Political Forum  

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Opinion POLLS

View Poll Results: Was the War in Iraq part of the war on terrorism?
Yes, it has reduced the risk of terrorism 75 32.75%
No, it has actually created a new source for terrorism in the world 154 67.25%
Voters: 229. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2004, 05:19 PM
Cristian Cristian is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 345
Cristian is on a distinguished road
Credits: 4,120
Default C'mon the CIA has created many Coups!

Many especially in Guatemala and Panama and other nations in the world.

Yes, they even created Saddam Hussein to fight Iran !!!!

So, we have terrorists fighting the terrorists they created !!!
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2004, 07:39 PM
SenaxFlatulus's Avatar
SenaxFlatulus SenaxFlatulus is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 7,616
usa us indiana
SenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to all
Credits: 41,392
Default a bit of clarification...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristian";p=&quot View Post
Yes, they even created Saddam Hussein to fight Iran !!!!
Saddam and the Baathist party staged their own coup. The U.S. didn't back Saddam until the Carter administration, which was quite a while after Saddam killed his way into power.
__________________
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2004, 08:13 PM
maze51 maze51 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 419
maze51 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,978
Default No Link?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hard-Driver";p=&quot View Post
Look, I
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTruth";p=&quot View Post
This had NOTHING to do with 9/11, but that's all the GOP keeps yapping about when discussing Iraq.
Ding Ding Ding We have a winner.

You can say all you want about how Saddam was a bad man. He was. There are many around. One in North Korea that actually HAS a WOMD is certainly more of a threat. And these mysterious un-named links to Al-Qeada are weak at best. I'm sure many countries, including the USA, could have those kind of weak links if you tried to spin it right. But in reality, that is pretty much what it is, spin. No link to 9/11 at all.
Let's see:

HAMAS; blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Al Qaeda; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Hizballah; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Abu Nidal Organization; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Naw, there's no connection here, ya think?

Having read many posts with such a myopic scope of the world terrorist organizations just boggles my mind. This is definitely a global issue and if you think for one second that it is not, then you better be really up on camping, hunting and fishing because life as you know will cease to exist. The main objective of these organizations is not to physically destroy our country (USA) because they counld'nt, but if they could managed to destroy 90% of our economy, you can only imagine the consequences.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2004, 12:00 AM
SporkLord SporkLord is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,517
SporkLord is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,448
Default They aren't the same

Quote:
Originally Posted by maze51";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hard-Driver";p=&quot View Post
Look, I
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTruth";p=&quot View Post
This had NOTHING to do with 9/11, but that's all the GOP keeps yapping about when discussing Iraq.
Ding Ding Ding We have a winner.

You can say all you want about how Saddam was a bad man. He was. There are many around. One in North Korea that actually HAS a WOMD is certainly more of a threat. And these mysterious un-named links to Al-Qeada are weak at best. I'm sure many countries, including the USA, could have those kind of weak links if you tried to spin it right. But in reality, that is pretty much what it is, spin. No link to 9/11 at all.
Let's see:

HAMAS; blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Al Qaeda; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Hizballah; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Abu Nidal Organization; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Naw, there's no connection here, ya think?

Having read many posts with such a myopic scope of the world terrorist organizations just boggles my mind. This is definitely a global issue and if you think for one second that it is not, then you better be really up on camping, hunting and fishing because life as you know will cease to exist. The main objective of these organizations is not to physically destroy our country (USA) because they counld'nt, but if they could managed to destroy 90% of our economy, you can only imagine the consequences.
Those groups listed actually have quite different scopes, agendas, and capabilities. You can't just classify all groups who conduct attacks on civilians (terrorist attacks) as the same, otherwise where is the IRA, ETA, Abu Sayaf, FARC... on that list? Why aren't we hunting them with such fervor?
By this logic, we should invade northern Ireland and get them!
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2004, 01:35 AM
maze51 maze51 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 419
maze51 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,978
Default If the threat is there, we're goin' in...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SporkLord";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by maze51";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hard-Driver";p=&quot View Post
Look, I
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTruth";p=&quot View Post
This had NOTHING to do with 9/11, but that's all the GOP keeps yapping about when discussing Iraq.
Ding Ding Ding We have a winner.

You can say all you want about how Saddam was a bad man. He was. There are many around. One in North Korea that actually HAS a WOMD is certainly more of a threat. And these mysterious un-named links to Al-Qeada are weak at best. I'm sure many countries, including the USA, could have those kind of weak links if you tried to spin it right. But in reality, that is pretty much what it is, spin. No link to 9/11 at all.
Let's see:

HAMAS; blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Al Qaeda; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Hizballah; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Abu Nidal Organization; mission is to blow up innocent children and destroy all life of the ones they hate for their "justified" cause and no negotiation has ever worked.

Naw, there's no connection here, ya think?

Having read many posts with such a myopic scope of the world terrorist organizations just boggles my mind. This is definitely a global issue and if you think for one second that it is not, then you better be really up on camping, hunting and fishing because life as you know will cease to exist. The main objective of these organizations is not to physically destroy our country (USA) because they counld'nt, but if they could managed to destroy 90% of our economy, you can only imagine the consequences.
Those groups listed actually have quite different scopes, agendas, and capabilities. You can't just classify all groups who conduct attacks on civilians (terrorist attacks) as the same, otherwise where is the IRA, ETA, Abu Sayaf, FARC... on that list? Why aren't we hunting them with such fervor?
By this logic, we should invade northern Ireland and get them!
You are kidding aren't you? I can't remember the last time the IRA threaten and aided like terrorist groups to destroy our country.

THIS IS A WAR ON TERROR, OUR TERROR, AND YOU BETTER BE READY TO DEFEND THAT!
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2004, 03:45 AM
SporkLord SporkLord is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,517
SporkLord is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,448
Default You didn't answer my question

You can't remember when IRA made threats? Open up a history book, you should find quite some examples. The IRA is specifically dedicated to the northen Ireland conflict, but has conducted terrorist attacks in mainland UK.
By going after terrorism not just radical islamist terrorism, we should be going after terrorism in all of its variants. Or are we just dedicated to hunting islamic terrorists? Or perhaps just terrorists with interests in harming the USA?

For then its not a "global war" on terror (...ism), its a US "war" on radical islamic terror (...ism).

Or just the oil...
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2004, 04:27 AM
EiregoSod's Avatar
EiregoSod EiregoSod is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: on your shoulder
Posts: 2,019
EiregoSod is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,512
Send a message via AIM to EiregoSod Send a message via MSN to EiregoSod Send a message via Yahoo to EiregoSod
Default .

Actually the IRA has been on ceasefire for most of the past 10 years, as have Loyalist terrorists too.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2004, 04:45 AM
SenaxFlatulus's Avatar
SenaxFlatulus SenaxFlatulus is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 7,616
usa us indiana
SenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to allSenaxFlatulus is a name known to all
Credits: 41,392
Default The IRA...

The IRA hasn't sworn itself to defeat or exterminate America nor has it taken any action against Americans that I know of. While this doesn't make what they did any less reprehensible, there is a huge difference between the IRA and al Qaeda.

If any evidence of a plot to blow up something by the IRA was uncovered, or any intelligence is discovered by us, I'd be willing to bet that the CIA/FBI would pass it along to the proper authorities in the proper country. Most agencies make an effort to cooperate with each other when lives are at stake. They use things such as Interpol, and they share liason personnell with each other. It's sort of like a "cross pollination" process.
__________________
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2004, 05:38 AM
maze51 maze51 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 419
maze51 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,978
Default Like all other countries...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SporkLord";p=&quot View Post
You can't remember when IRA made threats? Open up a history book, you should find quite some examples. The IRA is specifically dedicated to the northen Ireland conflict, but has conducted terrorist attacks in mainland UK.
By going after terrorism not just radical islamist terrorism, we should be going after terrorism in all of its variants. Or are we just dedicated to hunting islamic terrorists? Or perhaps just terrorists with interests in harming the USA?

For then its not a "global war" on terror (...ism), its a US "war" on radical islamic terror (...ism).

Or just the oil...
...if it is not in my interest or benefit stay out of it. The IRA has never attacked the USA, and other than humanitarian, we have no interest in Ireland. Yes, it is the oil that is in our and the worlds vital interests. As I said, all countries do things for other countries that are only in their best interest. Try and name a single one that doesn't. The United States isn't the world police even though you think we are.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2004, 06:02 AM
Hard-Driver's Avatar
Hard-Driver Hard-Driver is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 3,257
Hard-Driver has a spectacular aura aboutHard-Driver has a spectacular aura aboutHard-Driver has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 23,865
Default Hypocrite

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenaxFlatulus";p=&quot View Post
The IRA hasn't sworn itself to defeat or exterminate America nor has it taken any action against Americans that I know of. While this doesn't make what they did any less reprehensible, there is a huge difference between the IRA and al Qaeda.

If any evidence of a plot to blow up something by the IRA was uncovered, or any intelligence is discovered by us, I'd be willing to bet that the CIA/FBI would pass it along to the proper authorities in the proper country. Most agencies make an effort to cooperate with each other when lives are at stake. They use things such as Interpol, and they share liason personnell with each other. It's sort of like a "cross pollination" process.
So let me get this strait. We should invade Iraq because of terror links to the PLO and the Palistinean cause. Because these are the ONLY terror links that Iraq ahs been shown to have. Yet at the same time you claim that the IRA is different because "The IRA hasn't sworn itself to defeat or exterminate America nor has it taken any action against Americans" Both the IRA and PLO are local terrorist organizations with specific causes.

That is called talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google Yahoo Furl Reddit

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4