Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Politics by Region > Middle East


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 01:43 PM
f0ca1's Avatar
f0ca1 f0ca1 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Greatest City in the world
Posts: 3,156
usa us new york
f0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Fox View Post
They own our oil, for now.
Lol.

If they own it, it's not ours.

Unless I own your stuff.



I'm pretty sure libertarians believe in a right to ownership.

But, then, libertarians probably wouldn't think picking a side in a religious conflict would be a wise choice for the big government.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 04:34 PM
White Fox's Avatar
White Fox White Fox is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 札幌市
Posts: 6,069
japan no vest norway
White Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 30,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f0ca1 View Post
Lol.

If they own it, it's not ours.

Unless I own your stuff.



I'm pretty sure libertarians believe in a right to ownership.

But, then, libertarians probably wouldn't think picking a side in a religious conflict would be a wise choice for the big government.
I think you might have missed the sarcasm.

Anyway, Libertarians do believe in the inalienable right to property. However, Libertarians also believe in the prevention of monopolies. OPEC currently represents a near monopoly on petroleum resources. Witness the effect of their embargo. In a freer market system, this would have been economically disastrous for OPEC because they would have been simply forced out of the market and the price of oil would have only been moderately affected. The problem lies in the fact that OPEC is an international organization, and it is therefore hard to impose monopoly restricting regulations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPEC

If military force is the only way to stop this monopoly, then it is necessary to the functioning of the world. Due to the incompetence of the UN, the US has to play this role in the world, and it should. But we should also recognize that the Iraq war was not about oil, it was about finding WMD.
__________________
"I am in favor of Free Trade"

--Karl Marx
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 05:09 PM
justabubba's Avatar
justabubba justabubba is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,941
us north carolina
justabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 26,746
Default thanks for the laugh

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Fox View Post
I think you might have missed the sarcasm.

Anyway, Libertarians do believe in the inalienable right to property. However, Libertarians also believe in the prevention of monopolies. OPEC currently represents a near monopoly on petroleum resources. Witness the effect of their embargo. In a freer market system, this would have been economically disastrous for OPEC because they would have been simply forced out of the market and the price of oil would have only been moderately affected. The problem lies in the fact that OPEC is an international organization, and it is therefore hard to impose monopoly restricting regulations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPEC

If military force is the only way to stop this monopoly, then it is necessary to the functioning of the world. Due to the incompetence of the UN, the US has to play this role in the world, and it should. But we should also recognize that the Iraq war was not about oil, it was about finding WMD.
he may have missed the sarcasm but you have not missed an opportunity to make the USA the world's policeman. and you assert that we are also entitled to take the oil of other for our own purposes under the disguise of ending a near monopoly. [how is something a near monopoly ... is that like being a little pregnant?]
so, when china becomes the dominent world power, i guess you will have no problem with it taking whatever assets it wants which happen to be held by another country ... gotta eliminate all of those near monopolies you know
oh yea, that was funny that you make sure we remember the propaganda that the war was about WMDs that didn't exist and not about the oil that we crave
__________________
i think sex is better than logic, but I can't prove it
"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free and good men die like dogs every day.
And there's also a bad side."
-- Hunter S. Thompson
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 05:15 PM
White Fox's Avatar
White Fox White Fox is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 札幌市
Posts: 6,069
japan no vest norway
White Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 30,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
he may have missed the sarcasm but you have not missed an opportunity to make the USA the world's policeman. and you assert that we are also entitled to take the oil of other for our own purposes under the disguise of ending a near monopoly. [how is something a near monopoly ... is that like being a little pregnant?]
so, when china becomes the dominent world power, i guess you will have no problem with it taking whatever assets it wants which happen to be held by another country ... gotta eliminate all of those near monopolies you know
oh yea, that was funny that you make sure we remember the propaganda that the war was about WMDs that didn't exist and not about the oil that we crave
It would be nice if the UN was competent enough to police the world, but it is not, and to hope for it is being hopelessly optimistic. OPEC is a near monopoly, and the results of its embargo prove it. Read the wiki article I posted a link to for more information, that's why I put it there. It is not like being a little pregnant. The conspiracy theory about Bush wanting to invade Iraq for its oil is a conspiracy, unless you have any evidence to support your theory. If China wants to help ensure a global free market, then let them help. And maybe the UN will eventually be able to function for itself.
__________________
"I am in favor of Free Trade"

--Karl Marx
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 12:10 AM
f0ca1's Avatar
f0ca1 f0ca1 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Greatest City in the world
Posts: 3,156
usa us new york
f0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Fox View Post
But we should also recognize that the Iraq war was not about oil, it was about finding WMD.
That, oddly enough, never turned up.

At least be honest about it. McCain has been...


It's about oil. It's all about oil. Our country is a junky for the stuff, and this president acts like junky-in-chief.


Holding hands with a frickin' authoritarian king. Selling him weapons. Whatever it takes.

And the stuff trickles in at a maximum profits to the despot.

While his subjects, who never see that wealth, plot to kill us.



Wouldn't a wiser investment be in alternative fuels? Isn't it time to try and detox?

Even if we fail to do it, the worst thing that happens is that we waste some money.

If we pick sides in a sectarian conflict in the greater middle east, it will cost us tons of money, there's no guarantee it will go our way, and when it's over, we're no better off than we were before.


Alternative energy is first and foremost a national security concern.

God Help Us if China develops something first.

Last edited by f0ca1; 05-16-2008 at 12:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iran Smuggling Missiles Into Lebanon Through Turkey DiscerningBlog Political Blogs 0 03-04-2008 06:10 PM
US, Saudis Want Syria Out Of Lebanon SweetnessBlog Political Blogs 0 03-01-2008 01:00 PM
Warning (4th Cable Cut) Iran Invasion may be Imminent!!! GreedIsYourGod Warfare / Military 33 02-09-2008 04:17 PM
Real reasoned discourse at Sharp as a Marble ArmedBlog Political Blogs 0 01-30-2008 05:30 PM
Sharp Drop Seen in US Deaths in Iraq DuH2 Current Events 4 10-23-2007 04:09 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden