![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which of These Statements Describes Your Stance on the Death Penalty? | |||
| All felons should be executed. |
|
3 | 11.54% |
| All murderers and sexual predators should be executed. |
|
4 | 15.38% |
| All murderers should be executed. |
|
2 | 7.69% |
| Murderers who feel no remorse should be executed- and swiftly. |
|
3 | 11.54% |
| Murderers who feel no remorse should be executed- but with an extensive waiting period. |
|
0 | 0% |
| Only mass murderers, such as serial killers and terrorists, should be executed. |
|
0 | 0% |
| The death penalty is acceptable only in wartime emergencies; it should not be used in peacetime. |
|
1 | 3.85% |
| The death penalty is never acceptable. |
|
9 | 34.62% |
| None of the Above (Please Explain) |
|
4 | 15.38% |
| Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Treason? When was the last time anyone was convicted of that? I don't think we'll be offing too many people under that statute.
My problem with the death penalty is that our justice system is not all that impressive. You can end up killing someone who did nothing. So I would say for first degree murder it's acceptable as long as the evidence is iron clad.
__________________
This space for rent. |
|
||||
|
I'm against the death penalty in all cases except when it is possible for the person, even imprisoned in solitary confinement, to cause further damage. This is generally only possible with dictators and certain high-level terrorists.
I also think anyone who is going to be imprisoned for life without any chance of parole should be allowed to opt for the death penalty.
__________________
"It's never over... BOY!" The Tall Man, Phantasm III what your pet really thinks of you... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I agree that attempted murder should be considered just as evil as murder, since the intent is the same. Therefore, if I believed in executing murderers, I would believe in executing attempted murderers at least in principle. There is a problem, though. Dead is dead, and that someone was murdered is relatively easy to establish. However, attempted murder is harder to prove. If someone goes after another person with a gun, knife, ax or some other obviously lethal weapon, then it is clearly a case of attempted murder. However, the line between felony assault and attempted murder is a blurry one. If one person goes after another with a pipe, is that attempted murder? What about a baseball bat? Does it depend on how physically resilient the would-be victim is? That is why, I believe, murder is distinguished from attempted murder. The potential variables in establishing that murder was the intent when no one died are innumerable.
__________________
"Some people complain about the system. The system is not good, so they can't do anything. It's an excuse. Freedom is in your heart." (Jin Xing) |
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are already many nuances in murder charge. 1st degree, 2nd degree, negligent, etc. The level of intent is always part of the charge, and often part of the jury's decision. Take the case of the teenage girl who was raped, bludgeoned, had her arms cut off below the elbows and was left in a ditch to die. The jury should have been given the option of the death penalty. As it happened, the perp served about 8 years, was paroled, and ultimately killed another woman who wasn't as "lucky" as his first victim. Allowing the death penalty for attempted murder simply gives the option to juries. I just gave one example. If a prosecutor wants to go for the death penalty in a baseball bat case, he would need to prove that the perp knew that death was a likely result - the intelligence or education of the defendent could come into play. The jury can decide.
__________________
Order without liberty and liberty without order are equally destructive. - Theodore Roosevelt |
|
||||
|
In the case you mentioned, the issue is that the criminal was obviously an extreme sadist. Such people (rapists, child molesters, and so forth) have to be locked in supermaximum prisons for life with no chance of parole, since they by nature re-offend. Personally, I support mandatory sentencing for only two kinds of criminals: Murderers and sexual predators. If I believed in the death penalty, I would execute both, but since I don't, I think that life in supermaximum prison with no chance of parole (and castration for the predators) is the appropriate sentence.
As for attempted murder, there are just too many gray areas to allow for mandatory sentencing. Of course, some would wonder how I would make room for the people I would give life in prison. I'd take many laws off the books and release certain other criminals far sooner. That is for another thread, though.
__________________
"Some people complain about the system. The system is not good, so they can't do anything. It's an excuse. Freedom is in your heart." (Jin Xing) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks | ||||||
Digg
|
del.icio.us
|
StumbleUpon
|
Google
|
Yahoo
|
Furl
|
Reddit
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|