Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Other Political Discussion > Political Blogs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2008, 05:11 AM
OpineBlog OpineBlog is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 570
OpineBlog is infamous around these parts
Default Genetic Sexual Attraction: Urban legend or ticking time bomb?

Genetic Sexual Attraction: Urban legend or ticking time bomb? from Confessions of a Cryo-kid.
Why taking biology out of family isn't a good idea for the long term.
"Often, the attraction isn't sexual, but it's still frightening and alien, and therefore perceived as abnormal and sinful. One woman told me that she and her birth mother, soon after they met, slept together in the nude: there was no sex, only a strong need to be close as parent and child. Grown men tell me they've sat in their mother's lap, just being rocked and held. One man talked about his need to be sexual with his newly found brother, but not being homosexual they shared a woman instead" (Genetic Sexual Attraction, The Guardian, May 17, 2003).
I think it’s about time that people begin to realize that this is an actual reality and that the consequences are beyond what we can imagine. We’re not just worried about half-siblings meeting, but what about cousins and other degrees of consanguinity?? And while birth defects due to increased degrees of consanguinity are still low, take a look at the risks on a larger scale
Interesting. Why do we put up with behavior in blood relatives, that we would never tolerate in someone else? I remember visiting the extended in-laws one holiday, all the adults that married into the family shook our heads in disbelief at their behavior, yet if it was 'our' family we would be treating each other in the same dysfunctional way. That's why they are called 'in-laws', they are distinctively acknowledged to be different then blood relatives and should be treated this way.
A person doesn't expect their mother-in-law to treat him/her the same way s/he treats her own children. It isn't family, with the same bonds created through parental lineage or sibling connections. We talk about genetics as being taboo in terms of mating, that our body is to respond negatively to incestuous relationships, but our genes respond to sanguine bonds in positive ways to tolerate behavior we wouldn't with strangers(in-laws).

I listed this under third party-procreation, since 'Cryo-kid' was conceived by donor', but I see the bigger issue with men and women having children with the ripple effect of the break down of marriage. I wrote about here "strangers among us"

(Source Link)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Legend Of Invincible Army Ended in South of Lebanon omaraqa Middle East 17 08-13-2006 07:48 PM
Urban Myth as Propaganda danarhea Current Events 15 12-23-2005 10:00 PM
If homosexuality is not genetic... Printer2 Gay & Lesbian Rights 39 02-03-2005 12:55 PM
The Clock is Ticking mpotter Current Events 0 08-27-2004 01:30 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden