Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Politics by Region > Middle East


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 11:35 AM
erooniog erooniog is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
erooniog is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Underground Youth Movement in IRAN!

You always hear and read about the "Youth" of Iran being "Pro-Western." Well here they are RAW, ready to defend their country against the colonial West:

http://irannegah.com/Video.aspx?id=720

- Hichkas, Pioneer of Iranian Rap releases New Music Video (w./ Subtitles!) from the Streets of Tehran for the Anti-War Song "Ye Mosht Sarbaz" (Bunch of Soldiers)

P.S. For those of you who do not know when seeing the video what 021 is, it is the Area/City Code for Tehran
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 11:40 AM
BillyBob BillyBob is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 6,127
usa us tennessee
BillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 6,807
Default

That's hilarious! Iran has their own version of 'wiggers'!!!



Last edited by BillyBob; 05-17-2008 at 11:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 12:14 PM
Perham's Avatar
Perham Perham is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tehran, Iran
Age: 20
Posts: 1,385
iran
Perham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant futurePerham has a brilliant future
Credits: 1,500
Default

good find. that's quite new.
look out, iranian soldiers may be not so powerful, but these gangsters, they're dangerous!! just kidding you know!
__________________
I crave therefore I am and that is all I ever feel
I hoped you'd understand, One love, One pain, One enemy
I toast to misery, as I dig into the devil's bone
And for eternity the pain became me
Unholy me alone...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2008, 10:15 AM
erooniog erooniog is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
erooniog is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

BillyBob is just mad because these youth arent putting Vaseline on their butts and bending over for the US to come invade. Sorry BillyBob are youth are much brighter and smarter than that. They recognize Uncle Sam for what he is. A money hungry BEAST!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2008, 10:20 AM
eleanoraquitaine eleanoraquitaine is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Heaven
Posts: 1,073
usa uk yorkshire
eleanoraquitaine is a glorious beacon of lighteleanoraquitaine is a glorious beacon of lighteleanoraquitaine is a glorious beacon of lighteleanoraquitaine is a glorious beacon of lighteleanoraquitaine is a glorious beacon of lighteleanoraquitaine is a glorious beacon of light
Credits: 6,997
Default

I never bought this crap about iran's young mostly being good muslims. islam itself is inherently violent and evil. the only good muslim is a muslim that doesn't follow islam, which means they really aren't muslim. They might still call themselves a muslim for some very strange reason but it is impossible to have a truly good muslim. If they follow islam, they follow evil. Its just like the nazis. The only good nazis were those who didn't believe in nazism and tried to either lay low to survive or actually fought against the evil ideology. Any good muslim would fight against islam, and really they should pick another name for themselves that distinguished themselves from the evil of islam, like reformed muslim, or civilized arab, or something different from the dirty word muslim.
__________________
Qur'an:8:39 Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.
Qur'an:8:67 It is not fitting for any prophet to have prisoners until he has made a great slaughter in the land.
Qur'an 8:12 I will terrorize the unbelievers...Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes.
Qur'an 9:5 Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, torture them, and lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 04:40 PM
Akira Akira is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 92
Akira has disabled reputation
Credits: 684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eleanoraquitaine View Post
I never bought this crap about iran's young mostly being good muslims. islam itself is inherently violent and evil. the only good muslim is a muslim that doesn't follow islam, which means they really aren't muslim. They might still call themselves a muslim for some very strange reason but it is impossible to have a truly good muslim. If they follow islam, they follow evil. Its just like the nazis. The only good nazis were those who didn't believe in nazism and tried to either lay low to survive or actually fought against the evil ideology. Any good muslim would fight against islam, and really they should pick another name for themselves that distinguished themselves from the evil of islam, like reformed muslim, or civilized arab, or something different from the dirty word muslim.

OK, so fill me in again. Which religion is the good one? I'm having difficulty telling them apart so a few pointers would be good.


I'm also confused how a good Muslim would fight against Islam. The two are sort of the same thing. It's like, 'a good christian is one who hates and fights against the ideals of christ'. Sort of redundant.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 04:57 PM
i.beletesri's Avatar
i.beletesri i.beletesri is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 904
i.beletesri is just really nicei.beletesri is just really nicei.beletesri is just really nicei.beletesri is just really nicei.beletesri is just really nice
Credits: 8,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akira View Post


I'm also confused how a good Muslim would fight against Islam.
The two are sort of the same thing. It's like, 'a good christian is one who hates and fights against the ideals of christ'. Sort of redundant.
Don't be confused!
HERE is how a 'Good Muslim' would/Does fight against Islam-
and she and Other reformers Lives are in Danger Every Day for Saying just How.


Irshad Manji: Denial is scourge of Islam

August 23, 2005

DEAR Prime Minister John Howard,

Today you meet 14 of Australia's top Muslim clerics at the Islamic summit. As my own Prime Minister in Canada recently did, you'll be asking for their support in the effort to stop Islamist terror.

But sir, as a reform-minded Muslim,
I urge you to keep this in mind: Dialogue will not be enough. You'll need to extract honesty about the practice of Islam today. And for that you'll have to move beyond platitudes to ask pointed questions.

Why are Westerners, both Muslim and non-Muslim, being held hostage by what's happening between the Palestinians and the Israelis?

What's with the stubborn streak of anti-Semitism in Islam?

Who's the real coloniser of Muslims, the US or Saudi Arabia?

Above all, why did the frenzy of fatwas against terror begin only recently?
After New York. After Kabul.
After Bali. After Beslan.
After Baghdad. After Beirut.
After Madrid. After Moscow.
After Istanbul. After London.
Why has clerical condemnation taken so bloody long?

While the London bombings have roused many Muslims from our slumber, we still have trouble. The trouble with Islam today is that literalism is mainstream.

Even moderate Muslims take the Koran as the final word of God: unfiltered, unchanged and unchangeable.
This Supremacy Complex inhibits us from asking hard questions about what happens when faith becomes dogma.
Such a path can lead only to a dead end of more violence.


Please ask the imams: Is this the justice they seek for the world that God has leased to us all? If it's not, then why don't more of them say so publicly?

What they're bound to say is that Muslims are the targets of a backlash. It's true that from time to time we're subject to hate. Our community leaders are adroit at showing us how to assert our rights, something most of us wouldn't have in Islamic countries. In the spirit of reciprocity, it's worth asking: What about the Koran's incitement of hate against Jews? Shouldn't Muslims who invoke the Koran to justify anti-Semitism be open to a lawsuit? Or would this amount to more backlash? What makes Muslims righteous and everybody else racist?

Which brings me to the R-word: Racist. I beg you Not to back off if you hear it.
Remind your accusers that in the past 100 years alone, more Muslims have been tortured and murdered at the hands of other Muslims than at the hands of any foreign imperial power. That's not to deny Western colonialism. It's to point out that colonialism comes in many shades and colours. When you stand up for human rights in Islam, the people you're helping are ordinary Muslims. What's so racist about that? Ask the imams.

They'll want to assure you that a faith that violates human rights isn't true Islam. Excellent. That's why you're meeting them: because you believe that Muslims are capable of being more thoughtful and humane than the terrorists suggest.

But for the sake of an honest discussion, please challenge the clerics to come clean about the Islam they reflexively defend.

Is this Islam in its real form or Islam as an ideal? Let's face it; everything is wonderful as an ideal. Communism is egalitarian as an ideal. Capitalism is fair as an ideal. The US constitution guarantees liberty and justice for all as an ideal. Muslims know the reality is different. As people of conscience, Muslims have to address Islam's realities, too.

The prophet Mohammed would have embraced this distinction between the real and the ideal. When he was asked to define religion, he reportedly replied that religion is the way we conduct ourselves towards others. A fine definition, simple without being simplistic. Yet, by that definition, how we Muslims behave, not in theory but in actuality, is Islam, which means our complacency is Islam. It also means the power is ours to restore Islam's better angels, those who care about the human rights of women and minorities.

To do that, though, we have to snap out of our denial. By insisting that there's Nothing the matter with Islam today, we're sweeping the Reality of our Religion under the rug of Islam as an ideal, thereby absolving ourselves of responsibility for our fellow human beings, including Muslims, in Australia and beyond.

Prime Minister, you have a sterling opportunity to tell the imams that you won't be hoodwinked by silky-smooth chatter. Diplomacy is not accountability. Winning this war will require one more than the other.

http://www.Muslim-Refusenik.com/news...-05-08-22.html


Bravo Irshad! Now you know "how a Good Muslim Fights Islam". (and liberal Moral Relativism/equivalence)
__________________

If you support 'Fairtax' you are either Very Rich or Very Stupid.
The latter group having been convinced/Duped as 'Good Libertarians' or 'Good Republicans' that they should support this Scam because it sounds Individualistic/Self-responsible, and because they are economically Naive enough to believe it's FAKE low stated rate.

Last edited by i.beletesri; 05-19-2008 at 05:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 06:31 PM
Akira Akira is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 92
Akira has disabled reputation
Credits: 684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i.beletesri View Post
Don't be confused!
HERE is how a 'Good Muslim' would/Does fight against Islam-
and she and Other reformers Lives are in Danger Every Day for Saying just How.


Irshad Manji: Denial is scourge of Islam

August 23, 2005

DEAR Prime Minister John Howard,

Today you meet 14 of Australia's top Muslim clerics at the Islamic summit. As my own Prime Minister in Canada recently did, you'll be asking for their support in the effort to stop Islamist terror.

But sir, as a reform-minded Muslim,
I urge you to keep this in mind: Dialogue will not be enough. You'll need to extract honesty about the practice of Islam today. And for that you'll have to move beyond platitudes to ask pointed questions.

Why are Westerners, both Muslim and non-Muslim, being held hostage by what's happening between the Palestinians and the Israelis?

What's with the stubborn streak of anti-Semitism in Islam?

Who's the real coloniser of Muslims, the US or Saudi Arabia?

Above all, why did the frenzy of fatwas against terror begin only recently?
After New York. After Kabul.
After Bali. After Beslan.
After Baghdad. After Beirut.
After Madrid. After Moscow.
After Istanbul. After London.
Why has clerical condemnation taken so bloody long?

While the London bombings have roused many Muslims from our slumber, we still have trouble. The trouble with Islam today is that literalism is mainstream.

Even moderate Muslims take the Koran as the final word of God: unfiltered, unchanged and unchangeable.
This Supremacy Complex inhibits us from asking hard questions about what happens when faith becomes dogma.
Such a path can lead only to a dead end of more violence.


Please ask the imams: Is this the justice they seek for the world that God has leased to us all? If it's not, then why don't more of them say so publicly?

What they're bound to say is that Muslims are the targets of a backlash. It's true that from time to time we're subject to hate. Our community leaders are adroit at showing us how to assert our rights, something most of us wouldn't have in Islamic countries. In the spirit of reciprocity, it's worth asking: What about the Koran's incitement of hate against Jews? Shouldn't Muslims who invoke the Koran to justify anti-Semitism be open to a lawsuit? Or would this amount to more backlash? What makes Muslims righteous and everybody else racist?

Which brings me to the R-word: Racist. I beg you Not to back off if you hear it.
Remind your accusers that in the past 100 years alone, more Muslims have been tortured and murdered at the hands of other Muslims than at the hands of any foreign imperial power. That's not to deny Western colonialism. It's to point out that colonialism comes in many shades and colours. When you stand up for human rights in Islam, the people you're helping are ordinary Muslims. What's so racist about that? Ask the imams.

They'll want to assure you that a faith that violates human rights isn't true Islam. Excellent. That's why you're meeting them: because you believe that Muslims are capable of being more thoughtful and humane than the terrorists suggest.

But for the sake of an honest discussion, please challenge the clerics to come clean about the Islam they reflexively defend.

Is this Islam in its real form or Islam as an ideal? Let's face it; everything is wonderful as an ideal. Communism is egalitarian as an ideal. Capitalism is fair as an ideal. The US constitution guarantees liberty and justice for all as an ideal. Muslims know the reality is different. As people of conscience, Muslims have to address Islam's realities, too.

The prophet Mohammed would have embraced this distinction between the real and the ideal. When he was asked to define religion, he reportedly replied that religion is the way we conduct ourselves towards others. A fine definition, simple without being simplistic. Yet, by that definition, how we Muslims behave, not in theory but in actuality, is Islam, which means our complacency is Islam. It also means the power is ours to restore Islam's better angels, those who care about the human rights of women and minorities.

To do that, though, we have to snap out of our denial. By insisting that there's Nothing the matter with Islam today, we're sweeping the Reality of our Religion under the rug of Islam as an ideal, thereby absolving ourselves of responsibility for our fellow human beings, including Muslims, in Australia and beyond.

Prime Minister, you have a sterling opportunity to tell the imams that you won't be hoodwinked by silky-smooth chatter. Diplomacy is not accountability. Winning this war will require one more than the other.

http://www.Muslim-Refusenik.com/news...-05-08-22.html


Bravo Irshad! Now you know "how a Good Muslim Fights Islam". (and liberal Moral Relativism/equivalence)


There's no moral relativism in saying that someone who fights against Islam is not a muslim.


All you have stated is that reformers are trying to adjust the way people are interpreting and acting on it.

Christians don't fight christianity, but they can change its practice. If they fought against Christianity, absolute, as elenor implies, then they aren't actually Muslims, but anti-Muslims. It's like saying a good American is one who fights against being American....like, umm, what???

It's absurd to say that good muslims are the ones who fight Islam not because it's an ideological false statement, but because it is a syntactical one. I appreciate all the rah rah and whatnot but it's just bad english.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 07:00 PM
i.beletesri's Avatar
i.beletesri i.beletesri is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 904
i.beletesri is just really nicei.beletesri is just really nicei.beletesri is just really nicei.beletesri is just really nicei.beletesri is just really nice
Credits: 8,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akira View Post
There's no moral relativism in saying that someone who fights against Islam is not a muslim.
All you have stated is that reformers are trying to adjust the way people are interpreting and acting on it.

Christians don't fight christianity, but they can change its practice. If they fought against Christianity, absolute, as elenor implies, then they aren't actually Muslims, but anti-Muslims. It's like saying a good American is one who fights against being American....like, umm, what???

It's absurd to say that good muslims are the ones who fight Islam not because it's an ideological false statement, but because it is a syntactical one. I appreciate all the rah rah and whatnot but it's just bad english.
1. You asked, brought up the apparent contradiction of How a good Muslim would fight against Islam.
I showed how.

She is Fighting Islam as it is Practised and Interpreted by the Mainstream NOW.. doing so IS fighting it.

2. There IS Moral Relativism (nice try on changing what I was referring to) in saying that criticism of Islam is like Criticism of other religions... and that you "call it out" equally. (at least against Muslims you have)

Islam is Not at, or even Near, the same stage of secularism or liberality as other religions and it's questionable whether True Islam Can be.
Thus eleanor has a point and it's Not 'Racist' to point out Islam has a Specific and more serious problem than other religions.. despite YOUR previous PC attempts at criticizing those "Bigots" equally.
(Manji also adresses this)

I am giving the benefit of the doubt by posting the single Digit percent like Manji, who think of themselves as reformers but may indeed be Apostate/Fighting Islam. (an Islamic Capital Crime).
Perhaps only a Hundred years.. or 500 will tell.
I wish the World had the luxury of time in this age of WMD.

3. "It's absurd to say that good muslims are the ones who fight Islam not because it's an ideological false statement..
Again, Not at all.
Totally Fallacious statement on your part.

It's a practical statement fom a Western point of view and from the point of view of the author/a Muslim herself.

4. THIS is the Moral Relativism I do refer to and which virtually all Westerm Liberals, and especially Leftists are guilty and which again brings home whether Islam is even Fightable from Within.
Someone who doesn't think it's fightable from within/Left but isn't that far from Manji in actuality:
Quote:

The Trouble With Islam
Sadly, mainstream Muslim teaching accepts and promotes violence.


by TAWFIK HAMID
April 3, 2007
Wall Street Journal

Not many years ago the brilliant Orientalist, Bernard Lewis, published a short history of the Islamic world's decline, entitled "What Went Wrong?" Astonishingly, there was, among many Western "progressives," a vocal dislike for the title. It is a false premise, these critics protested. They ignored Mr. Lewis's implicit statement that things have been, or could be, right.

But indeed, there is much that is clearly wrong with the Islamic world.

Women are stoned to death and undergo clitorectomies.
Gays hang from the gallows under the approving eyes of the proponents of Shariah, the legal code of Islam.
Sunni and Shia massacre each other daily in Iraq.
Palestinian mothers teach 3-year-old boys and girls the ideal of martyrdom.
One would expect the orthodox Islamic establishment to evade or dismiss these complaints, but less happily, the non-Muslim priests of enlightenment in the West have come, actively and passively, to the Islamists' defense.

These "progressives" frequently cite the need to examine "root causes."
In this they are correct: Terrorism is only the manifestation of a disease and not the disease itself. But the root-causes are quite different from what they think. As a former member of Jemaah Islamiya, a group led by al Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, I know firsthand that the inhumane teaching in Islamist ideology can transform a young, benevolent mind into that of a terrorist. Without confronting the ideological roots of radical Islam it will be impossible to combat it. While there are many ideological "rootlets" of Islamism, the main tap root has a name--Salafism, or Salafi Islam, a violent, ultra-conservative version of the religion.

It is vital to grasp that traditional and even Mainstream Islamic teaching accepts and promotes violence.


Shariah, for example, allows apostates to be killed, permits beating women to discipline them, seeks to subjugate non-Muslims to Islam as dhimmis and justifies declaring war to do so. It exhorts good Muslims to exterminate the Jews before the "end of days." The near deafening silence of the Muslim majority against these barbaric practices is evidence enough that there is something fundamentally wrong.

The grave predicament we face in the Islamic world is the virtual lack of approved, theologically rigorous interpretations of Islam that clearly challenge the abusive aspects of Shariah. Unlike Salafism, more liberal branches of Islam, such as Sufism, typically do not provide the essential theological base to nullify the cruel proclamations of their Salafist counterparts. And so, for more than 20 years I have been developing and working to establish a theologically-rigorous Islam that teaches peace.

Yet it is ironic and discouraging that many non-Muslim, Western intellectuals--who unceasingly claim to support human rights--have become obstacles to reforming Islam. Political correctness among Westerners obstructs unambiguous criticism of Shariah's inhumanity.
(((i.beletesri note: THAT'S The Moral Relativism I Speak Of))) They find socioeconomic or political Excuses for Islamist terrorism such as poverty, colonialism, discrimination or the existence of Israel. What incentive is there for Muslims to demand reform when Western "progressives" pave the way for Islamist barbarity? (((And This))) Indeed, if the problem is not one of religious beliefs, it leaves one to wonder why Christians who live among Muslims under identical circumstances refrain from contributing to wide-scale, systematic campaigns of terror.
[....]
The rest at:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editor...l?id=110009890
So we have Two people, one ex-Muslim, one 'reformer' who point to the SAME Problems with Mainstream Islam.
Mainstream Islam IS Islam.
One feels it can be fixed the other fundamentally flawed.

One of the basic problems of Liberals and Leftists is the "All religions are the same" routine, and that's it's Bigoted to criticize one and not the other.
This is Incorrect and shows the shallowest of PC-ism and a complete Lack of understanding of Islam.
But please, feel free to try and 'Syntactic' it away!
__________________

If you support 'Fairtax' you are either Very Rich or Very Stupid.
The latter group having been convinced/Duped as 'Good Libertarians' or 'Good Republicans' that they should support this Scam because it sounds Individualistic/Self-responsible, and because they are economically Naive enough to believe it's FAKE low stated rate.

Last edited by i.beletesri; 05-19-2008 at 07:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bill Clinton Commuted Weather Underground SweetnessBlog Political Blogs 0 05-01-2008 09:50 PM
In Praise of Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground DemocratsBlog Political Blogs 1 04-17-2008 05:25 PM
Bi-partisanship an Underground Success JavaBlack Political Opinions & Beliefs 2 05-03-2007 11:10 AM
Thrown out of the Democratic underground f100supersabr Political Opinions & Beliefs 11 09-02-2005 09:08 AM
Republican Underground, new site! Tom Off-Topic Chat 5 04-01-2004 10:52 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden