Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Warfare / Military > Nuclear, Chemical & Biological Weapons


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2006, 12:13 AM
Wildbore's Avatar
Wildbore Wildbore is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Thunder Bay, ON
Posts: 1,293
canada ca ontario
Wildbore has a spectacular aura aboutWildbore has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 9,231
Send a message via MSN to Wildbore
Default Hans Blix commission releases WMD report

Quote:
UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Iran and Israel should both end nuclear enrichment as part of a renewed drive to rid the Middle East of weapons of mass destruction, a panel led by former U.N. arms inspector Hans Blix said on Thursday.

The Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission also recommended adopting a treaty banning nuclear testing by all nuclear powers that have not already done so, including the United States, China, India and Pakistan.

"The reality is that if the U.S. were to ratify, then China would. If China did, India would. If India did, Pakistan would. If Pakistan did, then Iran would. It would set in motion a good domino effect," Blix told a news conference.

The recommendations were among 60 offered by the panel, set up by Sweden's government three years ago to pump new life into global disarmament efforts and help free the world of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.

Blix was in New York to give the report to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who in a statement called on the international community to consider its findings.

The report could embarrass Israel, which has never admitted having nuclear arms and, unlike Iran, is not a member of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Blix led the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency, for 16 years before heading the U.N. search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq just ahead of the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

Blix said the panel felt efforts to convince Iran to suspend its enrichment of uranium and other sensitive nuclear programs were too narrow.

If the focus were placed on all Middle Eastern states, "That would mean that Iran would refrain from this. It would also mean that Israel would commit itself not to make more plutonium. They are assumed to have about 200 nuclear weapons," Blix told reporters.

Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria and other regional states would also be asked to refrain from enrichment, he added, which "would walk in the direction of a zone free of weapons of mass destruction rather than away from it."

The report was issued as major-power foreign ministers conferred in Vienna on a plan to increase pressure on Tehran to curb its nuclear ambitions, as called for by the IAEA and the U.N. Security Council.

Blix said the West should recognize Tehran might feel threatened by the presence of U.S. troops in nearby Iraq and Afghanistan. For that reason the commission said countries acknowledging nuclear arsenals should offer legally binding assurances to those countries without atomic arms that they will not come under nuclear attack. The West has so far refused to do this in the case of Iran.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060601/...s_blix_un_dc_2

I never knew that the US was ratifying the comprehensive test ban treaty. No wonder other countries won't sign and ratify international agreements, if the world's sole superpower won't then what more excuse does one need.

Israel should be compelled to sign the muclear non-proliferation treaty as well. The imbalance in the Middle-East would still exist, but at least Israel would admit some responsibility and would constitute less of a security threat to nearby states.

I really must obtain this report, it would be interesting to see all 60 recommendations.
__________________
"The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. " — John Stuart Mill
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2006, 05:17 PM
SenaxFlatulus's Avatar
SenaxFlatulus SenaxFlatulus is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,716
usa us indiana
SenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud of
Credits: 47,423
Default Oh really?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
Israel should be compelled to sign the muclear non-proliferation treaty as well. The imbalance in the Middle-East would still exist, but at least Israel would admit some responsibility and would constitute less of a security threat to nearby states.
How many statements has Israel made about wiping out one of its neighbors with a nuclear weapon? Could you please provide a quote?

How many times has Israel used a nuclear weapon in a war or isolated attack?

Why is it that the U.N. is composed of many diplomats who are from countries that not only refuse their right to exist, but call for their anhilation?

Why must Israel be compelled to enter into a treaty that hasn't stopped some present signatories from breaking said treaty?
__________________
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2006, 07:52 PM
apotropoxy apotropoxy is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,483
apotropoxy is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,059
Default Got Nukes?

Quote:
[color=blue]How many statements has Israel made about wiping out one of its neighbors with a nuclear weapon? Could you please provide a quote?
Israel's official line on possession of nuclear weapons is one of deliberate ambiguity. They neither confirm nor deny that they have these weapons. So they are unlikely to have make such a threat.
Quote:
How many times has Israel used a nuclear weapon in a war or isolated attack?
Nuclear weapons have been used in hostile action only twice. It was Israel's best and most important friend who pulled the trigger.
Quote:
Why is it that the U.N. is composed of many diplomats who are from countries that not only refuse their right to exist, but call for their anhilation?
Because the UN is composed of virtually every nation on the earth. There are only a hand full of nations who have called for the annihilation of Israel.
Quote:
Why must Israel be compelled to enter into a treaty that hasn't stopped some present signatories from breaking said treaty?
It is virtually impossible to force Israel to do anything.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden