What is the difference between terrorism and resistance??? Is resistance is terrorism?? Surprised by the West, which describes resistance as terrorism? How to move people from the occupation without resistance ?????????????
Liberating the land are all available means. Even self-sacrifice. Latin describing the resistance in Iraq, terrorism !!!!!!!!!!!
Hahahahah is a strange and wondrous. I like to know the views on this subject. Please be frank and honest views of

Or resist terrorism: Is the killing of American soldiers in Iraq or terrorism valiant resistance

__________________
My last words:
I am going to Iraq soon , goodbye to all my friends in the politicalforum -death for freedom means (martyr) .and death for the occupation of the land means you're a terrorist.
_
watch new_______________________________________________ ____
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lO7ZYW_QR2o
__________________________________________________ __

http://www.albasrah.net/images/war_crimes/index.htm

The poll like all others is difficult to understand.

__________________

Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies, but not terrorists.

democrats believe it is okay to taser a 10 year old if this stance will get their guy elected.

Not too certain what you mean?

__________________
Acceptance is the answer

"Im a Tarte, what! you want some of this?"

I gave you negetive feedback because your poll isn't well thought out. The choices don't even offer dissagreement with where it is obvious your poll is going. If you think people celebrating in the streets because a ruthless dictator is gone, warrants the killing of the very hand that fed you, then you are a terrorist yourself.

Here is a salute to the SF seek and destroy troop that will one day hunt the terrorists who did this cowardly act, and destroy them.

__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address

Killing soldiers would be considered guerilla warfare.

When the targets are civilians, the same act would be considered terrorism.

__________________
I've had a perfectly wonderful evening......... but this wasn't it. -- Marx

Defending your country from a foreign occupier is always resistance.

But there's also legitimate resistance, and resistance that is also terrorism. A clear cut example is this; Hezbollah is a legitiamte resistance. Hamas in a sense, at least in my view, is not a legitimate resistance because it has targetted civilians in the past and to some extent still does.

Hezbollah doesn't target civilians?

al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade doesn't target civilians?

Fatah al-Islam?

حزب الله

Al-Muqawama al-Islamiyya has not targeted one civilian since 1985? Is that what you are saying? What do you know about the 1994 AMIA bombing?

__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address

Hezbollah carried out 4,000 rocket attacks against the Israeli town of Kiryat Shmonah from 1985 to 2003, to wit, they have killed civilians in cowardly acts of terror. Thus, 7 countries, including our own, still deem Hezbollah a terrorist organization, and rightly so.

And who else is firing rockets into civilian populations from Souther Lebenon if it isn't Hezbolla? We know Iran is turning a blind eye. We know that Seria is quietly applauding. So what facts do you have that tell us you are correct?

__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address

Hezbollah used Iranian UAV's to inspect Israeli military sites, and the rocket attacks were aimed at these military sites. Some civilians died of course, but tough sht, that's collateral damage. It happens in a war.

The object of your condemnation should be Israel for placing its military sites so close to civilian areas and neighborhoods, and thus putting its own citizens at risk of collateral damage. That's cowardly, and must be condemned.

And sure a few countries consider Hezbollah a terrorist organization (the usual suspects), but the other 190+ countries, including the EU, don't. In fact Hezbollah was taken off the terrorist list even in the US until an AIPAC drafted resolution forced the group back on the list.

Hezbollah didn't have UAV technology untill just recently. The Katush rocket is an unguided munition, an area bombardment weapon designed to attack a large area. It is not a percision guided munition, and a profressional soldier would grieve in his soul, at the loss of civilian life. He or would she NEVER say "tough sh*t" to such a thing.

As for military in civilian neighborhoods. It is the burden of the officer in command to weigh the cost of civilian life over and above the cost of opational integrity of a declaired war, in which the armed combatants wear uniforms and fight with honor.

Hezbolla, and others like them are cowards and they fight like jackals. Here is the face of the brave fighters in the struggle against Zionism.

YouTube - Terrorist dead by mortar round

__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address