Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Other Political Discussion > Conspiracy Theories > New World Order


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2007, 12:27 PM
hellvsheaven's Avatar
hellvsheaven hellvsheaven is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 141
usa
hellvsheaven is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 710
Default The New Law

The President passed a new law last spring stating, that he could suspend the upcoming president election indefenitly if a National Emergency happens.

Could this be a Conspiracy?? Could this just happen to be the beginning of Dictatorship in America? Is President Bush the next Hitler?
__________________
In Fort Jackson, South Carolina! Be back in November!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2007, 08:44 PM
Schizowallflower's Avatar
Schizowallflower Schizowallflower is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Monroe, MI
Posts: 265
Schizowallflower is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,653
Send a message via MSN to Schizowallflower Send a message via Yahoo to Schizowallflower
Default Hmm...

I think, it could be the same as if Ross Perot was elected. Many say he would have put the nation under Marshall Law. And, as Commander in Chief, whatever he said would have went. Therefore, he could have said there would be no more elections, and probably would have still president today.

President Bush said in a speech "I have no intentions on being a lame duck president." I thought lame-duck meant that you aren't able to go up for re-election. So unless he does something like that, he's a lame-duck president.

Unless I'm understanding everything wrong. If so, please feel free to correct me.

I don't think it's as much a conspiracy as it is greed.
__________________
Believing that McAfee is going to protect you from hackers and viruses is exactly like believing that republicans can actually protect you from terrorists.

When the rich wage war, it's the poor who die.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:09 AM
hellvsheaven's Avatar
hellvsheaven hellvsheaven is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 141
usa
hellvsheaven is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 710
Default ...

Well I think it's a bunch of non-sense, though if I am wrong than hey, I made a mistake. However, if this reall was to happen then I think America would be in Jeporady.
__________________
In Fort Jackson, South Carolina! Be back in November!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2008, 06:58 AM
HillaryorRonPaul HillaryorRonPaul is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 90
HillaryorRonPaul is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 429
Default

Devilvis wants bush out of office!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2008, 09:04 PM
B-rett's Avatar
B-rett B-rett is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Age: 18
Posts: 408
usa us washington
B-rett is just really niceB-rett is just really niceB-rett is just really niceB-rett is just really nice
Credits: 2,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schizowallflower View Post
I think, it could be the same as if Ross Perot was elected. Many say he would have put the nation under Marshall Law. And, as Commander in Chief, whatever he said would have went. Therefore, he could have said there would be no more elections, and probably would have still president today.

President Bush said in a speech "I have no intentions on being a lame duck president." I thought lame-duck meant that you aren't able to go up for re-election. So unless he does something like that, he's a lame-duck president.

Unless I'm understanding everything wrong. If so, please feel free to correct me.

I
Lame Duck president refers to a president ruling with either the opposing party in power, or a president during the time between the election and the inauguration of a new President. This means that the president's term is pretty much over. When Bush said that he would not be a lame-duck President, he meant that his term was not over and that he still had an agenda to perform. It is nothing nefarious

Furthermore, I would like a link to see this law. I seriously doubt that it was passed considering the Democratic Congress. I also think that it would pretty much be overturned by the courts.
__________________
Ad majorem Dei gloriam- For the Greater Glory of God
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden