded when requested, due to family responsibilities.
Married women with children who don't work and don't use daycare should be excluded.

Quote:
Adolescents below 21 - At the age of 18, many teenagers are still on their tertiary studies. (serving as jurors might affect their studies) Besides, at age of 21, they'll be mentally more matured.
College students, perhaps. The maturity argument is irrelevent. They'll be more mature at 25, so we should make 25 the age limit...But they'll be more mature at 30, so we shoulc make 30 the age limit...and so on.

Quote:
Elderly above 60 - The elderly ones might be unfit to withstand long trials. Besides, they are already retired, they deserve real rest after retirement.
Yes, anyone of retirement age should be excluded if they choose.

Quote:
Celebrities - Imagine being recognized in the court.
I don't think any lawyer would ever put a celebrity on a jury. Not only might it turn the case into a media frenzy, but celebrities decision may influence other jurors.

[quote]Head of large companies - Serving as juror will deprive them from job for a certain time span, and this might affect companies’ decisions and achievement, which might even affect the economics directly or indirectly.
Quote:

I doubt that. Most large companies have many decision-makers at the top. Besides, in todays world, a business executive would easily be able to stay in touch with the office in between hearings if necessary.


Why not include a section in your assignment on professional juries? I think it might be a good idea to do away with trial-by-peers and switch to profession full-time jurors.

Please state your comments of my point of views, thank you.
__________________
WARNING: In the unlikely event of an accidental agreement with any or all points made in the above post, contact a clinical psychologist immediately.

The views expressed in the above post are not necessarily those of Joker and/or any of his affiliates.

"You have found the secret message. Do you have too much time on your hands? ...Let it go."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2007, 05:28 AM
Ivan's Avatar
Ivan Ivan is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Age: 32
Posts: 996
ukraine us texas
Ivan will become famous soon enoughIvan will become famous soon enough
Credits: 4,024
Send a message via MSN to Ivan
Default .

I think I should also be excluded from jury duty. Have you ever had it? I had it once, and pfft. I was about to fall asleep...That's time I could've been working, (*)(*)(*)(*)it!
__________________
"Duty is the most sublime word in our language. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less." - Robert E. Lee
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden