They are just playing stupid. They know there is no nuclear weapons program.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomac...eapon-1.419300
Greetings!Mossad, CIA agree Iran has yet to decide to build nuclear weapon
They are just playing stupid. They know there is no nuclear weapons program.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomac...eapon-1.419300
Greetings!Mossad, CIA agree Iran has yet to decide to build nuclear weapon
OJLeb liked this post
I am just curious, do people really not understand the difference between not building a nuke just yet and not having a weapons program or they think they are clever and fooling others?
The article you are quoting states that they are not building a bomb yet. That they are building the infrastructure to build a bomb and enriching huge quantities of uranium to very high levels far beyond the requirements of civilian use is not even disputed. The infrastructure to enrich uranium to weapons grade and build a bomb IS nuclear weapons program.
Jerusalem appears in the Jewish Bible 669 times...The Christian Bible mentions Jerusalem 154 times. In contrast, Jerusalem appears as frequently in the Qur'an as it does in the Hindu Bhagavad-Gita—which is to say, not once.
The refusal to provide access required by the UN designated monitoring agency is non-cooperation. And what are they hiding anyway? The IAEA does not need to know the identities of the scientists to inspect the sites, the idea that a UN body is selling names to Israel is preposterous and Israel has other means (the Mossad) of finding out the names of these scientists anyway.
Oh and the assassinations of Iranian nuclear weapons scientists were widely reported in Western media, you've been misinformed on this account as well.
Jerusalem appears in the Jewish Bible 669 times...The Christian Bible mentions Jerusalem 154 times. In contrast, Jerusalem appears as frequently in the Qur'an as it does in the Hindu Bhagavad-Gita—which is to say, not once.
First, disclosing the names of nuclear scientists was a wrong action and the order of assassination based on that list not any other (you say Mossad or something)
Second, Dear Borat! Tehran's reactor for medical radiation needs 20% and this is why some western countries claimed, we could prepare it for you if you stop enriching and they delayed so we enriched personally. Because Tehran's reactor was near to be empty.
Third, Well, when you say 'the assassinations of Iranian nuclear weapons scientist' you mean Mr. Alimaohammadi were teaching making nukes in our universities? Please stop joking and be rational. We can refer to a variety of majors and references and hand-notes of Iranian universities in detail if you are still in your imagination of making such things. Would you please mention only one course related to your claiming, teaching how to make nukes, in our universities? Please stop it!
And no one tries to support cruelty. Do you mind if I ask you about Israel's nukes? You doubt it whether we think about them or study about them (which is totally fake) but you never want to discuss Israel's?
Hello there!
Personally I believe to be fair we should not concentrate on only 5+1 countries (although not all of them are in agreement or disagreement with us) but the other nationalities have the same right too.
A unique power in policy leads to dictatorship. To get the truth we should refer to both sides and let them speak:
http://www.tehrantimes.com/politics/...game-larijani-
http://tehrantimes.com/politics/9855...nuclear-energy
Scientific examinations in peaceful ways with any percentages is one of the simplest rights we have out of international agreements. Although Iran's government with its own free will accepted suspension several times, during President Khatami and President Ahmadinejad's periods. But people cannot wait forever and accept suspensions one after another and see that western countries never cooperate. (Dear Borat! Not delivering the enriched uranium is called 'not-cooperating)
In one word, what the government has done so far is purely on its own free will and not its duty so the government wants to cooperate although it is not its task based on what NPT sentences say. The committee has to put one step forward too.
Last edited by atabitaraf; Jun 11 2012 at 03:06 AM.
Viv liked this post
We watched in disbelief at the result when Saddam did not take the Western military threat seriously. Then we watched while Libya made the same mistake.
For its own protection, Iran needs to take it seriously and not underestimate the potential for Western action. Russia won't deter them from acting, regardless of Larijani's ill-advised comments.
Dear Viv, When should anyone stand? What is the value of being a human? Please do not compare some leaders in cooperation with their previous supporter with us.
If they could that's for sure they wouldn't waste a minute for the sake of human rights or something. And they do not think about the people's blood as they have never thought for Palestinians' when Mubarak and the other evils cooperated with them.
What should we talk about the defeat when we have the power now? Remember during our revolutionary war when we were at the minimum level of war equipments we won! And all the cruel powers got used to selling illegal chemical bombs to Saddam...
Now world knows the result! As Dagan predicted the five minutes next to it,
Not getting involved to war is for the sake of saving Israel.
Bookmarks