Thread: Do you approve sex before marriage?

According to the leftist-liberal "moral" sex before marriage is fine,liberal "teachers" indoctrinate students to have sex ( at best homosexual ) before marriage, the more the better. The liberal mainstream medias promote sex before and outside of wedding non-stop 24/7. But what the Holy Bible says about, is there not a conflict between the liberal "moral" and Commandments of God.Also, do you agree with the Holy Bible or share the liberal point of view, please vote and explain.

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

1 Corinthians 6:18 KJV

Let marriage be held in honor by all, and the bed undefiled: but fornicators and adulterers God will judge.

Hebrews 13:4

10 Reasons Not to Have Sex Outside of Marriage

http://christianity.about.com/od/wha...ndthebible.htm

Question: "What does the Bible say about sex before marriage?"

http://www.gotquestions.org/sex-before-marriage.html

No.

Not only did it wrong in the Bible standard. It develops a social problem of child out of weblock, single mothers or singles fathers to raise the kids.

.

So... you should only have sex if you're married, but we shouldn't allow gays to marry? Seems like a bit of a catch-22 to me.

.

Originally Posted by lynx

No.

Not only did it wrong in the Bible standard. It develops a social problem of child out of weblock, single mothers or singles fathers to raise the kids.

Only if one is dumb enough to not use birth control!
I absolutely approve of sex before marriage. . .although I do not approve of casual sex.

I think it is ludicrous to expect too people to commit to a lifelong relationship without knowing whether or not they are sexually compatible.

That doesn't mean that one should jump into bed with a "first date," but when a couple has decided that they really do care for each other enough to consider committing to spending their life together and having children. . . OBVIOUSLY it is stupid to leave sexual compatibility out of the equation!

And, if one is not smart and responsible enough to use birth control. . .one is probably not smart or responsible enough to marry anyway!

Casual sex? No. Just no.

Committed relationship? Absolutely.

But if the thing is true, that evidence of virginity was not found in the young woman, then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has done an outrageous thing in Israel by whoring in her father’s house. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.

Originally Posted by Sadanie

... it is stupid to leave sexual compatibility out of the equation!

I agree.

Originally Posted by Ostap Bender

According to the leftist-liberal "moral" sex before marriage is fine,liberal "teachers" indoctrinate students to have sex ( at best homosexual ) before marriage, the more the better. The liberal mainstream medias promote sex before and outside of wedding non-stop 24/7. But what the Holy Bible says about, is there not a conflict between the liberal "moral" and Commandments of God.Also, do you agree with the Holy Bible or share the liberal point of view, please vote and explain.

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

1 Corinthians 6:18 KJV

Let marriage be held in honor by all, and the bed undefiled: but fornicators and adulterers God will judge.

Hebrews 13:4

10 Reasons Not to Have Sex Outside of Marriage

http://christianity.about.com/od/wha...ndthebible.htm

Question: "What does the Bible say about sex before marriage?"

http://www.gotquestions.org/sex-before-marriage.html

Troll post.

Originally Posted by Wolverine

Casual sex? No. Just no.

Committed relationship? Absolutely.

Difference? None.

Originally Posted by Durandal

Difference? None.

Um..... I suppose when I think of causal sex I am thinking of a friends with benefits type of situation versus a committed relationship.

There is a difference.