Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Politics by Region > Middle East


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2008, 05:47 PM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,047
usa
DuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant future
Credits: 45,675
Default Iran may be biggest threat to Iraq: U.S. general



Quote:
By Andrew Gray
Tue Mar 4, 2:37 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Iran may pose the greatest long-term threat to Iraq's stability, a U.S. general said on Tuesday, the day after Iran's president wrapped up a visit to Baghdad.

Army Lt. Gen Ray Odierno, who recently ended a 15-month assignment as the No. 2 U.S. commander in Iraq, said Iran continued to train extremist militia groups in Iraq.

Odierno also said he was not surprised Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was able to move around without security problems during his two-day visit to Baghdad as the groups that often target high-profile visitors are Iranian-backed.

"Over the last 12 months, every time a visitor would come from the United States, we'd either foil a rocket attack or the rocket attack happened. And guess what? That's because it was being done by Iranian surrogates," Odierno said.

"And when the government of Iraq holds a meeting, there tends to be rocket attacks. Why's that? Because it's done by Iranian surrogates," he told reporters at the Pentagon.

The U.S. military has repeatedly accused Iran of training, supplying and funding Shi'ite militias in Iraq. Iran has denied the accusations.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080304/...aq_usa_iran_dc

If Iran quit Iraq would be even better off then it already is.
__________________
McCain 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Oderint dum metuant"
"Inartful: clear and straightforward, lacking the artistry that allows subsequent self-refutation and denial."
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A

Last edited by DuH2; 03-04-2008 at 05:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2008, 05:51 PM
BillyBob BillyBob is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 6,127
usa us tennessee
BillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 6,807
Default

As long as we're over there, we might as well invade Iran and be done with this whole islamo-(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) thing instead of dragging it on any longer than we have to.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2008, 05:56 PM
Tedminator's Avatar
Tedminator Tedminator is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,458
usa us florida
Tedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 32,707
Default

So umm, who you two gonna invade first, Iran or China?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2008, 05:59 PM
BillyBob BillyBob is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 6,127
usa us tennessee
BillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 6,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedminator View Post
So umm, who you two gonna invade first, Iran or China?
Iran.

.....
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2008, 06:00 PM
Tedminator's Avatar
Tedminator Tedminator is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,458
usa us florida
Tedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 32,707
Default

kewl. But umm, so it's gonna be you and... what army?

Last edited by Tedminator; 03-04-2008 at 06:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2008, 06:17 PM
sunnyside sunnyside is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,515
usa
sunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 11,109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedminator View Post
kewl. But umm, so it's gonna be you and... what army?
He means not him and our army.

The only thing with Iran is I don't know if they'd want Iraq to be a failed state so much as one that panders to them.

Last edited by sunnyside; 03-04-2008 at 06:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2008, 07:18 PM
Fear-And-Loathing's Avatar
Fear-And-Loathing Fear-And-Loathing is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC baby!!!
Age: 18
Posts: 1,406
usa us maryland
Fear-And-Loathing is a splendid one to beholdFear-And-Loathing is a splendid one to beholdFear-And-Loathing is a splendid one to beholdFear-And-Loathing is a splendid one to beholdFear-And-Loathing is a splendid one to beholdFear-And-Loathing is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 8,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyside View Post
He means not him and our army.

The only thing with Iran is I don't know if they'd want Iraq to be a failed state so much as one that panders to them.
Iran would benefit if we left. It would be able to control the Iraqi government by forming links (which already exist) with the Shia Iraqis. This will then ultimately lead to Iran gaining Iraq's Oil. TUrkey would move into the North, Saudi Arabia might join on the fun. Worse case scenario, but it's floating around I think in a lot of peoples heads on both sides.

So we are filling a power vacuum. We owe it to the Iraqi's to stay there until their country is able to fill the vacuum. If Iran is undermining these efforts, then Iran must be confronted. We need to link Iran directly to the undermining of our efforst in Iraq. Get everyone in on it, get all the major players in on the action and sort it out.
__________________
'May no obstacles arise on the path of enlightenment!
May the enlightened intention of Those Gone to Bliss, past, present and future, be realised,
May I neither be bewildered in migratory existence
Nor I lulled by the solitary quiescence [of nirvana]!
But may I liberate beings throughout the expanse of space!'


- Tibetan Book of the Dead by Padmasambhava
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 03:35 AM
superbadbrutha's Avatar
superbadbrutha superbadbrutha is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Blue Heaven
Posts: 3,407
us north carolina
superbadbrutha is a splendid one to beholdsuperbadbrutha is a splendid one to beholdsuperbadbrutha is a splendid one to beholdsuperbadbrutha is a splendid one to beholdsuperbadbrutha is a splendid one to beholdsuperbadbrutha is a splendid one to beholdsuperbadbrutha is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 14,790
Icon19 My hand is raised

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fear-And-Loathing View Post
Iran would benefit if we left. It would be able to control the Iraqi government by forming links (which already exist) with the Shia Iraqis. This will then ultimately lead to Iran gaining Iraq's Oil. TUrkey would move into the North, Saudi Arabia might join on the fun. Worse case scenario, but it's floating around I think in a lot of peoples heads on both sides.

So we are filling a power vacuum. We owe it to the Iraqi's to stay there until their country is able to fill the vacuum. If Iran is undermining these efforts, then Iran must be confronted. We need to link Iran directly to the undermining of our efforst in Iraq. Get everyone in on it, get all the major players in on the action and sort it out.

Was Iran a threat to Iraq before we got there?

How much control did Iran have in Iraq before we showed up on the scene?


E.Pluribus Unum
__________________
people of power have NO good will and people of good will have NO power.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 03:47 AM
justabubba's Avatar
justabubba justabubba is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,355
us north carolina
justabubba has disabled reputation
Credits: 23,603
Default daft

duh posts an article that shows mahmoud ahmadinejad moves freely thru iraq in a way no western offical could and then posits "If Iran quit Iraq would be even better off then [sic] it already is". that is absurd on its face. the iranian president was a welcomed guest of the puppet government we have propped up at great expense of blood and treasure.
if nothing else proves that the problems remaining in iraq are political and not military in nature then this circumstance, where iraq thumbed its nose at the USA while hosting ahmadinejad, should be proof of it.
those iraqi officials realize that the end game is near; at some near term date US soldiers will no longer be fighting their civil war on their behalf. the shiiteheads recognize that they need to form an alliance with the other shiaa leaders in the region if they are to survive as the dominant power in iraq.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fear-And-Loathing View Post
Iran would benefit if we left. It would be able to control the Iraqi government by forming links (which already exist) with the Shia Iraqis. This will then ultimately lead to Iran gaining Iraq's Oil. TUrkey would move into the North, Saudi Arabia might join on the fun. Worse case scenario, but it's floating around I think in a lot of peoples heads on both sides.

So we are filling a power vacuum. We owe it to the Iraqi's to stay there until their country is able to fill the vacuum. If Iran is undermining these efforts, then Iran must be confronted. We need to link Iran directly to the undermining of our efforst in Iraq. Get everyone in on it, get all the major players in on the action and sort it out.
as one should see from my comments above i absolutely disagree with everything posted by fear et al. look at the gobbledygook: "... forming links (which already exist)" duh huh? fear et al would have us stay in iraq indefinately to prevent the formation of an alliance which he recognizes already exists. there is NO logic there. from there he makes the leap that the iraqis will turn over their nation's oil to iran. fear et al believes that if we left iraq the other powers in the middle east would converge to sort things out. isn't that something we would want? but instead, like rumsfeld, he thinks we know better than the iraqis what they need. but then he turns around and insists we need to get the other players involved in sorting things out. to try to sort thru his argument it appears he wants the other regional players to involve themselves in iraqi affairs only so long as they do by following the bidding of the US. how absurd
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushfan http://www.politicalforum.com/images...s/viewpost.gif
Pelosi calls Mr. Bush a Failure in Eeverything.
You just can't hide a public eduation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusticus View Post
Rove is s the slime on which this whole administration slid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raharu Haruha View Post
And spending money is nothing more than another form of voting.

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 04:55 AM
BillyBob BillyBob is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 6,127
usa us tennessee
BillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 6,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by superbadbrutha View Post
Was Iran a threat to Iraq before we got there?
We aren't in Iran.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Venezuala-Iran-Nicaragua Axis more than just an idle threat DiscerningBlog Political Blogs 0 01-21-2008 03:20 PM
Iran a threat, say Europe allies DuH2 Diplomacy & Conflict Resolution 59 01-17-2008 04:28 AM
Is Iran still a threat? jeffh83 Current Events 112 12-14-2007 12:17 PM
US 'biggest global peace threat' malvo Political Opinions & Beliefs 1 09-04-2006 08:44 AM
Who's the greater threat? Iran or N.Korea? Sleepy Political Opinions & Beliefs 38 01-24-2006 07:41 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden