Thread: 1990 Vanity Fair Biography On Obama Discovered Stating He Was Raised In Singapore

Originally Posted by keymanjim

The boy doesn't know anything about his own past.
Even his book was written for him.

And all the retards can say is "lol birthers". It must kill then that we were right all along.

much like his economic policy, he makes it up as he goes along.

Originally Posted by FreshAir

cause of the economy Bush passed on to him, had he got the economy Clinton passed on to Bush, wouldn't it be great... Bush was the worst President ever, two ten year wars and gives the rich a super-sized tax cut, what was the man thinking?

every presidents goal should be to pass the country off in as good or better condition then they received it... Bush FAILED


.

the economy was (*)(*)(*)(*)ing awesome until Dummycrats took control of congress in the 2006 elections...then everything started circling the toilet.

Originally Posted by BullsLawDan

If a person makes a mistake, that means, by definition of "mistake," the SOURCE OF THE WRONG INFORMATION WAS THEM.

How much more clear can this be? My (*)(*)(*)(*)ing seven-year-old understands what it means to make a mistake.

If I am writing a story about you and I interview your mother and she tells my you scored the winning touchdown in your high school championship game and I print that story and it is false, you sat on the bench the whole game, the source of the mistake was your mother not me. If someone ask later how did that misinformation get printed what was the source for it, it was your mother.

So who told the writers of the two stories the misinformation, where did it come from in the first place. Did they just make it up because they were too lazy to find out accurate information?

Originally Posted by SFJEFF

Common? So far you have come up with about 5 bits, scattered in sources dating over 21 years. The common occurrence is that that the information about Obama is accurate.

Not including the misinformation he himself published about himself.

Lets take the 'birth in Kenya' thing- consistantly the media reports that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. After 5 years his opponents found a pamphlet that said he was born in Kenya- this is the 'outliar'.

A pamphlet promoting him by the literary agent he had hired, where did the misinformation come from back then? Where was the sign off by Obama before it was published which is common practice. Did the writer just make it up? Was it a guess?

The 'grew up in Singapore' bit

Yes in a very prominent national magazine, where did they get the information he grew up in Singapore? Who told them? They guessed?

Originally Posted by rahl

these were not important pieces.

Well yes they were, one a very important piece about him that was to be used to promote his up and coming book, the second a piece in a prominent national magazine.

Then of course the misrepresentations in his own book.

Originally Posted by Jango

How do people explain these things away?

They don't and the Obamatards don't want them to be explained.

Originally Posted by Bluesguy

Well yes they were, one a very important piece about him that was to be used to promote his up and coming book, the second a piece in a prominent national magazine.

Then of course the misrepresentations in his own book.

No, they weren't. One was an insignificant bio publication, the other was vanity fair. 2 errors among thousands of publications.

This remains a non issue

Originally Posted by Bluesguy

They don't and the Obamatards don't want them to be explained.

They of course have been explained. But birther retards don't like the answers.

Originally Posted by rahl

No, they weren't. One was an insignificant bio publication, the other was vanity fair. 2 errors among thousands of publications.

those 2 errors are 100% of what was written about him before he entered the national spot light. knowing where they got their facts is important. was it a misprint and a writer bad at geography or was their source a pathological resume padder?

This remains a non issue

it's a non-issue to those that think the private sector is doing fine.

Originally Posted by rahl

No, they weren't. One was an insignificant bio publication

It was not insignificant, it was an important piece about him, for him and his career.

, the other was vanity fair. 2 errors among thousands of publications.

There certainly weren't thousands of publications about him back then.

This remains a non issue

You desperately would hope so but the fact remains his life has been routinely misrepresented even in his own book and no one has yet to explain why there is so much misinformation surrounding him and why he let's it remain uncorrected.