Thread: Obama's Social Security Number challenged.... again

There comes a point one has to wonder if we're dealing with a teflon-president in Barack Obama. No matter how many questions are raised about his eligibility... and never answered... we're just supposed to sweep all these accusations under the rug and go on like nothing's ever been questioned.

This lady isn't giving up. Good for her. There's obviously something wrong with Barack's SS# and while it may be nothing more than an administrative foul-up... America deserves to know the truth.

Having said that... we've been lied to so much by this preident, I'm not even sure we'd recognize the truth.

You go, Ms. Daniels. Glad not everybody is content to drink the kool-aid.

FORGERY-GATE
Obama's Social Security Number challenged

If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 25 years than from his birth certificate.

Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.

Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.”

To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.

Daniels started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social Security Number with the prefix “042″ since 1986.

As she discovered, the “042″ number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama’s, all returned with the documentation “issued 1977-1979 in CT.”

When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama’s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama’s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.

By all accounts, as Daniels thoroughly documents, Obama was then a 15-year-old living in Hawaii. There is no record of him even visiting Connecticut in or near this time frame.

To have gotten a Social Security card at this time Obama would have had to show up for a “mandatory in-person interview.” This could not have taken place in Connecticut. Obama’s sister, Maya, by contrast, uses a number appropriate for a Hawaiian resident.

Daniels checked other databases as well to validate her findings, including the Massachusetts Department of Motor Vehicles and the IRS. Yes, Obama used the 042 number to get a driver’s license when at Harvard and as recently as on his 2009 income tax return.

In her research, Daniels kept coming across what she calls a “marked anomaly,” one she had never seen before – multiple birthdates listed for the same person. The 08/04/1961 and 04/08/1961 variation made sense, but the frequent appearance of the year “1890″ did not.

The ample evidence Daniels gathered led her to believe that the 042 number Obama has been using “had previously been issued to another person,” one who lived in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979 and who was born in 1890.

This assertion can be verified. By law, the Social Security Administration will have kept on microfilm a copy of the original SS-5 application attached to a particular Social Security Number. Daniels, however, does not have access to that microfilm.

For this reason, Daniels has filed suit. “Defendant Husted, through this filing,” she argues, “has been made aware that the Democratic Candidate has been using a fraudulent Social Security Number, which would render Barack Obama ineligible under both the Ohio and U.S. Constitutions.”

Daniels asks the court, among other things, to issue an injunction against Obama’s name appearing on ballot until it is determined that he is using a proper Social Security Number.

Given the response of courts elsewhere, it is unlikely that Daniels will find satisfaction in Geauga County or from the Republican secretary of state.

What Daniels has done, however, is establish a paper trail so indisputably legitimate that even the most squeamish of conservative media will have a hard time finding fault.

The major media, of course, will not bother to look. It is up to our Beltway brethren to step up and ask some very basic questions of the president that they, through their timidity in 2008, helped elect. The Romney campaign cannot talk about this issue without their support.

What if we don't care?

Originally Posted by The Real American Thinker

What if we don't care?

Obviously how he got elected in the first place. Come November, we'll just have to fix that.

and what if you don't?

Originally Posted by The Real American Thinker

What if we don't care?

Dont worry, I know a couple of posters that come running to his aid every time here,,,THEY CARE!! Personally I think it's their job...LOL They rarely post anything else but his defense.....Just wait a bit....

It's true though, even what seems to be so simple to take care of they ignore. I guess everybody knows no matter what nothing would change, both political sides ignore it and no Judge wants anything to do with it....IT'S TOXIC!

Interesting stuff, but none of us knows for sure when or where Obama got his SS#. I expect numbers are also reused, no? The person born in 1890 would likely have been dead by 1977.

Here's some info about prefixes, by the way: http://www.mrfa.org/ssn.htm

I can confirm that my own SS# is what I'd expect, given the info there. It does appear that Obama would have to have been in Connecticut to get the number that he did.

Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman

Obviously how he got elected in the first place. Come November, we'll just have to fix that.

I supported McCain, so my lack of concern had nothing to do with it.

I just don't see the point. Attack him purely on policy and if you're right, you'll win cone November. If not, oh well.

Originally Posted by The Real American Thinker

I supported McCain, so my lack of concern had nothing to do with it.

I just don't see the point. Attack him purely on policy and if you're right, you'll win cone November. If not, oh well.

Unless you got the special Dem-pass that's often awarded to dead people, you weren't old enough to vote in 2008. Will you be voting in the upcoming election or sitting out your first presidential election?

Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman

There comes a point one has to wonder if we're dealing with a teflon-president in Barack Obama. No matter how many questions are raised about his eligibility... and never answered... we're just supposed to sweep all these accusations under the rug and go on like nothing's ever been questioned.
]

Oh that law suit is going to go about as well as all of the other whacky Birther lawsuits.....the judge will dismiss PDQ since the social security number is completely irrelevant to eligiblity or being on a ballot.

Oh well 130 lost court cases.....moving towards 150 court cases lost by whackjob Birthers.

Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman

Unless you got the special Dem-pass that's often awarded to dead people, you weren't old enough to vote in 2008. Will you be voting in the upcoming election or sitting out your first presidential election?

I think I've decided to vote.