FOREWORD: Our pages document the destruction of America by corrupt Jews; when identified, the Jewish community's first line of defense is 'anti-Semitism', and when that fails, the criminals are labeled as Zionists. After WWII Jews made an industry of the so-called 'holocaust' by creating a victim image in order to keep playing us for $ucker$. We post the text below and what some rabbis said about Zionists, but we will not take the time to categorize the blood$ucker$ because a race that is destroying our country after having been run out of every country in Europe must cleanse itself and shape up or ship out!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Were our Founding Fathers anti-Semites?...........

http://americandefenseleague.com/fathers.htm

.............Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention. (This statement was recorded in the diary of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina.)

THOMAS JEFFERSON: Dispersed as the Jews are, they still form one nation, foreign to the land they live in. (From 'THE AMERICANS' by D. Boorstin)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADL American Defense League USA
dedicated to American interests

In otherwords, outsiders are making claims that these gentlemen said these supposed words about Judiasm yet all other historical writings that are available and actually based off the writings of these men doesn't jive with what your authors are trying to paint of them?

Sorry, but I'll rely more on Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson's personal writtings more then your sources and supposed '2nd hand I heard this/that'...Because from the historical writings from their own hands, they denounced the practice of Christianity and it's overt influence on goverments more then anything else...And if they supposedly felt this way about Judiasm when it was perfectly acceptable to be anti-Semantic, then their own public writings would have had those inclusions as well.

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter

I already figured that out when I put it in the search engine and the only place any of it popped up was a personal blog.

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter

Good.

You can find all his stuff previously posted here:

http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/middle-east/

where he's a joke.

The moderators here.. despite complaints .. will not enforce the link rule..and won't put al-gadfly's quotes in the [zionist] 'Conspiracy Section' where the obviously belong.

I guess none of the dozen of more mods read the section in the last week, and see these obvious bogus strings... nor read my complaints.

Thanks for the link.

As to your opinion of how the mods are handling it, I believe in leaving moderation up to the mods and worrying more about making sure I don't gain their wrath...

As a site owner and moderator myself, I know they'll do their jobs accordingly and in the manner best suited for their site overall. And as leinent as you may think they're being, they're actually pretty balanced in my opinion...I've seen other sites ran alot (stress ALOT) worse and I consider this site right up there in being a good site to participate in...

Not too liberal in allowing members free reign but also not overtly strigent (to the point of smoothering all individuality) towards members either. Very balanced.

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter

This guy has been posting Nonsense for a week.

At least move this Trite OFF TOPIC anti-semitica to the [zionist] 'Conspiracy' section where it belongs.

I have several made complaints previous. Lets see if my string gets any attention.

Well, not meaning to upset you but it's YOUR opinion only about where the topic should be posted or what catagory it falls under...Some may think that it is in the right catagory, as anti-Semitism is by large a middle east issue and cause of war in that region of the world.

I personally don't see it as a conspiracy topic...Nor would I personally feel that it belongs in an off-topic forum either as it is about politics...If anything, I'd have found it more suited to be under the 'United States' portion of regional politics...Afterall it is specifically talking about our founding fathers, no matter how off-base it is, and would fit there much better then where it is currently or where you're suggesting it to be...

But either way it's really no big deal in my mind where it is and the mods are perfectly in their right to leave it where it is cause it is discussing politics (even if it's OLD politics) and reflects alot about our own country's position in regards to the Isreali-Palistani situation and our support for/against it.

And unless you, me, or anyone else is put into a moderator position on this site, then it's really none of our business to tell them where a topic should be or whether or not it should be allowed...

We have the right to report a post through the 'report a post' option...But the moderators and owners are not obligated to see it our way and do as we feel they should do...

So leave the moderating up to them, they do a great job by the way, and keep our own noses clean and handle moderating our own forums not someone else's.

Save the indignation for IF the poster gets rude, obscene, and abusive towards yourself or a member...THAT'S when someone's posting is a problem...Not their lack of knowledge on a subject or if they post it in the section you feel is best.

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter

Rather then reposting the same tripe you've already posted, you should have posted a link to that tripe instead...And at least ATTEMPT to try and defend what you've already posted with something like your own opinion to what it supposedly means to you?

Otherwise, you just come across as not someone here to contribute to a discussion, but just to spam the board with your own little perverted twist of history about our forefathers.

__________________
I would rather dwell in the dim fog of superstition than in air rarified to nothing but the air pump of unbelief; in which the panting breast expires, vainly and convulsively gasping for breath. -Richter

http://monabaker.com/quotes.htm

Are you happy now ?