Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Community > Off-Topic Chat


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:33 PM
DanM DanM is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 806
DanM is on a distinguished road
Credits: 5,702
Default We can discuss all you want.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara-Listensprechen";p=&quot View Post
We could, we could--if it weren't for the fact that religions have in fact revised history to suit their vestiture in history's outcome.

They did, because they have.

============================

Tell ya what--you're so certain that there's just one set of historical facts that is true, how 'bout you do me this favor: Look at the list on

http://www.politicalforum.com/viewto...=2973&start=10

...and pick me out the ONE that is "true religion"...and then cite your historical authorities on how you arrived at your conclusion.

=========================

My own historical authorities are listed in a partial bibliography HERE.
I do not have to agree with your conclusions to enjoy the exchange and I leave my mind open enough to be swayed by a strong presentation of the facts.

Seriously. Lets have some fun and talk about this in detail. All I ask is that we each leave our fangs at the door and allow the other to hold their views without passing judgement. I promise I will do my best to participate in an honest exchange if you will do the same.

Also, if you are interests, then lets start another thread to talk about this since we are getting into a focused discussion.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2004, 06:48 PM
Clara-Listensprechen's Avatar
Clara-Listensprechen Clara-Listensprechen is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,162
usa us oklahoma
Clara-Listensprechen has disabled reputation
Credits: 6,230
Default -

I'm sorry that you interpreted my identification of a particular argument as being of a certain religion as "bringing in fangs", but I assure you I had no fangs walking into this thread to begin with.

I have already begun a couple of threads in the History section, one of which crosses over the one discussed here--one on the Islamic Empire. I have another one debunking common historical myths, based on original documentation instead of a bibliography (patent microfiche and labels, etc.) so how 'bout let's move upstairs to the History department.

Deal?
__________________
I shall continue to be an impossible person as long as those who are now possible remain possible.
HuffPo's Off The Bus campaign coverage project....Off The Bus Blog
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2004, 07:18 PM
Clara-Listensprechen's Avatar
Clara-Listensprechen Clara-Listensprechen is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,162
usa us oklahoma
Clara-Listensprechen has disabled reputation
Credits: 6,230
Default -

Here's an idea, Dan--there's already a crossover to this topic in progress definitely in the Islamic Empire thread in History because the thing that kicked that one off was a previous discussion of the Alexandria Libarary, how that came to meet its destruction.

The topic crosses over to the Roman Empire at the point Julius Caesar burned some of it then restored what he burnt.

http://www.politicalforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2684
__________________
I shall continue to be an impossible person as long as those who are now possible remain possible.
HuffPo's Off The Bus campaign coverage project....Off The Bus Blog
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2004, 06:24 PM
Clara-Listensprechen's Avatar
Clara-Listensprechen Clara-Listensprechen is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,162
usa us oklahoma
Clara-Listensprechen has disabled reputation
Credits: 6,230
Default -

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanM";p=&quot View Post
Seriously. Lets have some fun and talk about this in detail. All I ask is that we each leave our fangs at the door and allow the other to hold their views without passing judgement. I promise I will do my best to participate in an honest exchange if you will do the same.

Also, if you are interests, then lets start another thread to talk about this since we are getting into a focused discussion.
You've dropped by the History section but you haven't discussed much of this detail you said would be so much fun. You want maybe a separate thread on the Roman Empire? If so, why did you just pass thru without starting one?

Just what exactly are you wanting here and why didn't you start whatever it is that you were wanting here? How 'bout YOU start a thread--I'll take you up on this either way.
__________________
I shall continue to be an impossible person as long as those who are now possible remain possible.
HuffPo's Off The Bus campaign coverage project....Off The Bus Blog
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2004, 07:19 PM
Clara-Listensprechen's Avatar
Clara-Listensprechen Clara-Listensprechen is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,162
usa us oklahoma
Clara-Listensprechen has disabled reputation
Credits: 6,230
Default -

Ok, while I'm waiting for you to do something in the History department, I'll just pick up where we left off here...

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanM";p=&quot View Post
I am not trying to zing you, but the facts are off and I have to point it out.

Constantine was the son of a Ceasar and inheritited his rank from his father through the acclimation of the soliders in his ranks. They were native Gauls and not Praetorians.
I thought I essentially said as much. Constantius Chlorus was Constantine's dad. There was an assertion that the Praetorian Guard wasn't a factor when it was, and a big one. There was an assertion that Diocletian moved the government east, before Constantine did, and that was wrong--there were 4 capitals--2 east, 2 west, with C. Chlorus over the Gaul/Britain quadrant. Constantine himself was scarecely up and running as much of anything at the time, and I do believe that's what I said, too.
Quote:
To say he did not have a significant role and was a private makes no sense. He was singled out for his ability while in the east as a hostage of sorts. He was the obvious heir upon his father's death and he was a proven general after his father's death.
After his father's death is the key here. Ya got a little ahead of the story, ya did. Constantine wasn't appointed to squat until well into the year 306. Just the year prior, Diocletian pressured Maximian to abdicate his Augustus status and C. Chlorus was Maximian's boy. Diocletion promoted both Galarius and C. Chlorus to Augustus-hood, and one Severus rose to C. Chlorus' place as Caesar but without Chlorus's consent, piffing off the Brits bigtime, as they'd become fond of him. They took it upon themselves to proclaim Constantine instead to that post. Not strong enough to resist, Galerius reluctantly OK'ed the move.
Quote:
As for the fact that his father was in the military, you are correct. That is not, however, the same thing as saying he was a praetorian.
It is on Roman record that Diocletian was a Praetorian Prefect before he became emperor. Constantius Chlorus was a general. Clear now?
Quote:
If you point is to say that the miltary ran the show, then we can agree. I do not dispute this point in the slightest. Where we disagree is on your assertion that the Praetorians pulled all the strings. They just didn't. The reach of the military went far beyong the Praetorian guards of Rome and Constantine certainly did not move the capital from Rome on account of these supposed power brokers. He moved for economic reasons.
Your argument on this point splits hairs--the Guard was part and parcel of the army.
Quote:
He moved for politican reasons that were already in play. He moved possibly because of personal preference regarding the greek culture. He just didn't leave because he was afraid of the praetorians.
He was afraid of the army and their Praetorian arm (Diocletian' scheme was to create 4 capitals instead of maintaining one, and none of those were in Rome--and a significant part of his reforms was the reduction in number of the Praetorian Guard, with the aim of eliminating it altogether. This is the part he didn't succeed in completing but Constantine subsequently did)...and he was afraid of the army-controlled Senate, also HQ'ed in Rome. That org became a municipal council because it was given no transfer to any one of the 4 capitals).
=============================
Ummm, I don't understand your request for my bibliography when I've already provided a link to one I've posted elsewhere. Just click on that link and you'll see it. I've tried to google up those two authors you mention and I'm not coming up with anything by both of them. You didn't provide any titles, either. Please do, thanks.
__________________
I shall continue to be an impossible person as long as those who are now possible remain possible.
HuffPo's Off The Bus campaign coverage project....Off The Bus Blog
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2004, 07:44 PM
Clara-Listensprechen's Avatar
Clara-Listensprechen Clara-Listensprechen is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,162
usa us oklahoma
Clara-Listensprechen has disabled reputation
Credits: 6,230
Default -

I was able to google up just John Julius Lord Norwich but precious little else. Indeed, agree to resolve that the Christian soldier part of this discussion be tabled until I can complete my research on his sources.
__________________
I shall continue to be an impossible person as long as those who are now possible remain possible.
HuffPo's Off The Bus campaign coverage project....Off The Bus Blog
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2004, 08:50 PM
Clara-Listensprechen's Avatar
Clara-Listensprechen Clara-Listensprechen is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,162
usa us oklahoma
Clara-Listensprechen has disabled reputation
Credits: 6,230
Default -

Discovered a couple of tidbits worth noting, regarding who might have been Christian in the Empire...I've located a list of the "Ten Great Persecutions" beginning with Nero and ending with....!!!

Diocletian.

But there were other non-Great persecutions since...I show a Valerian Edict, as late as 257, ordering further persecution of Christians. It's hard to imagine that these persecutions, Great and small, were even executable without significant army loyalty.

There's much made of Constantine's Edict of Milan, but that one had a Christian-tolerant predecessor: an edict issued by Galerius, don't have a formal title for that one. Year 311. Milan was 313. I have here that by the time Constantine defeated Licinius at Adrianople, the citizenry was 50% Christian.
__________________
I shall continue to be an impossible person as long as those who are now possible remain possible.
HuffPo's Off The Bus campaign coverage project....Off The Bus Blog
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden