Thread: If Obama is re-elected, where do you think the debt will be by the end of 2016?

Originally Posted by Cigar

Pop-Quiz – if you have zero/0.00/nada Income;

What % of Tax Revenue are you expecting?

The Liberal think tank at work^ here, Let's watch this...lol


I guess you haven't heard President Otis talking about ALL OF US pay our fair share? SO, since the 47% pay no taxes now, what will they pay if Otis gets his way? you guessed it....NOTHING.

So Otis ain't slick, he wants to say "Pay our fair share" but he wants the Rich to pay the share that the abject poor will never be able to pay. got it?

Otis can't say "tax everybody the same" because he knows his ass will be gone so he plays on the words "fair share" and points his aim at the Rich to pay the "fair share"

OTIS IS LYING TO YOU AND YOU LOVE IT.

Originally Posted by 4Horsemen

The Liberal think tank at work^ here, Let's watch this...lol


I guess you haven't heard President Otis talking about ALL OF US pay our fair share? SO, since the 47% pay no taxes now, what will they pay if Otis gets his way? you guessed it....NOTHING.

So Otis ain't slick, he wants to say "Pay our fair share" but he wants the Rich to pay the share that the abject poor will never be able to pay. got it?

Otis can't say "tax everybody the same" because he knows his ass will be gone so he plays on the words "fair share" and points his aim at the Rich to pay the "fair share"

OTIS IS LYING TO YOU AND YOU LOVE IT.

I don't know who OTIS is ... but I'll make-up a fictional character also ... let's say ... CRACKER!

If CRACKER is unemployed, meaning ... CRACKER is not receiving any income other than his Unemployment-Check that CRACKER has Taxes taken out of ... how much more should CRACKER Pay?

Now ... if CRACKER is neither receiving Unemployment or any other income ... where exactly is the Government going to get it's money from CRACKER?

This ain't Long-Division ... Sport. There really isn't Blood in a Turnip.

Originally Posted by Cigar

I don't know who OTIS is

Otis is Obama . yOU LOSE. and your ignornace is profound.

If Hussein Soetoro get re-elected, America will probably ceases out to exist because everything has been made by this guy is wrong!

Originally Posted by Brewskier

Once again, history is discarded in the face of overwhelming Obama love.

I'm expressing "Obama love" by making an observation about spending and saying the president is irrelevant to the size of the deficit?

Obama has increased the debt by 5 to 6 trillion in 3 years, the first President ever to have over trillion dollar deficits every year, and you actually say that Obama "means nothing for deficits"? Unbelievable.

Given that the president has no authority whatsoever to run a deficit, I fail to see how Obama's presence matters. It's Congress who has decided to run deficits, through a combination of overly aggressive tax cuts and spending.

And you are dreaming if you actually think the debt is going to go down.

I didn't say the debt would go down, I suggested the deficits would go down. This is very obvious, since there will be no stimulus this year, and likely next as well. It's very likely that we will have <$1 trillion deficits over the next four years; making it unlikely that we would pass $20 trillion by 2016.

Originally Posted by Cigar

I don't know who OTIS is ... but I'll make-up a fictional character also ... let's say ... CRACKER!

If CRACKER is unemployed, meaning ... CRACKER is not receiving any income other than his Unemployment-Check that CRACKER has Taxes taken out of ... how much more should CRACKER Pay?

Now ... if CRACKER is neither receiving Unemployment or any other income ... where exactly is the Government going to get it's money from CRACKER?

This ain't Long-Division ... Sport. There really isn't Blood in a Turnip.

We're not talking about taxing unemployed people. We are talking about the 47% of people who work and end up not owing anything to the federal government putting some skin in the game in the interest of "fair share". Just like Obama said.

Originally Posted by Brewskier

We're not talking about taxing unemployed people. We are talking about the 47% of people who work and end up not owing anything to the federal government putting some skin in the game in the interest of "fair share". Just like Obama said.

He knows what you mean, he's just the typical Liberal-spinner that thinks we are stupid enough to think the 47% will pay anything. but we know better and his tinfoil hat signal is jamming up which is why he hasn't replied yet...lol