link...internet explorer

No, because this link isn't the link to your other thread...As well as you haven't added any commentary pertaining to why you find this particular link relevant or what your argument is for using it in the first place.

I doubt you're half as reading comprehensive handicapped as this thread you started makes you appear as. Or is this just yet another way for you to spam the board and avoid following the TOS as well as avoid posting in your original thread WHY you feel that anything from that link is worth the wasted site space you're using up?

Oh, and by the way? That link ISN'T the link to what you posted in the other thread...Or are you incapable of posting the actual site you copied/pasted that tirade from and giving them the rightful credit for THEIR work they deserve and you are using as a means to take credit for when it's not your own?

If you're really here to have a discussion, you're going to have to do more then just post someone else's words or sole links darling.

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter

That's not a link...You provided someone else's words and by presenting it without the specific link from which it came, you are technically plagerising someone else's work and claiming it as your own...

You provided the tidbit with no words of your own about it, but was incomplete in doing so...It's your responsibility to fix it and not appear as a plagerist by providing exactly where you stole it from and the reason why you are trying to promote it as your philosophy.

Here, just so you can't play you weren't aware of the forum rules I'll post the bits you are breaking...

POLITICAL FORUM GUIDELINES
Believe it or not, providing the links as well as your own commentary about the links helps your readers research that link and any/all information that site used to gather that information...You actually do your readers a disservice, as well as the source you're using, by not providing it as well as providing your own input as to why you found that site worth quoting.

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter

I do not distort the news as the zionists do.

Distorting news is rather a zionist speciality..

I think the guy was trying to say that what he posted was from From 'THE AMERICANS' by D. Boorstin in his first post.

Ironically referencing a book is usually considered better than an internet link, but around here it is unlikely anyone has access to that book to verify.

You'd think, though, if they had said something like that it would be referenced on a wide range of websites.

So if you want people to believe you Gadfly I suggest you spend a little time and find a handful of those sites. Or if you actually have the book scan the pages and the pages where the author tells where he got those quotes and host them on photobucket and link them here.

The Benjamin Franklin portion a WELL KNOWN Fraud:

Anti-Semitic Myth: The Franklin "Prophecy" - Part 1 (4 more parts)

http://www.adl.org/special_reports/f...klin_intro.asp


The George Washington 'quote' ALSO A Fraud!

Urban Legends Reference Pages: George Washington on Jews

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/thejews.asp


George Washington's letter to the Jews of Newport, Rhode Island, 1790

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/...l/bigotry.html

“To Bigotry No Sanction, to Persecution No Assistance” - George Washington’s Letter to the Jews of Newport, Rhode Island

Is there a GARBAGE BIN for strings and posters like this?


WHERE ARE THE MODERATORS?

I said your SOURCES distorted/made-up history darling...Not you personally.

And doing so isn't a 'zionist trait'...It's actually a human trait to distort facts to reflect one's point of view. In this instance, sites that are anti-zionist created those quotes in order to foster misinformation for a gullible audience looking for a reason to promote their own anti-semitism.

You haven't reported any news...You've copied/pasted someone else's falsehoods that has no proof other then wishful thinking on their part and gullibility on your part.

Bravo!

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter

No, that isn't what he tried to say...The site he pasted from claimed that the quote they used came from this/that source for Thomas Jefferson alone...If you look at the supposed quote of Washington's, the source claims something that the AA Appleton and Co. wrote...Franklin's supposedly by the claims of being overheard by a Charles Pinckney...

All supposition and gossip, but no actual documentation of those founding father's having said such things...

AND Fly copied/pasted word-by-word what his site had written...None of it was his own words or addition. Go look at the link he finally attached to his first post. Not one word was an original thought or phrase by himself. It was from the American Defense League...And there's another site, the Palanstinian Defense League site, with the same exact page as well.

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter

Very helpful post...Thanks for the links and future useage.

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter