View Poll Results: Is poverty a natural part of the economy?

Voters
53. You may not vote on this poll
  • The government and society as a whole have a responsibility to end poverty.

    14 26.42%
  • basic things to reduce poverty, but it is the individual's responsibility.

    19 35.85%
  • There will always be poverty, and the government does not have a responsibility to solve it.

    20 37.74%
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 51

Thread: Is poverty a natural part of society?

  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheChief View Post
    Not so much of a problem in australia. Our poor receive all the basics they would need. Housing, food/water/utilities, education and medical care as they need it.
    Amazing. Aren't you backwards Aussues aware that "all the basics they would need" or that you think they need is grossly inadequate. They get that even in the U.S. They're supposed to get all the benefits and luxuries of working people and anything less is brutal mistreatment. This is especially true for people who arrived two days ago and still, it's hard to believe, don't have a house.

    As long as the "poor" are defined as a certain percentage, of course they'l always exists. Some countries have amazingly rich poor people and the whining doesn't decrease one decibel or one minute.


  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PatrickT View Post
    Amazing. Aren't you backwards Aussues aware that "all the basics they would need" or that you think they need is grossly inadequate. They get that even in the U.S. They're supposed to get all the benefits and luxuries of working people and anything less is brutal mistreatment. This is especially true for people who arrived two days ago and still, it's hard to believe, don't have a house.

    As long as the "poor" are defined as a certain percentage, of course they'l always exists. Some countries have amazingly rich poor people and the whining doesn't decrease one decibel or one minute.
    Archie, is that you?
    Die dulci fruere

  3. Default Poverty

    Reducing the poverty is not a one day process and every one must have the responsibility

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    Archie, is that you?
    No, Ian, it's PatrickT and that's actually my name. What's your real name? Josef?

    Poverty will have to not only exist but grow because the liberals deperately need poor people. Getting them jobs is a terrifying concept.
    Last edited by PatrickT; Mar 20 2012 at 05:51 AM.

  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PatrickT View Post
    No, Ian, it's PatrickT and that's actually my name. What's your real name? Josef?
    You do remind me of Archie Bunker sometimes.

    Poverty will have to not only exist but grow because the liberals deperately need poor people. Getting them jobs is a terrifying concept.
    Actually its the capitalist system which requires a pool of easily disposable casual cheap labour. Which is why most of the more advanced western countries have found social democracies the best political system. The US is way behind in this regard.
    Last edited by ian; Mar 23 2012 at 03:35 AM.
    Die dulci fruere

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anders Hoveland View Post
    As we all know, a significant portion of society in the USA, Canada, and Australia live in poverty. This has always been so, more or less. Now of course, the definition of poverty is somewhat subjective, but what is generally meant by this is people who live in basic low-end apartments and struggle to pay rent and save money. Between 10 to 25 percent of the adults in these countries effectively are considered to be living in relative "poverty".

    Do you think poverty is a natural part of society?
    That there will always be poor people that are less motivated or less capable?
    Do you think these people should be living with such low incomes, or should society or the government be doing something about it?
    The answer also depends on what the word "natural" stands for.
    .
    Ludwik Kowalski, the author of a FREE ON_LINE book,

    “Diary of a Former Communist: Thoughts, Feelings, Reality.” The link is:

    http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/life/intro.html

    This autobiography illustrates my evolution from one extreme to another--from a devoted Stalinist to an active anti-communist. This testimony is based on a diary I kept between 1946 and 2004 (in the USSR, Poland, France and the USA).

  7. #27
    ussr
    Location: In the Land of Russia where the Shadows lie.
    Posts: 1,064

    Default

    Society without poverty is possible,it is socialism.
    CAPITALISM DELENDA EST.

  8. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by General Winter View Post
    Society without poverty is possible,it is socialism.
    Yeah, thats why theres no poverty in Russia.
    Die dulci fruere

  9. #29
    ussr
    Location: In the Land of Russia where the Shadows lie.
    Posts: 1,064

    Default

    I never knew that there are some morons in the world who believe that Russia is still socialist.No comment,medicine is helpless here.
    CAPITALISM DELENDA EST.

  10. Default

    The question "Is poverty a natural part of society" should have simple answers for a poll, not convoluted ones. A simple yes or now would have sufficed, however the author wanted to bend the answer so he could slam people.

    The answer is yes, it has always been a part of society since the first cavemen had one guy who didn't have an animal skin to keep warm. It still is that way. Attempting to pigeon-hole people to try and make them feel bad about poverty is abhorrent. It is not our fault. It isn't something we smile in glee about, but we didn't make them poor and there are avenues in which they can begin the climb out. The first one is get an education then get a job.
    "If Republicans wanted to Destroy America, they would Vote Democrat."
    Coolwalker

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks