Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Other Political Discussion > Political Blogs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2008, 09:30 AM
SweetnessBlog SweetnessBlog is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,189
SweetnessBlog is on a distinguished road
Default Gates Says NATO Must Do More In Afghanistan

From an unconcerned Associated Press:


U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates gives a speech at the 44th Conference on Security Policy in Munich February 10, 2008.

Gates: Western alliance at risk


By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer Sun Feb 10
MUNICH, Germany - NATO’s survival is at stake in the debate over how the United States and Europe should share the burden of fighting Islamic extremism in Afghanistan, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Sunday.
“We must not — we cannot — become a two-tiered alliance of those willing to fight and those who are not,” Gates told the Munich Conference on Security Policy, where Afghanistan was a central topic.
“Such a development, with all its implications for collective security, would effectively destroy the alliance,” he added…
A member of the Russian parliament, leading off the questioning, accused the U.S. of having created today’s al-Qaida threat through American support in the 1980s for the mujahedeen resistance to Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.
Gates disputed that assertion, but said he did regret that the U.S. abandoned Afghanistan after the Soviets withdrew in 1989…
Also addressing the conference was Sergei Ivanov, the former Russian defense minister who is now a deputy prime minister. He advocated joining forces to fight international terrorism, but suggested the U.S. has motives that are out of step with those of Russia and other countries.
“Some states strive to exploit anti-terrorist activities as a pretext to achieving their own geopolitical and economic goals,” Ivanov said, apparently referring to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.
In his speech, Gates praised NATO allies for their contributions in Afghanistan, where the Taliban movement ruled in Kabul and provided a haven for Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida network until U.S. forces invaded after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. But he said pointedly that more effort is needed and the alliance must find a way to win the fight against a resurgent Taliban.
“In NATO, some allies ought not have the luxury of opting only for stability and civilian operations, forcing other allies to bear a disproportionate share of the fighting and the dying,” Gates said.
He named no individual countries; U.S. officials have been pressing Germany to do more…
U.S. Army Gen. John Craddock, the NATO supreme commander, said in an interview shortly before Gates’ appearance that the troops in Afghanistan would be making more progress if they had the resources they were promised more than a year ago. He said they are short at least three maneuver battalions, as well as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance tools to track movements on the ground.
Referring to a “paucity of troops,” Craddock said the commanders in Afghanistan are like the coach of an 11-player soccer team that is competing with two players short. He said the effect is that the commanders are unable to attack and defend as aggressively as they would like.
“Give us the resources,” Craddock said in the interview with U.S. reporters traveling with Gates…
Gates is hoping to persuade Europeans that they have a big stake in the outcome in Afghanistan.
“I am concerned that many people on this continent may not comprehend the magnitude of the direct threat to European security,” posed by radical elements in Afghanistan, he said…
“It raises the question: What would happen if the false success they proclaim became real success? If they triumphed in Iraq or Afghanistan, or managed to topple the government of Pakistan? Or a major Middle Eastern government?“Aside from the chaos that would instantly be sown in the region, success there would beget success on many other fronts as the cancer metastasized further and more rapidly than it already has,” Gate said.
He’s right of course. But it is probably falling on deaf ears. Or worse.
“Some states strive to exploit anti-terrorist activities as a pretext to achieving their own geopolitical and economic goals,” Ivanov said, apparently referring to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.
How can you not hate the Russians? They are simply wreckers.
Lest we forget, this is the same conference where Mr. Putin last year stunned the audience by launching into his paranoid hate-filled rant against the US.
And after all the billions of dollars we gave Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union. Not to mention the aid we gave them to fight their erstwhile allies in WWII.Never again.
</img>
</img> </img> </img> </img> </img>


(Source Link)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nato 'at risk over Afghanistan' DuH2 Warfare / Military 9 02-07-2008 04:24 PM
can NATO rescue Afghanistan? nonsqtr Current Events 23 11-29-2006 12:36 AM
NATO’s failure in Afghanistan ben-franklin Latest World News 1 11-24-2006 07:09 PM
NATO sees no reinforcements for Afghanistan Wildbore Latest World News 16 09-16-2006 08:46 AM
NATO to the rescue in Afghanistan ben-franklin Current Events 8 10-11-2005 01:10 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden