Ah, so you think that Palestine became ' up for grabs ' because the Palestinians rejected a UN General Assembly vote , 181, giving over half of their country to immigrants from Europe. Where in Resolution 181 does it state that territory would be forfeited if either party rejected the partition ?
The Arabs and Palestinians REJECTED them in 1948.
There is nothing in Resolution 242 to offer Israel ' new' borders. On the contrary, 242 opens by emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war . That kills any thought of new borders for Israel stone cold dead.
Then in 1967 the rejected/suggested Borders were again Altered by the UNSC 242 to include a Buffer for Israel to withdraw only to NEW 'secure and recognized' boundaries that were more defendable.
Like Yoadm, you are making it up as you go along. Let's sort it out now so that you don't have any further excuses to disseminate this misinformation.
Where does 181 mention ' forfeit ' ?
Where does 242 mention ' new' borders ?
Pompous and fabricated twaddle.
Last edited by moon; Jun 16 2009 at 08:35 AM.
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, .. Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, ..Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.
Zionism is criminal by default.