Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Politics by Region > Middle East


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2007, 07:11 PM
concheet's Avatar
concheet concheet is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 606
usa
concheet will become famous soon enough
Credits: 7,800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashleykennedy View Post
Jewish charity to Jews. The Jerusalem Yeshiva have always had a begging bowl out. Ever since the main leaders of the Jewish faith moved out to Egypt the Jerusalem enclave has had to rely upon charity.

I am an atheist an do not think that any religion is conducive to peace. Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Hindi, Sikhism, or any other religion is for the neurotic. I have great pleasure in not being a person of the book nor do i wish to be entered into any part of it. I am one that despises all religions. All four monotheisms that have come out of the desert have been nihilistic.
Poverty as part of renouncing the world is a common theme in Jainism, Buddhism, Hinduism and Christianity. As Jesus put it in Matthew 19:21 Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
Begging as a means of allowing the religious/spiritual to live a religious/spiritual life is a time-honored tradition among many religions. No one requires anyone to give to the Buddhist monk or other monastic. It is a voluntary thing. Jews have always helped struggling Jews. That is one of the things that the religious community does. I really can't see your problem with this. Indeed, as I said, it is high time the Muslims provided the bulk of charity for their Muslim 'brothers' in Palestine.

Those desert religions didn't spawn anywhere near as many murders as have atheistic power mongers like Stalin. Hitler in truth was an atheist as well, though he pretended to religion in order to influence the religious. The Roman Emperors and others wanted nothing to do with the desert religions either. They were Gods to themselves. Not being affiliated with a religion doesn't make you one iota better or brighter than someone who is. I can assure you that religion doesn't have a monopoly on neurotics, and being an atheist doesn't mean you aren't one.

If you despise the desert religions because they are nihilistic, why is it that you seem to accept the idea of Islamic dominance over countries that support freedom of religion, such as in Israel...? Why would you be willing to enslave so many people, as the poor people of Iran are, for example, by not speaking out against the repressive Islamic regimes in the middle east?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2007, 02:36 AM
ashleykennedy ashleykennedy is offline
Banned
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,287
uk european union
ashleykennedy is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 23,808
Default Religious Neurotics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by concheet View Post
Poverty as part of renouncing the world is a common theme in Jainism, Buddhism, Hinduism and Christianity. As Jesus put it in Matthew 19:21 Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
Begging as a means of allowing the religious/spiritual to live a religious/spiritual life is a time-honored tradition among many religions. No one requires anyone to give to the Buddhist monk or other monastic. It is a voluntary thing. Jews have always helped struggling Jews. That is one of the things that the religious community does. I really can't see your problem with this. Indeed, as I said, it is high time the Muslims provided the bulk of charity for their Muslim 'brothers' in Palestine.
Judaism is the religion that looks first and foremost at the religion of the recipient.

Donating to charities has nothing to do with spirituality.


Quote:
Originally Posted by concheet View Post
Those desert religions didn't spawn anywhere near as many murders as have atheistic power mongers like Stalin. Hitler in truth was an atheist as well, though he pretended to religion in order to influence the religious. The Roman Emperors and others wanted nothing to do with the desert religions either. They were Gods to themselves. Not being affiliated with a religion doesn't make you one iota better or brighter than someone who is. I can assure you that religion doesn't have a monopoly on neurotics, and being an atheist doesn't mean you aren't one.
Being an Atheist does not preclude being neurotic but being religious means that you definitely are neurotic. Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot all shared a messianic vision of spreading their form of political message. Turning Politics into a religion.

One of the main Roman religions was Mithras. Which is a corruption of the Ahura Mazda or Zoroastrianism.


Quote:
Originally Posted by concheet View Post
If you despise the desert religions because they are nihilistic, why is it that you seem to accept the idea of Islamic dominance over countries that support freedom of religion, such as in Israel...? Why would you be willing to enslave so many people, as the poor people of Iran are, for example, by not speaking out against the repressive Islamic regimes in the middle east?
When Iran decides to invade another country and oppress another people then I will speak out. Until then only Israel in in the position of invader and oppressor.

Israel does not support freedom of religion. Israel uses every glib phrase in the book to deny any religious expression but Judaism. Sorry but I don't subscribe to the medieval conspiracy theory of the clash of civilisations.
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2007, 07:06 PM
halla halla is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 513
halla will become famous soon enoughhalla will become famous soon enough
Credits: 5,182
Default

Quote:
What 242 really means is that the Israeli government will use weasel words to carry out pogroms in Palestine.
pogroms of the palestinians ashley?? let us once again define "pogrom" so that ashley can then list the pogroms of the palestinians at the hands of the israelis.

po·grom (p-grm, pgrm)
n.
An organized, often officially encouraged massacre or persecution of a minority group, especially one conducted against Jews.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pogrom

fools like ashley use massacre, ethnic cleansing, collective punishment, genocide, etc to hyperventilate their antisemitism.

one nitwit, ashley, tried to compare the warsaw ghetto to gaza!!?? remarkable racist ignorance.
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2007, 12:37 PM
ashleykennedy ashleykennedy is offline
Banned
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,287
uk european union
ashleykennedy is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 23,808
Default Pogroms

Quote:
Originally Posted by hasbaratoo View Post
pogroms of the Palestinians Ashley?? let us once again define "pogrom" so that ashley can then list the pogroms of the Palestinians at the hands of the Israelis.

po·grom (p-grm, pgrm)
n.
An organized, often officially encouraged massacre or persecution of a minority group, especially one conducted against Jews.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pogrom

fools like Ashley use massacre, ethnic cleansing, collective punishment, genocide, etc to hyperventilate their anti-Semitism.

one nitwit, Ashley, succeeded in comparing the Warsaw ghetto to the Gaza Ghetto!!?? remarkable racist ignorance.
Wow po·grom (p-grm, pgrm)
n.
An organized, often officially encouraged massacre or persecution of a minority group, especially one conducted against Jews.

But I do note it does not say exclusively to Jews. Now whys that?

Because a pogrom can be carried out against any ethnic group.

Quote:
pogrom noun an organized persecution or massacre of a particular group of people, originally that of Jews in 19c Russia.
http://www.chambersharrap.co.uk/cham...rom&title=21st

again originally but still no exclusive rights

Quote:
pogrom

/pogrm/

• noun an organized massacre of an ethnic group, originally that of Jews in Russia or eastern Europe.

— ORIGIN Russian, ‘devastation’.
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/pogrom?view=uk

still no exclusivity.

so now there you have it pogrom can apply to any ethnic group.

1947

1948

1949

1950

and as you define a massacre as small as 5 deaths

Nebi Musa Riotsften describes by Israelophiles as a massacre:-

Quote:
4th and 7th April Nebi Musa riots. During the springtime Nebi Musa festival April 4-7, 1920, Arabs from the surrounding countryside poured into Jerusalem's Old City for the week-long Nebi Musa (Prophet Moses) and Esther festivals, which fell at the same as the Jews' Passover. Historian Benny Morris writes: "On the morning of April 4 [1920] a procession of six hundred pilgrims from Hebron, a town known for its Muslim orthodoxy, entered the city. There were cheers for 'King' Faisal and Arab independence; Jerusalem mayor Musa Kazim al-Husseini swore the gathered crowd to spill their blood for Palestine…The crowd chanted: "We will drink the blood of the Jews…As the demonstration drew to a close, the head of the Hebronite pilgrims shouted, 'Itbah al-Yahud' [Kill the Jew]—and violence erupted. The crowd went on a rampage, moving toward West Jerusalem: Jews on Jaffa Street were stoned and Jewish shops looted."

Christian Arab Palestinian eye-witness Khalil al-Sakakini (1878-1953), who was head of the Jerusalem Teachers' College at the time of the Nebi Musa Riots, described the scene:
"[A] riot broke out, the people began to run about and stones were thrown at the Jews. The shops were closed and there were screams…I saw a Zionist soldier covered in dust and blood…Afterwards, I saw one Hebronite approach a Jewish shoeshine boy, who hid behind a sack in one of the wall's comers next to Jaffa Gate, and take his box and beat him over the head. He screamed and began to run, his head bleeding and the Hebronite left him and returned to the [Nebi Musa] procession…The riot reached its zenith. All shouted, "Muhammad's religion was born with the sword"…I immediately walked to the municipal garden...my soul is nauseated and depressed by the madness of humankind."

The carnage included 5 Jews killed and 216 wounded, 4 Arabs killed and 23 wounded, and 7 British soldiers wounded. The Nebi Musa procession during Ottoman rule in Palestine had required deployment of thousands of soldiers to keep order in the narrow streets of Jerusalem. The military head of Jerusalem in April 1920, Ronald Storrs, had at his disposal only 180 Palestinian policemen and 8 British police officers! Many of the Arab policemen joined the Arab rioters, rendering the civil police force impotent. The situation—called a "pogrom" by Zionist Jews—had been predicted by Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann who tried to warn Storrs, to no avail

Benny Morris: "Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881-2001". Vintage, 2001, p. 95.

A.J. Sherman: "Mandate Days: British Lives in Palestine 1918-1948." Johns Hopkins Press, 1997, p. 54.
We can now add all dates or events that had greater than 5 deaths.

December 1947 two villages in the central plain -- Deir Ayyub (Final ethnic cleansing by the Giv'ati and Sheva' (Seventh) brigades on March 6, 1948 renamed Mevo Choron) and Beit Affa (Final ethnic cleansing Operation Barak (lightening) Giv'ati Brigade's Second Battalion January 10, 194 -- were raided, and their panicked Palestinian inhabitants fled. Jewish leaders gave the order to drive out as many Palestinians as possible on March 10, 1948. The terror campaign ended six months later.

http://www.palestineremembered.com/al-Ramla/Dayr-Ayyub/

http://www.palestineremembered.com/G...ffa/index.html

December 12 Bus bombings in Haifa and Ramla, by Jewish Militias

December 12, al-Tira an Irgun operation. Terrorist raid by Irgun Zvai Leumi (IZL) raided the village of al-Tira in which there were 13 killed and 10 wounded villagers.
http://www.palestineremembered.com/Haifa/al-Tira/


December 13,1947. Zionist terrorists, believed to be members of Irgun Zvai Leumi, killed 18 Arabs and wounded nearly 60 in Jerusalem, Jaffa and Lydda areas. In Jerusalem, bombs were thrown in an Arab market-place near the Damascus Gate; in Jaffa, bombs were thrown into an Arab cafe; in the Arab village of Al Abbasya, near Lydda, 12 Arabs were killed in an attack with mortars and automatic weapons.

13 December 1947: Irgun also burns down 100 Arab homes in Jaffa


December 18, al-Khisas a Palmach operation. took place in al-Khisas near to the Syrian border and was carried out by Haganah militants, possibly from Palmach. Palmach claim it was in retaliation for casualties suffered in Safad and for the murder of a Jewish citizen by an Arab citizen near al-Khisas. Ten Palestinians were killed, five of them children. Five were wounded.

December 30, Haifa Oil Refinery Irgun attack on Palestinian labourers waiting at the Haifa oil refinery gate. Grenade thrown into crowd of Arab Dock workers exploded killing 6 workers and wounding 42 Arab workers.

January 1 1948, Balad al-Shaykh Haganah operation.The Haganah massively retaliated on the night of 31 December 1947 - 1 January 1948 raiding the villages of Balad al Sheikh and Hawassa, in which many of the refinery's workers lived. The raiding unit's orders were to 'kill maximum adult males'. The raiders penetrated to the centre of Balad al Sheikh, fired into and blew up houses, and pulled out adult males, and shot them. According to the HGS, 'the penetrating units... were forced to deviate from the line agreed upon and in a few cases hit women and children' after being fired upon from inside houses. The Haganah suffered two dead and two injured. Haganah reports put Arab casualties variously at 'about 70 killed', and 21 killed ('including two women and five children') and 41 injured.

Benny Morris “The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee problem Revisited” Cambridge University Press 2004 ISBN 0-512-00967-7 , p. 101

February 14 1948, Sa'sa' village ambush in the Safad district Palmach operation. On February 15, 1948, a Palmach force entered the village during the night and, without resistance, planted explosives against some of the houses. Ten or more houses were totally or partially destroyed and 11 villagers were killed (5 of them small children). According to the official history of the Haganah, the village had been used as a base for Arab fighters.

March 30th to 15th May 1948. The Coastal “clearing” operation undertaken by Haganah, expelling Palestinians from the coastal plain between Haifa and Jaffa.

March 31 1948, Cairo-Haifa train bombing Lehi operation.
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2007, 02:08 PM
ashleykennedy ashleykennedy is offline
Banned
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,287
uk european union
ashleykennedy is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 23,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by concheet View Post
Poverty as part of renouncing the world is a common theme in Jainism, Buddhism, Hinduism and Christianity. As Jesus put it in Matthew 19:21 Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
Begging as a means of allowing the religious/spiritual to live a religious/spiritual life is a time-honored tradition among many religions. No one requires anyone to give to the Buddhist monk or other monastic. It is a voluntary thing. Jews have always helped struggling Jews. That is one of the things that the religious community does. I really can't see your problem with this. Indeed, as I said, it is high time the Muslims provided the bulk of charity for their Muslim 'brothers' in Palestine.

Those desert religions didn't spawn anywhere near as many murders as have atheistic power mongers like Stalin. Hitler in truth was an atheist as well, though he pretended to religion in order to influence the religious. The Roman Emperors and others wanted nothing to do with the desert religions either. They were Gods to themselves. Not being affiliated with a religion doesn't make you one iota better or brighter than someone who is. I can assure you that religion doesn't have a monopoly on neurotics, and being an atheist doesn't mean you aren't one.

If you despise the desert religions because they are nihilistic, why is it that you seem to accept the idea of Islamic dominance over countries that support freedom of religion, such as in Israel...? Why would you be willing to enslave so many people, as the poor people of Iran are, for example, by not speaking out against the repressive Islamic regimes in the middle east?
Quote:
Originally Posted by concheet View Post
blah blah blah...

Each time you post something that is not your own you add a source. Not in previous posts but in the post that you are using. It isn't hard, Hasbara. Just watch hasbaratoo and Hasbara1 for a hint. You can do it. One list.....one source. Another list .....another source. A quote, a source. What's not to understand??
No links Hasbara. What's hard to understand? All your supposed facts no links. Quoting the bible where's the link

Talking of Stalin where's the link

Talking of Hitler where the link

You're full of BS Hasbara1.
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2007, 02:10 PM
ashleykennedy ashleykennedy is offline
Banned
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,287
uk european union
ashleykennedy is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 23,808
Default All my time line Hasbara1

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashleykennedy View Post
Wow po·grom (p-grm, pgrm)
n.
An organized, often officially encouraged massacre or persecution of a minority group, especially one conducted against Jews.

But I do note it does not say exclusively to Jews. Now whys that?

Because a pogrom can be carried out against any ethnic group.



http://www.chambersharrap.co.uk/cham...rom&title=21st

again originally but still no exclusive rights



http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/pogrom?view=uk

still no exclusivity.

so now there you have it pogrom can apply to any ethnic group.

1947

1948

1949

1950

and as you define a massacre as small as 5 deaths

Nebi Musa Riotsften describes by Israelophiles as a massacre:-



We can now add all dates or events that had greater than 5 deaths.

December 1947 two villages in the central plain -- Deir Ayyub (Final ethnic cleansing by the Giv'ati and Sheva' (Seventh) brigades on March 6, 1948 renamed Mevo Choron) and Beit Affa (Final ethnic cleansing Operation Barak (lightening) Giv'ati Brigade's Second Battalion January 10, 194 -- were raided, and their panicked Palestinian inhabitants fled. Jewish leaders gave the order to drive out as many Palestinians as possible on March 10, 1948. The terror campaign ended six months later.

http://www.palestineremembered.com/al-Ramla/Dayr-Ayyub/

http://www.palestineremembered.com/G...ffa/index.html

December 12 Bus bombings in Haifa and Ramla, by Jewish Militias

December 12, al-Tira an Irgun operation. Terrorist raid by Irgun Zvai Leumi (IZL) raided the village of al-Tira in which there were 13 killed and 10 wounded villagers.
http://www.palestineremembered.com/Haifa/al-Tira/


December 13,1947. Zionist terrorists, believed to be members of Irgun Zvai Leumi, killed 18 Arabs and wounded nearly 60 in Jerusalem, Jaffa and Lydda areas. In Jerusalem, bombs were thrown in an Arab market-place near the Damascus Gate; in Jaffa, bombs were thrown into an Arab cafe; in the Arab village of Al Abbasya, near Lydda, 12 Arabs were killed in an attack with mortars and automatic weapons.

13 December 1947: Irgun also burns down 100 Arab homes in Jaffa


December 18, al-Khisas a Palmach operation. took place in al-Khisas near to the Syrian border and was carried out by Haganah militants, possibly from Palmach. Palmach claim it was in retaliation for casualties suffered in Safad and for the murder of a Jewish citizen by an Arab citizen near al-Khisas. Ten Palestinians were killed, five of them children. Five were wounded.

December 30, Haifa Oil Refinery Irgun attack on Palestinian labourers waiting at the Haifa oil refinery gate. Grenade thrown into crowd of Arab Dock workers exploded killing 6 workers and wounding 42 Arab workers.

January 1 1948, Balad al-Shaykh Haganah operation.The Haganah massively retaliated on the night of 31 December 1947 - 1 January 1948 raiding the villages of Balad al Sheikh and Hawassa, in which many of the refinery's workers lived. The raiding unit's orders were to 'kill maximum adult males'. The raiders penetrated to the centre of Balad al Sheikh, fired into and blew up houses, and pulled out adult males, and shot them. According to the HGS, 'the penetrating units... were forced to deviate from the line agreed upon and in a few cases hit women and children' after being fired upon from inside houses. The Haganah suffered two dead and two injured. Haganah reports put Arab casualties variously at 'about 70 killed', and 21 killed ('including two women and five children') and 41 injured.

Benny Morris “The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee problem Revisited” Cambridge University Press 2004 ISBN 0-512-00967-7 , p. 101

February 14 1948, Sa'sa' village ambush in the Safad district Palmach operation. On February 15, 1948, a Palmach force entered the village during the night and, without resistance, planted explosives against some of the houses. Ten or more houses were totally or partially destroyed and 11 villagers were killed (5 of them small children). According to the official history of the Haganah, the village had been used as a base for Arab fighters.

March 30th to 15th May 1948. The Coastal “clearing” operation undertaken by Haganah, expelling Palestinians from the coastal plain between Haifa and Jaffa.

March 31 1948, Cairo-Haifa train bombing Lehi operation.
All my time line Hasbara1 so I guess it makes it my own.
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2008, 01:34 PM
i.beletesri's Avatar
i.beletesri i.beletesri is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 701
i.beletesri is a jewel in the roughi.beletesri is a jewel in the roughi.beletesri is a jewel in the roughi.beletesri is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 6,393
Default

'palestineremembered'

:^)

Last edited by i.beletesri; 03-16-2008 at 01:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 02:11 PM
klipkap klipkap is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 320
klipkap has a spectacular aura aboutklipkap has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 4,067
Default Hey, I can't absorb it all

So tell me - is there agreement by the democratic forces on this forum as to what is more important?:

1) Is it what the non-voting authors on UNSC 242 said they meant when they drafted the resolutions? ...

.... or ....

2) Is it what the majority of voting members said they understood from the documented text when they actually voted on the resolution?

Because if there isn't, then the planet has spent a monstrous amount of nervous energy, taxpayer's money, Middle East blood (Jews and Palestinians), and jeopardy of world peace to find out that the supposedly clear principle of voting, a critical underpinning of the democratic process, is in fact totally irrelevant.

If this is so, can I request a time-out so that I may say a last-ditch prayer for our planet.
Reply With Quote
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 04:21 PM
i.beletesri's Avatar
i.beletesri i.beletesri is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 701
i.beletesri is a jewel in the roughi.beletesri is a jewel in the roughi.beletesri is a jewel in the roughi.beletesri is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 6,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klipkap View Post
So tell me - is there agreement by the democratic forces on this forum as to what is more important?:

1) Is it what the non-voting authors on UNSC 242 said they meant when they drafted the resolutions? ...
"Non-voting authors"?
What?
I see you tried that Lie on the bottom page one; #8.

The Authors mentioned on the first page of this string WERE all voting members- or delegates within.

Lord Caradon, main author, was the British ambassador to the UN. Voted!
Arthur Goldberg, Head of the US delegation. Voted!

They certainly knew what it meant and are quoted.

Kuznetsov, (Head of the Soviet delegation) who VOTED against it BECAUSE he also knew what it meant.

How do you explain that? Arabs Soviet ally and supplier votes Against resolution that returns "all" Arab Land?

I see throughout this string your incredible and stupefying denial.

Last edited by i.beletesri; 03-17-2008 at 04:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 05:53 PM
halla halla is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 513
halla will become famous soon enoughhalla will become famous soon enough
Credits: 5,182
Default

when anything is said and there is a residual ambiguity then one should defer to what the authors of statement meant and not the spin of prejudiced parties. that is why the opinions of resolution 242 authors need to be considered. the authors of 242, Lord Caradon and Arthur Goldberg are needed for clarification.

Quote:
Various other officials have commented on the negotiation of UNSCR 242 and how it relates to Israel's position. The British UN Ambassador at the time, Lord Caradon, who introduced the resolution to the Council, has stated that:

"It would have been wrong to demand that Israel return to its positions of June 4, 1967, because those positions were undesirable and artificial. After all, they were just the places where the soldiers of each side happened to be on the day the fighting stopped in 1948. They were just armistice lines. That's why we didn't demand that the Israelis return to them."
The United States' UN Ambassador at the time, former Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg, has stated that:

"The notable omissions - which were not accidental - in regard to withdrawal are the words "the" or "all" and the "June 5, 1967 lines" ... the resolution speaks of withdrawal from occupied territories without defining the extent of withdrawal. [This would encompass] less than a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from occupied territory, inasmuch as Israel's prior frontiers had proved to be notably Insecure."
palestinefacts
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden